Cargando…

Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper

In laparoscopic surgery, quality of haptic feedback is reduced compared to conventional surgery, leading to unintentional tissue damage during grasping. From the perspective of haptics, poor mechanical design of laparoscopic instrument joints induces friction and a nonlinear actuation-tip force rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IEEE 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37817822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3291925
_version_ 1785117988472487936
collection PubMed
description In laparoscopic surgery, quality of haptic feedback is reduced compared to conventional surgery, leading to unintentional tissue damage during grasping. From the perspective of haptics, poor mechanical design of laparoscopic instrument joints induces friction and a nonlinear actuation-tip force relation. In this study, a novel laparoscopic grasper using compliant joints and a magnetic balancer is presented, and the reduction in hysteresis and friction is evaluated. The hysteresis loop of the novel compliant grasper and two conventional laparoscopic graspers (high quality leading commercial brand and low quality unbranded grasper) were measured. In order to assess quality of haptic feedback, the lowest grasper tip load perceivable by instrument users was measured with the novel and the conventional laparoscopic graspers. The hysteresis loop measurement yielded a mechanical efficiency of 43% for the novel grasper, compared to- 25% and 23% for the Aesculap and the unbranded grasper, respectively. The forces perceivable by the user through the novel grasper were significantly lower (mean 1.37N, SD 0.44N) than those of conventional graspers (mean 2.15N, SD 0.71N and mean 2.65N, SD 1.20N, respectively). The balanced compliant grasper technology has the ability to improve the quality of haptic feedback compared to conventional laparoscopic graspers. Research is needed to relate these results to soft and delicate tissue grasping in a clinical setting, for which this instrument is intended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10561751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher IEEE
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105617512023-10-10 Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Article In laparoscopic surgery, quality of haptic feedback is reduced compared to conventional surgery, leading to unintentional tissue damage during grasping. From the perspective of haptics, poor mechanical design of laparoscopic instrument joints induces friction and a nonlinear actuation-tip force relation. In this study, a novel laparoscopic grasper using compliant joints and a magnetic balancer is presented, and the reduction in hysteresis and friction is evaluated. The hysteresis loop of the novel compliant grasper and two conventional laparoscopic graspers (high quality leading commercial brand and low quality unbranded grasper) were measured. In order to assess quality of haptic feedback, the lowest grasper tip load perceivable by instrument users was measured with the novel and the conventional laparoscopic graspers. The hysteresis loop measurement yielded a mechanical efficiency of 43% for the novel grasper, compared to- 25% and 23% for the Aesculap and the unbranded grasper, respectively. The forces perceivable by the user through the novel grasper were significantly lower (mean 1.37N, SD 0.44N) than those of conventional graspers (mean 2.15N, SD 0.71N and mean 2.65N, SD 1.20N, respectively). The balanced compliant grasper technology has the ability to improve the quality of haptic feedback compared to conventional laparoscopic graspers. Research is needed to relate these results to soft and delicate tissue grasping in a clinical setting, for which this instrument is intended. IEEE 2023-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10561751/ /pubmed/37817822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3291925 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper
title Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper
title_full Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper
title_fullStr Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper
title_full_unstemmed Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper
title_short Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper
title_sort design and evaluation of a balanced compliant laparoscopic grasper
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37817822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3291925
work_keys_str_mv AT designandevaluationofabalancedcompliantlaparoscopicgrasper
AT designandevaluationofabalancedcompliantlaparoscopicgrasper
AT designandevaluationofabalancedcompliantlaparoscopicgrasper
AT designandevaluationofabalancedcompliantlaparoscopicgrasper
AT designandevaluationofabalancedcompliantlaparoscopicgrasper