Cargando…

Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose‐mimicking optimization

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of a deep learning architecture for automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). METHODS: A 3‐dimensional (3D) U‐Net model has been implemented in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) that uses contoured regi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maes, Dominic, Holmstrom, Mats, Helander, Rasmus, Saini, Jatinder, Fang, Christine, Bowen, Stephen R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14065
_version_ 1785118039346249728
author Maes, Dominic
Holmstrom, Mats
Helander, Rasmus
Saini, Jatinder
Fang, Christine
Bowen, Stephen R.
author_facet Maes, Dominic
Holmstrom, Mats
Helander, Rasmus
Saini, Jatinder
Fang, Christine
Bowen, Stephen R.
author_sort Maes, Dominic
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of a deep learning architecture for automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). METHODS: A 3‐dimensional (3D) U‐Net model has been implemented in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) that uses contoured regions of interest (ROI) binary masks as model inputs with a predicted dose distribution as the model output. Predicted dose distributions were converted to deliverable PBS treatment plans using a voxel‐wise robust dose mimicking optimization algorithm. This model was leveraged to generate machine learning (ML) optimized plans for patients receiving proton PBS irradiation of the chest wall. Model training was carried out on a retrospective set of 48 previously‐treated chest wall patient treatment plans. Model evaluation was carried out by generating ML‐optimized plans on a hold‐out set of 12 contoured chest wall patient CT datasets from previously treated patients. Clinical goal criteria and gamma analysis were used to compare dose distributions of the ML‐optimized plans against the clinically approved plans across the test patients. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of mean clinical goal criteria indicates that compared to the clinical plans, the ML optimization workflow generated robust plans with similar dose to the heart, lungs, and esophagus while achieving superior dosimetric coverage to the PTV chest wall (clinical mean V95 = 97.6% vs. ML mean V95 = 99.1%, p < 0.001) across the 12 test patients. CONCLUSIONS: ML‐based automated treatment plan optimization using the 3D U‐Net model can generate treatment plans of similar clinical quality compared to human‐driven optimization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10562035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105620352023-10-10 Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose‐mimicking optimization Maes, Dominic Holmstrom, Mats Helander, Rasmus Saini, Jatinder Fang, Christine Bowen, Stephen R. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of a deep learning architecture for automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). METHODS: A 3‐dimensional (3D) U‐Net model has been implemented in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) that uses contoured regions of interest (ROI) binary masks as model inputs with a predicted dose distribution as the model output. Predicted dose distributions were converted to deliverable PBS treatment plans using a voxel‐wise robust dose mimicking optimization algorithm. This model was leveraged to generate machine learning (ML) optimized plans for patients receiving proton PBS irradiation of the chest wall. Model training was carried out on a retrospective set of 48 previously‐treated chest wall patient treatment plans. Model evaluation was carried out by generating ML‐optimized plans on a hold‐out set of 12 contoured chest wall patient CT datasets from previously treated patients. Clinical goal criteria and gamma analysis were used to compare dose distributions of the ML‐optimized plans against the clinically approved plans across the test patients. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of mean clinical goal criteria indicates that compared to the clinical plans, the ML optimization workflow generated robust plans with similar dose to the heart, lungs, and esophagus while achieving superior dosimetric coverage to the PTV chest wall (clinical mean V95 = 97.6% vs. ML mean V95 = 99.1%, p < 0.001) across the 12 test patients. CONCLUSIONS: ML‐based automated treatment plan optimization using the 3D U‐Net model can generate treatment plans of similar clinical quality compared to human‐driven optimization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10562035/ /pubmed/37334746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14065 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Maes, Dominic
Holmstrom, Mats
Helander, Rasmus
Saini, Jatinder
Fang, Christine
Bowen, Stephen R.
Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose‐mimicking optimization
title Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose‐mimicking optimization
title_full Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose‐mimicking optimization
title_fullStr Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose‐mimicking optimization
title_full_unstemmed Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose‐mimicking optimization
title_short Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose‐mimicking optimization
title_sort automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose‐mimicking optimization
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14065
work_keys_str_mv AT maesdominic automatedtreatmentplanningforprotonpencilbeamscanningusingdeeplearningdosepredictionanddosemimickingoptimization
AT holmstrommats automatedtreatmentplanningforprotonpencilbeamscanningusingdeeplearningdosepredictionanddosemimickingoptimization
AT helanderrasmus automatedtreatmentplanningforprotonpencilbeamscanningusingdeeplearningdosepredictionanddosemimickingoptimization
AT sainijatinder automatedtreatmentplanningforprotonpencilbeamscanningusingdeeplearningdosepredictionanddosemimickingoptimization
AT fangchristine automatedtreatmentplanningforprotonpencilbeamscanningusingdeeplearningdosepredictionanddosemimickingoptimization
AT bowenstephenr automatedtreatmentplanningforprotonpencilbeamscanningusingdeeplearningdosepredictionanddosemimickingoptimization