Cargando…
Input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features
Detailed spatial data are an essential part of land use planning and decision-making. Their spatial resolution sets limitations to their use, as coarse datasets are not suitable for detecting small-scale phenomena. In this study, we explored the effects of spatial resolution on the ecological outcom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01885-6 |
_version_ | 1785118108299558912 |
---|---|
author | Tanhuanpää, Topi Mikkonen, Ninni Kujala, Heini Heinaro, Einari Mäyrä, Janne Kumpula, Timo |
author_facet | Tanhuanpää, Topi Mikkonen, Ninni Kujala, Heini Heinaro, Einari Mäyrä, Janne Kumpula, Timo |
author_sort | Tanhuanpää, Topi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Detailed spatial data are an essential part of land use planning and decision-making. Their spatial resolution sets limitations to their use, as coarse datasets are not suitable for detecting small-scale phenomena. In this study, we explored the effects of spatial resolution on the ecological outcome of a conservation prioritization process in Zonation software. Our study area was in Evo, southern Finland, covering a mosaic of managed and conserved forests. We produced the feature layers describing the forest characteristics using high-resolution remote sensing datasets, object-based mapping methods, and forest site type data. We found that increasing the resolution above the 16 m baseline resolution resulted in substantial errors. The conservation errors were the highest for rare features related to European Aspen, whereas the common features related to dominant tree species could benefit from the growth of cell size. We conclude that adequate spatial resolution is a prerequisite for efficient conservation prioritization, and that the size and spatial distribution of the features affect the resolution requirements. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13280-023-01885-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10562354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105623542023-10-11 Input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features Tanhuanpää, Topi Mikkonen, Ninni Kujala, Heini Heinaro, Einari Mäyrä, Janne Kumpula, Timo Ambio Carbon Sequestration and Biodiversity Impacts in Forested Ecosystems Detailed spatial data are an essential part of land use planning and decision-making. Their spatial resolution sets limitations to their use, as coarse datasets are not suitable for detecting small-scale phenomena. In this study, we explored the effects of spatial resolution on the ecological outcome of a conservation prioritization process in Zonation software. Our study area was in Evo, southern Finland, covering a mosaic of managed and conserved forests. We produced the feature layers describing the forest characteristics using high-resolution remote sensing datasets, object-based mapping methods, and forest site type data. We found that increasing the resolution above the 16 m baseline resolution resulted in substantial errors. The conservation errors were the highest for rare features related to European Aspen, whereas the common features related to dominant tree species could benefit from the growth of cell size. We conclude that adequate spatial resolution is a prerequisite for efficient conservation prioritization, and that the size and spatial distribution of the features affect the resolution requirements. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13280-023-01885-6. Springer Netherlands 2023-06-02 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10562354/ /pubmed/37266861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01885-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Carbon Sequestration and Biodiversity Impacts in Forested Ecosystems Tanhuanpää, Topi Mikkonen, Ninni Kujala, Heini Heinaro, Einari Mäyrä, Janne Kumpula, Timo Input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features |
title | Input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features |
title_full | Input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features |
title_fullStr | Input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features |
title_full_unstemmed | Input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features |
title_short | Input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features |
title_sort | input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features |
topic | Carbon Sequestration and Biodiversity Impacts in Forested Ecosystems |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01885-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanhuanpaatopi inputdataresolutionaffectstheconservationprioritizationoutcomeofspatiallysparsebiodiversityfeatures AT mikkonenninni inputdataresolutionaffectstheconservationprioritizationoutcomeofspatiallysparsebiodiversityfeatures AT kujalaheini inputdataresolutionaffectstheconservationprioritizationoutcomeofspatiallysparsebiodiversityfeatures AT heinaroeinari inputdataresolutionaffectstheconservationprioritizationoutcomeofspatiallysparsebiodiversityfeatures AT mayrajanne inputdataresolutionaffectstheconservationprioritizationoutcomeofspatiallysparsebiodiversityfeatures AT kumpulatimo inputdataresolutionaffectstheconservationprioritizationoutcomeofspatiallysparsebiodiversityfeatures |