Cargando…

Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of total contact casts (TCCs) versus removable offloading interventions among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in databases Embase, Cochrane Library, and, PubMed. The references of retrieved...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Bin, Lin, Aifang, Huang, Jianping, Xie, Jianying, Liu, Quanyong, Yang, Chenxi, Zhang, Zhengmao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822605
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1234761
_version_ 1785118183554809856
author Li, Bin
Lin, Aifang
Huang, Jianping
Xie, Jianying
Liu, Quanyong
Yang, Chenxi
Zhang, Zhengmao
author_facet Li, Bin
Lin, Aifang
Huang, Jianping
Xie, Jianying
Liu, Quanyong
Yang, Chenxi
Zhang, Zhengmao
author_sort Li, Bin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of total contact casts (TCCs) versus removable offloading interventions among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in databases Embase, Cochrane Library, and, PubMed. The references of retrieved articles were reviewed, up until February 2023. Controlled trials comparing the effects of TCCs with removable offloading interventions (removable walking casts and footwear) in patients with DFUs were eligible for review. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 591 patients with DFUs. Among them, 269 patients were in the intervention group (TCC), and 322 in the control group (removable walking casts/footwear). The analysis revealed that the TCC group had higher healing rates (Risk Ratio(RR)=1.22; 95% confidence interval(CI):1.11 to 1.34, p<0.001), shorter healing time (Standard Mean Difference(SMD)=-0.57; 95%CI: -1.01 to -0.13, P=0.010), and elevated occurrence of device-related complications (RR=1.70; 95%CI:1.01 to 2.88, P=0.047), compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis illustrated patients using TCCs had higher healing rates than those using removable walking casts (RR=1.20; 95%CI:1.08 to 1.34, p=0.001) and footwear (RR=1.25; 95%CI:1.04 to 1.51, p=0.019), but they required comparable time for ulcer healing compared with those using removable walking casts (SMD=-0.60; 95%CI: -1.22 to 0.02, P=0.058) or footwear group (SMD=-0.52; 95%CI: -1.17 to 0.12, P=0.110). Although patients using TCCs had significantly higher incidence of device-related complications than those using footwear (RR=4.81; 95%CI:1.30 to 17.74, p=0.018), they had similar one compared with those using the removable walking casts (RR=1.27; 95%CI:0.70 to 2.29, p=0.438). CONCLUSION: The use of TCCs in patients with DFUs resulted in improved rates of ulcer healing and shorter healing time compared to removable walking casts and footwear. However, it is important to note that TCCs were found to be associated with increased prevalence of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10562689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105626892023-10-11 Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Bin Lin, Aifang Huang, Jianping Xie, Jianying Liu, Quanyong Yang, Chenxi Zhang, Zhengmao Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of total contact casts (TCCs) versus removable offloading interventions among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in databases Embase, Cochrane Library, and, PubMed. The references of retrieved articles were reviewed, up until February 2023. Controlled trials comparing the effects of TCCs with removable offloading interventions (removable walking casts and footwear) in patients with DFUs were eligible for review. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 591 patients with DFUs. Among them, 269 patients were in the intervention group (TCC), and 322 in the control group (removable walking casts/footwear). The analysis revealed that the TCC group had higher healing rates (Risk Ratio(RR)=1.22; 95% confidence interval(CI):1.11 to 1.34, p<0.001), shorter healing time (Standard Mean Difference(SMD)=-0.57; 95%CI: -1.01 to -0.13, P=0.010), and elevated occurrence of device-related complications (RR=1.70; 95%CI:1.01 to 2.88, P=0.047), compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis illustrated patients using TCCs had higher healing rates than those using removable walking casts (RR=1.20; 95%CI:1.08 to 1.34, p=0.001) and footwear (RR=1.25; 95%CI:1.04 to 1.51, p=0.019), but they required comparable time for ulcer healing compared with those using removable walking casts (SMD=-0.60; 95%CI: -1.22 to 0.02, P=0.058) or footwear group (SMD=-0.52; 95%CI: -1.17 to 0.12, P=0.110). Although patients using TCCs had significantly higher incidence of device-related complications than those using footwear (RR=4.81; 95%CI:1.30 to 17.74, p=0.018), they had similar one compared with those using the removable walking casts (RR=1.27; 95%CI:0.70 to 2.29, p=0.438). CONCLUSION: The use of TCCs in patients with DFUs resulted in improved rates of ulcer healing and shorter healing time compared to removable walking casts and footwear. However, it is important to note that TCCs were found to be associated with increased prevalence of complications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10562689/ /pubmed/37822605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1234761 Text en Copyright © 2023 Li, Lin, Huang, Xie, Liu, Yang and Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Li, Bin
Lin, Aifang
Huang, Jianping
Xie, Jianying
Liu, Quanyong
Yang, Chenxi
Zhang, Zhengmao
Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822605
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1234761
work_keys_str_mv AT libin totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linaifang totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangjianping totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiejianying totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuquanyong totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangchenxi totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangzhengmao totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis