Cargando…
The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures: Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures?
BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical treatment for patients presenting with (impending and complete) pathological proximal femoral fractures is predicated on prognosis. Guidelines recommend a preoperative biopsy to exclude sarcomas, however no evidence confirms a benefit. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13931-4 |
_version_ | 1785118144083263488 |
---|---|
author | Verspoor, Floortje G. M. Hannink, Gerjon Parry, Michael Jeys, Lee Stevenson, Jonathan D. |
author_facet | Verspoor, Floortje G. M. Hannink, Gerjon Parry, Michael Jeys, Lee Stevenson, Jonathan D. |
author_sort | Verspoor, Floortje G. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical treatment for patients presenting with (impending and complete) pathological proximal femoral fractures is predicated on prognosis. Guidelines recommend a preoperative biopsy to exclude sarcomas, however no evidence confirms a benefit. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the diagnostic accuracy, morbidity and sarcoma incidence of biopsy results in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients (n = 153) presenting with pathological proximal femoral fractures between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients after inadvertent surgery (n = 25) were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the accuracy and morbidity of diagnostic biopsies. RESULTS: Of 112/128 patients who underwent biopsy, nine (8%) biopsies were unreliable either due to being inconclusive (n = 5) or because the diagnosis changed after resection (n = 4). Of impending fractures, 32% fractured following needle core biopsy. Median time from diagnosis to surgery was 30 days (interquartile range 21–46). The overall biopsy positive predictive value (PPV) to differentiate between sarcoma and non-sarcoma was 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–1.00). In patients with a previous malignancy (n = 24), biopsy (n = 23) identified the diagnosis in 83% (PPV 0.91, 95% CI 0.71–0.99), of whom five (24%) patients had a new diagnosis. In patients without a history of cancer (n = 61), final diagnosis included carcinomas (n = 24, 39.3%), sarcomas (n = 24, 39.3%), or hematological malignancies (n = 13, 21.3%). Biopsy (n = 58) correctly identified the diagnosis in 66% of patients (PPV 0.80, 95% CI 0.67–0.90). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of a preoperative biopsy in solitary pathological proximal femoral fractures due to the risk of sarcoma in patients with and without a history of cancer. However, biopsy delays the time to definite surgery, results can be inconclusive or false, and it risks completion of impending fractures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10562502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105625022023-10-11 The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures: Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures? Verspoor, Floortje G. M. Hannink, Gerjon Parry, Michael Jeys, Lee Stevenson, Jonathan D. Ann Surg Oncol Sarcoma BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical treatment for patients presenting with (impending and complete) pathological proximal femoral fractures is predicated on prognosis. Guidelines recommend a preoperative biopsy to exclude sarcomas, however no evidence confirms a benefit. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the diagnostic accuracy, morbidity and sarcoma incidence of biopsy results in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients (n = 153) presenting with pathological proximal femoral fractures between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients after inadvertent surgery (n = 25) were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the accuracy and morbidity of diagnostic biopsies. RESULTS: Of 112/128 patients who underwent biopsy, nine (8%) biopsies were unreliable either due to being inconclusive (n = 5) or because the diagnosis changed after resection (n = 4). Of impending fractures, 32% fractured following needle core biopsy. Median time from diagnosis to surgery was 30 days (interquartile range 21–46). The overall biopsy positive predictive value (PPV) to differentiate between sarcoma and non-sarcoma was 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–1.00). In patients with a previous malignancy (n = 24), biopsy (n = 23) identified the diagnosis in 83% (PPV 0.91, 95% CI 0.71–0.99), of whom five (24%) patients had a new diagnosis. In patients without a history of cancer (n = 61), final diagnosis included carcinomas (n = 24, 39.3%), sarcomas (n = 24, 39.3%), or hematological malignancies (n = 13, 21.3%). Biopsy (n = 58) correctly identified the diagnosis in 66% of patients (PPV 0.80, 95% CI 0.67–0.90). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of a preoperative biopsy in solitary pathological proximal femoral fractures due to the risk of sarcoma in patients with and without a history of cancer. However, biopsy delays the time to definite surgery, results can be inconclusive or false, and it risks completion of impending fractures. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10562502/ /pubmed/37505350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13931-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Sarcoma Verspoor, Floortje G. M. Hannink, Gerjon Parry, Michael Jeys, Lee Stevenson, Jonathan D. The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures: Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures? |
title | The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures: Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures? |
title_full | The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures: Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures? |
title_fullStr | The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures: Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures: Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures? |
title_short | The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures: Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures? |
title_sort | importance of awaiting biopsy results in solitary pathological proximal femoral fractures: do we need to biopsy solitary pathological fractures? |
topic | Sarcoma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13931-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verspoorfloortjegm theimportanceofawaitingbiopsyresultsinsolitarypathologicalproximalfemoralfracturesdoweneedtobiopsysolitarypathologicalfractures AT hanninkgerjon theimportanceofawaitingbiopsyresultsinsolitarypathologicalproximalfemoralfracturesdoweneedtobiopsysolitarypathologicalfractures AT parrymichael theimportanceofawaitingbiopsyresultsinsolitarypathologicalproximalfemoralfracturesdoweneedtobiopsysolitarypathologicalfractures AT jeyslee theimportanceofawaitingbiopsyresultsinsolitarypathologicalproximalfemoralfracturesdoweneedtobiopsysolitarypathologicalfractures AT stevensonjonathand theimportanceofawaitingbiopsyresultsinsolitarypathologicalproximalfemoralfracturesdoweneedtobiopsysolitarypathologicalfractures AT verspoorfloortjegm importanceofawaitingbiopsyresultsinsolitarypathologicalproximalfemoralfracturesdoweneedtobiopsysolitarypathologicalfractures AT hanninkgerjon importanceofawaitingbiopsyresultsinsolitarypathologicalproximalfemoralfracturesdoweneedtobiopsysolitarypathologicalfractures AT parrymichael importanceofawaitingbiopsyresultsinsolitarypathologicalproximalfemoralfracturesdoweneedtobiopsysolitarypathologicalfractures AT jeyslee importanceofawaitingbiopsyresultsinsolitarypathologicalproximalfemoralfracturesdoweneedtobiopsysolitarypathologicalfractures AT stevensonjonathand importanceofawaitingbiopsyresultsinsolitarypathologicalproximalfemoralfracturesdoweneedtobiopsysolitarypathologicalfractures |