Cargando…
How can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease?
PURPOSE: Subglottic stenosis, a rare condition of the upper airway, is frequently misdiagnosed as obstructive lung disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether subglottic stenosis could be identified and distinguished from asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using sp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37540269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08141-3 |
_version_ | 1785118091128078336 |
---|---|
author | Ntouniadakis, Eleftherios Sundh, Josefin Söderqvist, Jeanette von Beckerath, Mathias |
author_facet | Ntouniadakis, Eleftherios Sundh, Josefin Söderqvist, Jeanette von Beckerath, Mathias |
author_sort | Ntouniadakis, Eleftherios |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Subglottic stenosis, a rare condition of the upper airway, is frequently misdiagnosed as obstructive lung disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether subglottic stenosis could be identified and distinguished from asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using spirometry or the dyspnea index (DI). METHODS: The study population included 43 patients with asthma, 31 patients with COPD and 50 patients with subglottic stenosis planned to undergo endoscopic intervention. All patients completed the DI and underwent dynamic spirometry registering both inspiratory and expiratory volumes and flows, including the expiratory disproportion index (EDI), the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to peak expiratory flow. One-way analysis of variance assessed the discrepancy of the variables among the study groups, and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis determined the measurement with the best discriminatory power providing a cutoff value, maximizing both sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The only statistically significant variables differing between all three groups were the EDI and the DI. The EDI showed an excellent area under the ROC curve (0.99, p < 0.001) with a cutoff value of 0.39 (98% sensitivity, 96% specificity), followed by DI (0.87, p < 0.001) with a cutoff score of > 25 (83% sensitivity and 78% specificity). CONCLUSION: In patients with dyspnea of unknown cause, an increase in EDI should arouse a suspicion of extrathoracic airway obstruction, advocating for further evaluation with laryngotracheoscopy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-08141-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10562276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105622762023-10-11 How can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease? Ntouniadakis, Eleftherios Sundh, Josefin Söderqvist, Jeanette von Beckerath, Mathias Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Laryngology PURPOSE: Subglottic stenosis, a rare condition of the upper airway, is frequently misdiagnosed as obstructive lung disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether subglottic stenosis could be identified and distinguished from asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using spirometry or the dyspnea index (DI). METHODS: The study population included 43 patients with asthma, 31 patients with COPD and 50 patients with subglottic stenosis planned to undergo endoscopic intervention. All patients completed the DI and underwent dynamic spirometry registering both inspiratory and expiratory volumes and flows, including the expiratory disproportion index (EDI), the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to peak expiratory flow. One-way analysis of variance assessed the discrepancy of the variables among the study groups, and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis determined the measurement with the best discriminatory power providing a cutoff value, maximizing both sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The only statistically significant variables differing between all three groups were the EDI and the DI. The EDI showed an excellent area under the ROC curve (0.99, p < 0.001) with a cutoff value of 0.39 (98% sensitivity, 96% specificity), followed by DI (0.87, p < 0.001) with a cutoff score of > 25 (83% sensitivity and 78% specificity). CONCLUSION: In patients with dyspnea of unknown cause, an increase in EDI should arouse a suspicion of extrathoracic airway obstruction, advocating for further evaluation with laryngotracheoscopy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-08141-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-08-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10562276/ /pubmed/37540269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08141-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Laryngology Ntouniadakis, Eleftherios Sundh, Josefin Söderqvist, Jeanette von Beckerath, Mathias How can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease? |
title | How can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease? |
title_full | How can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease? |
title_fullStr | How can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease? |
title_full_unstemmed | How can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease? |
title_short | How can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease? |
title_sort | how can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease? |
topic | Laryngology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37540269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08141-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ntouniadakiseleftherios howcanweidentifysubglotticstenosisinpatientswithsuspectedobstructivedisease AT sundhjosefin howcanweidentifysubglotticstenosisinpatientswithsuspectedobstructivedisease AT soderqvistjeanette howcanweidentifysubglotticstenosisinpatientswithsuspectedobstructivedisease AT vonbeckerathmathias howcanweidentifysubglotticstenosisinpatientswithsuspectedobstructivedisease |