Cargando…
“But can chatbots understand sex?” Attitudes towards artificial intelligence chatbots amongst sexual and reproductive health professionals: An exploratory mixed-methods study
BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled chatbots can offer anonymous education about sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Understanding chatbot acceptability and feasibility allows the identification of barriers to the design and implementation. METHODS: In 2020, we conducted an online sur...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37269292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09564624231180777 |
_version_ | 1785117942725214208 |
---|---|
author | Nadarzynski, Tom Lunt, Alexandria Knights, Nicky Bayley, Jake Llewellyn, Carrie |
author_facet | Nadarzynski, Tom Lunt, Alexandria Knights, Nicky Bayley, Jake Llewellyn, Carrie |
author_sort | Nadarzynski, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled chatbots can offer anonymous education about sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Understanding chatbot acceptability and feasibility allows the identification of barriers to the design and implementation. METHODS: In 2020, we conducted an online survey and qualitative interviews with SRH professionals recruited online to explore the views on AI, automation and chatbots. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Amongst 150 respondents (48% specialist doctor/consultant), only 22% perceived chatbots as effective and 24% saw them as ineffective for SRH advice [Mean = 2.91, SD = 0.98, range: 1–5]. Overall, there were mixed attitudes towards SRH chatbots [Mean = 4.03, SD = 0.87, range: 1–7]. Chatbots were most acceptable for appointment booking, general sexual health advice and signposting, but not acceptable for safeguarding, virtual diagnosis, and emotional support. Three themes were identified: “Moving towards a ‘digital’ age’“, “AI improving access and service efficacy”, and “Hesitancy towards AI”. CONCLUSIONS: Half of SRH professionals were hesitant about the use of chatbots in SRH services, attributed to concerns about patient safety, and lack of familiarity with this technology. Future studies should explore the role of AI chatbots as supplementary tools for SRH promotion. Chatbot designers need to address the concerns of health professionals to increase acceptability and engagement with AI-enabled services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10561522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105615222023-10-10 “But can chatbots understand sex?” Attitudes towards artificial intelligence chatbots amongst sexual and reproductive health professionals: An exploratory mixed-methods study Nadarzynski, Tom Lunt, Alexandria Knights, Nicky Bayley, Jake Llewellyn, Carrie Int J STD AIDS Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled chatbots can offer anonymous education about sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Understanding chatbot acceptability and feasibility allows the identification of barriers to the design and implementation. METHODS: In 2020, we conducted an online survey and qualitative interviews with SRH professionals recruited online to explore the views on AI, automation and chatbots. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Amongst 150 respondents (48% specialist doctor/consultant), only 22% perceived chatbots as effective and 24% saw them as ineffective for SRH advice [Mean = 2.91, SD = 0.98, range: 1–5]. Overall, there were mixed attitudes towards SRH chatbots [Mean = 4.03, SD = 0.87, range: 1–7]. Chatbots were most acceptable for appointment booking, general sexual health advice and signposting, but not acceptable for safeguarding, virtual diagnosis, and emotional support. Three themes were identified: “Moving towards a ‘digital’ age’“, “AI improving access and service efficacy”, and “Hesitancy towards AI”. CONCLUSIONS: Half of SRH professionals were hesitant about the use of chatbots in SRH services, attributed to concerns about patient safety, and lack of familiarity with this technology. Future studies should explore the role of AI chatbots as supplementary tools for SRH promotion. Chatbot designers need to address the concerns of health professionals to increase acceptability and engagement with AI-enabled services. SAGE Publications 2023-06-03 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10561522/ /pubmed/37269292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09564624231180777 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Nadarzynski, Tom Lunt, Alexandria Knights, Nicky Bayley, Jake Llewellyn, Carrie “But can chatbots understand sex?” Attitudes towards artificial intelligence chatbots amongst sexual and reproductive health professionals: An exploratory mixed-methods study |
title | “But can chatbots understand sex?” Attitudes towards artificial intelligence chatbots amongst sexual and reproductive health professionals: An exploratory mixed-methods study |
title_full | “But can chatbots understand sex?” Attitudes towards artificial intelligence chatbots amongst sexual and reproductive health professionals: An exploratory mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | “But can chatbots understand sex?” Attitudes towards artificial intelligence chatbots amongst sexual and reproductive health professionals: An exploratory mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | “But can chatbots understand sex?” Attitudes towards artificial intelligence chatbots amongst sexual and reproductive health professionals: An exploratory mixed-methods study |
title_short | “But can chatbots understand sex?” Attitudes towards artificial intelligence chatbots amongst sexual and reproductive health professionals: An exploratory mixed-methods study |
title_sort | “but can chatbots understand sex?” attitudes towards artificial intelligence chatbots amongst sexual and reproductive health professionals: an exploratory mixed-methods study |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37269292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09564624231180777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nadarzynskitom butcanchatbotsunderstandsexattitudestowardsartificialintelligencechatbotsamongstsexualandreproductivehealthprofessionalsanexploratorymixedmethodsstudy AT luntalexandria butcanchatbotsunderstandsexattitudestowardsartificialintelligencechatbotsamongstsexualandreproductivehealthprofessionalsanexploratorymixedmethodsstudy AT knightsnicky butcanchatbotsunderstandsexattitudestowardsartificialintelligencechatbotsamongstsexualandreproductivehealthprofessionalsanexploratorymixedmethodsstudy AT bayleyjake butcanchatbotsunderstandsexattitudestowardsartificialintelligencechatbotsamongstsexualandreproductivehealthprofessionalsanexploratorymixedmethodsstudy AT llewellyncarrie butcanchatbotsunderstandsexattitudestowardsartificialintelligencechatbotsamongstsexualandreproductivehealthprofessionalsanexploratorymixedmethodsstudy |