Cargando…
Proton Beam Therapy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis
INTRODUCTION: Proton beam therapy (PBT) is known to be an effective locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few comparative studies in treatment-naïve cases have been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the survival outcomes of PBT with those of radiofrequency...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37817755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000528537 |
_version_ | 1785117898234134528 |
---|---|
author | Sekino, Yuta Tateishi, Ryosuke Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi Okumura, Toshiyuki Maruo, Kazushi Iizumi, Takashi Numajiri, Haruko Mizumoto, Masashi Minami, Tatsuya Nakagomi, Ryo Sato, Masaya Asaoka, Yoshinari Nakagawa, Hayato Hayata, Yuki Fujiwara, Naoto Shiina, Shuichiro Koike, Kazuhiko Sakurai, Hideyuki |
author_facet | Sekino, Yuta Tateishi, Ryosuke Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi Okumura, Toshiyuki Maruo, Kazushi Iizumi, Takashi Numajiri, Haruko Mizumoto, Masashi Minami, Tatsuya Nakagomi, Ryo Sato, Masaya Asaoka, Yoshinari Nakagawa, Hayato Hayata, Yuki Fujiwara, Naoto Shiina, Shuichiro Koike, Kazuhiko Sakurai, Hideyuki |
author_sort | Sekino, Yuta |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Proton beam therapy (PBT) is known to be an effective locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few comparative studies in treatment-naïve cases have been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the survival outcomes of PBT with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with treatment-naïve solitary HCC. METHODS: Ninety-five consecutive patients with treatment-naïve HCC, a single nodule measuring ≤5 cm in diameter, and a Child-Pugh score of ≤8 who were treated with PBT at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between 2001 and 2013 were enrolled in the study. In addition, 836 patients with treatment-naïve HCC treated by RFA at the University of Tokyo Hospital during the same period were analyzed as controls. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in 83 patient pairs after propensity score matching. RESULTS: The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year RFS rates were 86.6%, 49.5%, and 35.5%, respectively, in the PBT group and 59.5%, 34.0%, and 20.9% in the RFA group (p = 0.058); the respective OS rates were 97.6%, 77.8%, and 57.1% in the PBT group and 95.1%, 81.7%, and 67.7% in the RFA group (p = 0.16). Regarding adverse effects, no grade 3 or higher adverse events were noted in the PBT; however, two grade 3 adverse events occurred within 30 days of RFA in the RFA group: one hemoperitoneum and one hemothorax. DISCUSSION: After propensity score matching, PBT showed no significant difference in RFS and OS compared to RFA. PBT can be an alternative for patients with solitary treatment-naïve HCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10561322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105613222023-10-10 Proton Beam Therapy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis Sekino, Yuta Tateishi, Ryosuke Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi Okumura, Toshiyuki Maruo, Kazushi Iizumi, Takashi Numajiri, Haruko Mizumoto, Masashi Minami, Tatsuya Nakagomi, Ryo Sato, Masaya Asaoka, Yoshinari Nakagawa, Hayato Hayata, Yuki Fujiwara, Naoto Shiina, Shuichiro Koike, Kazuhiko Sakurai, Hideyuki Liver Cancer Research Article INTRODUCTION: Proton beam therapy (PBT) is known to be an effective locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few comparative studies in treatment-naïve cases have been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the survival outcomes of PBT with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with treatment-naïve solitary HCC. METHODS: Ninety-five consecutive patients with treatment-naïve HCC, a single nodule measuring ≤5 cm in diameter, and a Child-Pugh score of ≤8 who were treated with PBT at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between 2001 and 2013 were enrolled in the study. In addition, 836 patients with treatment-naïve HCC treated by RFA at the University of Tokyo Hospital during the same period were analyzed as controls. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in 83 patient pairs after propensity score matching. RESULTS: The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year RFS rates were 86.6%, 49.5%, and 35.5%, respectively, in the PBT group and 59.5%, 34.0%, and 20.9% in the RFA group (p = 0.058); the respective OS rates were 97.6%, 77.8%, and 57.1% in the PBT group and 95.1%, 81.7%, and 67.7% in the RFA group (p = 0.16). Regarding adverse effects, no grade 3 or higher adverse events were noted in the PBT; however, two grade 3 adverse events occurred within 30 days of RFA in the RFA group: one hemoperitoneum and one hemothorax. DISCUSSION: After propensity score matching, PBT showed no significant difference in RFS and OS compared to RFA. PBT can be an alternative for patients with solitary treatment-naïve HCC. S. Karger AG 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10561322/ /pubmed/37817755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000528537 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sekino, Yuta Tateishi, Ryosuke Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi Okumura, Toshiyuki Maruo, Kazushi Iizumi, Takashi Numajiri, Haruko Mizumoto, Masashi Minami, Tatsuya Nakagomi, Ryo Sato, Masaya Asaoka, Yoshinari Nakagawa, Hayato Hayata, Yuki Fujiwara, Naoto Shiina, Shuichiro Koike, Kazuhiko Sakurai, Hideyuki Proton Beam Therapy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title | Proton Beam Therapy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title_full | Proton Beam Therapy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title_fullStr | Proton Beam Therapy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Proton Beam Therapy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title_short | Proton Beam Therapy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title_sort | proton beam therapy versus radiofrequency ablation for patients with treatment-naïve single hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37817755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000528537 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sekinoyuta protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT tateishiryosuke protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT fukumitsunobuyoshi protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT okumuratoshiyuki protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT maruokazushi protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT iizumitakashi protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT numajiriharuko protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT mizumotomasashi protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT minamitatsuya protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT nakagomiryo protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT satomasaya protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT asaokayoshinari protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT nakagawahayato protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT hayatayuki protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT fujiwaranaoto protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT shiinashuichiro protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT koikekazuhiko protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis AT sakuraihideyuki protonbeamtherapyversusradiofrequencyablationforpatientswithtreatmentnaivesinglehepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysis |