Cargando…

Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: Compare the bonding survival rate of two distinct bonding materials: Ortho Solo + Gradia LoFlo Resin and single component GC Ortho Connect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Indirect bonding fixed appliance treatment was required for 26 consecutive patients, 8 males and 18 females, with a mean age o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pellitteri, Federica, Cremonini, Francesca, Bellavia, Marco, Palone, Mario, Lombardo, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37823083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.017
_version_ 1785118064534093824
author Pellitteri, Federica
Cremonini, Francesca
Bellavia, Marco
Palone, Mario
Lombardo, Luca
author_facet Pellitteri, Federica
Cremonini, Francesca
Bellavia, Marco
Palone, Mario
Lombardo, Luca
author_sort Pellitteri, Federica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Compare the bonding survival rate of two distinct bonding materials: Ortho Solo + Gradia LoFlo Resin and single component GC Ortho Connect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Indirect bonding fixed appliance treatment was required for 26 consecutive patients, 8 males and 18 females, with a mean age of 22.1 +/- 4.2 years. All patients were treated with SWM (Straight-Wire Mirabella) technique (Sweden and Martina, Due Carrare, Padova, Italy). Each patient's bonding process followed a contralateral pattern. Firstly, a 37 % orthophosphoric acid etching gel was used for 20 s, subsequently the single or two components light-cured adhesives were applied through a split-mouth cross-arch procedure. The patients underwent a 12-month follow-up period and brackets failures were rebounded, but not further included in the study. Statistical analysis was performed to analyse the survival rate of the bonding materials and the influence of the variables, with a significant level of α = 0,05. RESULTS: The GC Connect group was used on 349 teeth, while the Ortho Solo + Gradia group was used on 351 teeth, and the indirect debonding rate was respectively 17.5% and 12.8%. With respect to the total sample, statistically significant values were found for both sex and dental arch. The bracket’s survival rate for incisors, canines, premolars and molars was not significant. However, a higher debonding rate was clinically appreciable in upper and lower molars. CONCLUSION: In a 12-months observation period, considering all maxillary and mandibular teeth the indirect survival rate for the group GC Ortho Connect and Ortho Solo + Gradia was respectively 82.5% and 87.2%. Although the difference was not significant, a pronounced tendency to debonding for the single component group was appreciable from a clinically point of view.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10562160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105621602023-10-11 Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial Pellitteri, Federica Cremonini, Francesca Bellavia, Marco Palone, Mario Lombardo, Luca Saudi Dent J Original Article OBJECTIVE: Compare the bonding survival rate of two distinct bonding materials: Ortho Solo + Gradia LoFlo Resin and single component GC Ortho Connect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Indirect bonding fixed appliance treatment was required for 26 consecutive patients, 8 males and 18 females, with a mean age of 22.1 +/- 4.2 years. All patients were treated with SWM (Straight-Wire Mirabella) technique (Sweden and Martina, Due Carrare, Padova, Italy). Each patient's bonding process followed a contralateral pattern. Firstly, a 37 % orthophosphoric acid etching gel was used for 20 s, subsequently the single or two components light-cured adhesives were applied through a split-mouth cross-arch procedure. The patients underwent a 12-month follow-up period and brackets failures were rebounded, but not further included in the study. Statistical analysis was performed to analyse the survival rate of the bonding materials and the influence of the variables, with a significant level of α = 0,05. RESULTS: The GC Connect group was used on 349 teeth, while the Ortho Solo + Gradia group was used on 351 teeth, and the indirect debonding rate was respectively 17.5% and 12.8%. With respect to the total sample, statistically significant values were found for both sex and dental arch. The bracket’s survival rate for incisors, canines, premolars and molars was not significant. However, a higher debonding rate was clinically appreciable in upper and lower molars. CONCLUSION: In a 12-months observation period, considering all maxillary and mandibular teeth the indirect survival rate for the group GC Ortho Connect and Ortho Solo + Gradia was respectively 82.5% and 87.2%. Although the difference was not significant, a pronounced tendency to debonding for the single component group was appreciable from a clinically point of view. Elsevier 2023-09 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10562160/ /pubmed/37823083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.017 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Pellitteri, Federica
Cremonini, Francesca
Bellavia, Marco
Palone, Mario
Lombardo, Luca
Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial
title Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial
title_full Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial
title_fullStr Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial
title_short Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial
title_sort survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: a 12-month split-mouth clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37823083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.017
work_keys_str_mv AT pellitterifederica survivalrateofindirectlybondedbracketsusingsinglevstwocomponentorthodonticadhesivea12monthsplitmouthclinicaltrial
AT cremoninifrancesca survivalrateofindirectlybondedbracketsusingsinglevstwocomponentorthodonticadhesivea12monthsplitmouthclinicaltrial
AT bellaviamarco survivalrateofindirectlybondedbracketsusingsinglevstwocomponentorthodonticadhesivea12monthsplitmouthclinicaltrial
AT palonemario survivalrateofindirectlybondedbracketsusingsinglevstwocomponentorthodonticadhesivea12monthsplitmouthclinicaltrial
AT lombardoluca survivalrateofindirectlybondedbracketsusingsinglevstwocomponentorthodonticadhesivea12monthsplitmouthclinicaltrial