Cargando…

EAONO/JOS classification for acquired cholesteatoma: evaluating the impact of the number of affected sites on treatment and outcomes

PURPOSE: The European and Japanese system for cholesteatoma classification proposed an anatomical differentiation in five sites. In stage I disease, one site would be affected and in stage II, two to five. We tested the significance of this differentiation by analyzing the influence of the number of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renner, B., Vasconcelos Craveiro, A., Balk, M., Allner, M., Sievert, M., Mueller, S. K., Mantsopoulos, K., Iro, H., Rupp, R., Hornung, J., Gostian, A. O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37219684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07996-w
_version_ 1785118096499933184
author Renner, B.
Vasconcelos Craveiro, A.
Balk, M.
Allner, M.
Sievert, M.
Mueller, S. K.
Mantsopoulos, K.
Iro, H.
Rupp, R.
Hornung, J.
Gostian, A. O.
author_facet Renner, B.
Vasconcelos Craveiro, A.
Balk, M.
Allner, M.
Sievert, M.
Mueller, S. K.
Mantsopoulos, K.
Iro, H.
Rupp, R.
Hornung, J.
Gostian, A. O.
author_sort Renner, B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The European and Japanese system for cholesteatoma classification proposed an anatomical differentiation in five sites. In stage I disease, one site would be affected and in stage II, two to five. We tested the significance of this differentiation by analyzing the influence of the number of affected sites on residual disease, hearing ability and surgical complexity. METHODS: Cases of acquired cholesteatoma treated at a single tertiary referral center between 2010-01-01 and 2019-07-31 were retrospectively analyzed. Residual disease was determined according to the system. The air–bone gap mean of 0.5, 1, 2, 3 kHz (ABG) and its change with surgery served as hearing outcome. The surgical complexity was estimated regarding the Wullstein’s tympanoplasty classification and the procedure approach (transcanal, canal up/down). RESULTS: 513 ears (431 patients) were followed-up during 21.6 ± 21.5 months. 107 (20.9%) ears had one site affected, 130 (25.3%) two, 157 (30.6%) three, 72 (14.0%) four and 47 (9.2%) five. An increasing number of affected sites resulted in higher residual rates (9.4–21.3%, p = 0.008) and surgical complexity, as well poorer ABG (preoperative 14.1 to 25.3 dB, postoperative 11.3–16.8 dB, p < 0.001). These differences existed between the means of cases of stage I and II, but also when only considering ears with stage II classification. CONCLUSION: The data showed statistically significant differences when comparing the averages of ears with two to five affected sites, questioning the pertinence of the differentiation between stages I and II. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-07996-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10562301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105623012023-10-11 EAONO/JOS classification for acquired cholesteatoma: evaluating the impact of the number of affected sites on treatment and outcomes Renner, B. Vasconcelos Craveiro, A. Balk, M. Allner, M. Sievert, M. Mueller, S. K. Mantsopoulos, K. Iro, H. Rupp, R. Hornung, J. Gostian, A. O. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: The European and Japanese system for cholesteatoma classification proposed an anatomical differentiation in five sites. In stage I disease, one site would be affected and in stage II, two to five. We tested the significance of this differentiation by analyzing the influence of the number of affected sites on residual disease, hearing ability and surgical complexity. METHODS: Cases of acquired cholesteatoma treated at a single tertiary referral center between 2010-01-01 and 2019-07-31 were retrospectively analyzed. Residual disease was determined according to the system. The air–bone gap mean of 0.5, 1, 2, 3 kHz (ABG) and its change with surgery served as hearing outcome. The surgical complexity was estimated regarding the Wullstein’s tympanoplasty classification and the procedure approach (transcanal, canal up/down). RESULTS: 513 ears (431 patients) were followed-up during 21.6 ± 21.5 months. 107 (20.9%) ears had one site affected, 130 (25.3%) two, 157 (30.6%) three, 72 (14.0%) four and 47 (9.2%) five. An increasing number of affected sites resulted in higher residual rates (9.4–21.3%, p = 0.008) and surgical complexity, as well poorer ABG (preoperative 14.1 to 25.3 dB, postoperative 11.3–16.8 dB, p < 0.001). These differences existed between the means of cases of stage I and II, but also when only considering ears with stage II classification. CONCLUSION: The data showed statistically significant differences when comparing the averages of ears with two to five affected sites, questioning the pertinence of the differentiation between stages I and II. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-07996-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10562301/ /pubmed/37219684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07996-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Otology
Renner, B.
Vasconcelos Craveiro, A.
Balk, M.
Allner, M.
Sievert, M.
Mueller, S. K.
Mantsopoulos, K.
Iro, H.
Rupp, R.
Hornung, J.
Gostian, A. O.
EAONO/JOS classification for acquired cholesteatoma: evaluating the impact of the number of affected sites on treatment and outcomes
title EAONO/JOS classification for acquired cholesteatoma: evaluating the impact of the number of affected sites on treatment and outcomes
title_full EAONO/JOS classification for acquired cholesteatoma: evaluating the impact of the number of affected sites on treatment and outcomes
title_fullStr EAONO/JOS classification for acquired cholesteatoma: evaluating the impact of the number of affected sites on treatment and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed EAONO/JOS classification for acquired cholesteatoma: evaluating the impact of the number of affected sites on treatment and outcomes
title_short EAONO/JOS classification for acquired cholesteatoma: evaluating the impact of the number of affected sites on treatment and outcomes
title_sort eaono/jos classification for acquired cholesteatoma: evaluating the impact of the number of affected sites on treatment and outcomes
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37219684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07996-w
work_keys_str_mv AT rennerb eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes
AT vasconceloscraveiroa eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes
AT balkm eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes
AT allnerm eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes
AT sievertm eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes
AT muellersk eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes
AT mantsopoulosk eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes
AT iroh eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes
AT ruppr eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes
AT hornungj eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes
AT gostianao eaonojosclassificationforacquiredcholesteatomaevaluatingtheimpactofthenumberofaffectedsitesontreatmentandoutcomes