Cargando…

Biomechanical stability of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with four types of internal fixations: finite element analysis

Objective: Using finite element analysis to identify the optimal internal fixation method for oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), providing guidance for clinical practice. Methods: A finite element model of the L4 – L5 segment was created. Five types of internal fixations were simulated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Jiayu, Tang, XianSheng, Jiang, Nizhou, Wang, Hong, Jiang, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1260693
_version_ 1785117894122668032
author Hao, Jiayu
Tang, XianSheng
Jiang, Nizhou
Wang, Hong
Jiang, Jian
author_facet Hao, Jiayu
Tang, XianSheng
Jiang, Nizhou
Wang, Hong
Jiang, Jian
author_sort Hao, Jiayu
collection PubMed
description Objective: Using finite element analysis to identify the optimal internal fixation method for oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), providing guidance for clinical practice. Methods: A finite element model of the L4 – L5 segment was created. Five types of internal fixations were simulated in the generated L4-L5 finite element (FE) model. Then, six loading scenarios, i.e., flexion, extension, left-leaning, right-leaning, rotate left, and rotate right, were simulated in the FE models with different types of fixations. The biomechanical stability of the spinal segment after different fixations was investigated. Results: Regarding the range of motion (ROM) of the fused segment, OLIF + Bilateral Pedicle Screws (BPS) has a maximum ROM of 1.82° during backward bending and the smallest ROM in all directions of motion compared with other models. In terms of the von Mises stress distribution on the cage, the average stress on every motion direction of OLIF + BPS is about 17.08MPa, and of OLIF + Unilateral Vertebral Screw - Pedicle Screw (UVS-PS) is about 19.29 MPa. As for the von Mises stress distribution on the internal fixation, OLIF + BPS has the maximum internal fixator stress in left rotation (31.85 MPa) and OLIF + Unilateral Pedicle Screw (UPS) has the maximum internal fixator stress in posterior extension (76.59 MPa). The data of these two models were smaller than those of other models. Conclusion: OLIF + BPS provides the greatest biomechanical stability, OLIF + UPS has adequate biomechanical stability, OLIF + UVS-PS is inferior to OLIF + UPS synthetically, and OLIF + Double row vertical screw (DRVS) and Individual OLIF (IO) do not present significant obvious advantages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10561304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105613042023-10-10 Biomechanical stability of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with four types of internal fixations: finite element analysis Hao, Jiayu Tang, XianSheng Jiang, Nizhou Wang, Hong Jiang, Jian Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Objective: Using finite element analysis to identify the optimal internal fixation method for oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), providing guidance for clinical practice. Methods: A finite element model of the L4 – L5 segment was created. Five types of internal fixations were simulated in the generated L4-L5 finite element (FE) model. Then, six loading scenarios, i.e., flexion, extension, left-leaning, right-leaning, rotate left, and rotate right, were simulated in the FE models with different types of fixations. The biomechanical stability of the spinal segment after different fixations was investigated. Results: Regarding the range of motion (ROM) of the fused segment, OLIF + Bilateral Pedicle Screws (BPS) has a maximum ROM of 1.82° during backward bending and the smallest ROM in all directions of motion compared with other models. In terms of the von Mises stress distribution on the cage, the average stress on every motion direction of OLIF + BPS is about 17.08MPa, and of OLIF + Unilateral Vertebral Screw - Pedicle Screw (UVS-PS) is about 19.29 MPa. As for the von Mises stress distribution on the internal fixation, OLIF + BPS has the maximum internal fixator stress in left rotation (31.85 MPa) and OLIF + Unilateral Pedicle Screw (UPS) has the maximum internal fixator stress in posterior extension (76.59 MPa). The data of these two models were smaller than those of other models. Conclusion: OLIF + BPS provides the greatest biomechanical stability, OLIF + UPS has adequate biomechanical stability, OLIF + UVS-PS is inferior to OLIF + UPS synthetically, and OLIF + Double row vertical screw (DRVS) and Individual OLIF (IO) do not present significant obvious advantages. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10561304/ /pubmed/37818236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1260693 Text en Copyright © 2023 Hao, Tang, Jiang, Wang and Jiang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Hao, Jiayu
Tang, XianSheng
Jiang, Nizhou
Wang, Hong
Jiang, Jian
Biomechanical stability of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with four types of internal fixations: finite element analysis
title Biomechanical stability of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with four types of internal fixations: finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical stability of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with four types of internal fixations: finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical stability of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with four types of internal fixations: finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical stability of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with four types of internal fixations: finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical stability of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with four types of internal fixations: finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical stability of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with four types of internal fixations: finite element analysis
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1260693
work_keys_str_mv AT haojiayu biomechanicalstabilityofobliquelateralinterbodyfusioncombinedwithfourtypesofinternalfixationsfiniteelementanalysis
AT tangxiansheng biomechanicalstabilityofobliquelateralinterbodyfusioncombinedwithfourtypesofinternalfixationsfiniteelementanalysis
AT jiangnizhou biomechanicalstabilityofobliquelateralinterbodyfusioncombinedwithfourtypesofinternalfixationsfiniteelementanalysis
AT wanghong biomechanicalstabilityofobliquelateralinterbodyfusioncombinedwithfourtypesofinternalfixationsfiniteelementanalysis
AT jiangjian biomechanicalstabilityofobliquelateralinterbodyfusioncombinedwithfourtypesofinternalfixationsfiniteelementanalysis