Cargando…
Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of total contact casts (TCCs) versus removable offloading interventions among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in databases Embase, Cochrane Library, and, PubMed. The references of retrieved...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1234761 |
_version_ | 1785118183554809856 |
---|---|
author | Li, Bin Lin, Aifang Huang, Jianping Xie, Jianying Liu, Quanyong Yang, Chenxi Zhang, Zhengmao |
author_facet | Li, Bin Lin, Aifang Huang, Jianping Xie, Jianying Liu, Quanyong Yang, Chenxi Zhang, Zhengmao |
author_sort | Li, Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of total contact casts (TCCs) versus removable offloading interventions among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in databases Embase, Cochrane Library, and, PubMed. The references of retrieved articles were reviewed, up until February 2023. Controlled trials comparing the effects of TCCs with removable offloading interventions (removable walking casts and footwear) in patients with DFUs were eligible for review. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 591 patients with DFUs. Among them, 269 patients were in the intervention group (TCC), and 322 in the control group (removable walking casts/footwear). The analysis revealed that the TCC group had higher healing rates (Risk Ratio(RR)=1.22; 95% confidence interval(CI):1.11 to 1.34, p<0.001), shorter healing time (Standard Mean Difference(SMD)=-0.57; 95%CI: -1.01 to -0.13, P=0.010), and elevated occurrence of device-related complications (RR=1.70; 95%CI:1.01 to 2.88, P=0.047), compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis illustrated patients using TCCs had higher healing rates than those using removable walking casts (RR=1.20; 95%CI:1.08 to 1.34, p=0.001) and footwear (RR=1.25; 95%CI:1.04 to 1.51, p=0.019), but they required comparable time for ulcer healing compared with those using removable walking casts (SMD=-0.60; 95%CI: -1.22 to 0.02, P=0.058) or footwear group (SMD=-0.52; 95%CI: -1.17 to 0.12, P=0.110). Although patients using TCCs had significantly higher incidence of device-related complications than those using footwear (RR=4.81; 95%CI:1.30 to 17.74, p=0.018), they had similar one compared with those using the removable walking casts (RR=1.27; 95%CI:0.70 to 2.29, p=0.438). CONCLUSION: The use of TCCs in patients with DFUs resulted in improved rates of ulcer healing and shorter healing time compared to removable walking casts and footwear. However, it is important to note that TCCs were found to be associated with increased prevalence of complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10562689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105626892023-10-11 Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Bin Lin, Aifang Huang, Jianping Xie, Jianying Liu, Quanyong Yang, Chenxi Zhang, Zhengmao Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of total contact casts (TCCs) versus removable offloading interventions among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). METHODS: A comprehensive search was done in databases Embase, Cochrane Library, and, PubMed. The references of retrieved articles were reviewed, up until February 2023. Controlled trials comparing the effects of TCCs with removable offloading interventions (removable walking casts and footwear) in patients with DFUs were eligible for review. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 591 patients with DFUs. Among them, 269 patients were in the intervention group (TCC), and 322 in the control group (removable walking casts/footwear). The analysis revealed that the TCC group had higher healing rates (Risk Ratio(RR)=1.22; 95% confidence interval(CI):1.11 to 1.34, p<0.001), shorter healing time (Standard Mean Difference(SMD)=-0.57; 95%CI: -1.01 to -0.13, P=0.010), and elevated occurrence of device-related complications (RR=1.70; 95%CI:1.01 to 2.88, P=0.047), compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis illustrated patients using TCCs had higher healing rates than those using removable walking casts (RR=1.20; 95%CI:1.08 to 1.34, p=0.001) and footwear (RR=1.25; 95%CI:1.04 to 1.51, p=0.019), but they required comparable time for ulcer healing compared with those using removable walking casts (SMD=-0.60; 95%CI: -1.22 to 0.02, P=0.058) or footwear group (SMD=-0.52; 95%CI: -1.17 to 0.12, P=0.110). Although patients using TCCs had significantly higher incidence of device-related complications than those using footwear (RR=4.81; 95%CI:1.30 to 17.74, p=0.018), they had similar one compared with those using the removable walking casts (RR=1.27; 95%CI:0.70 to 2.29, p=0.438). CONCLUSION: The use of TCCs in patients with DFUs resulted in improved rates of ulcer healing and shorter healing time compared to removable walking casts and footwear. However, it is important to note that TCCs were found to be associated with increased prevalence of complications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10562689/ /pubmed/37822605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1234761 Text en Copyright © 2023 Li, Lin, Huang, Xie, Liu, Yang and Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Li, Bin Lin, Aifang Huang, Jianping Xie, Jianying Liu, Quanyong Yang, Chenxi Zhang, Zhengmao Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | total contact casts versus removable offloading interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1234761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT libin totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linaifang totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huangjianping totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiejianying totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuquanyong totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangchenxi totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangzhengmao totalcontactcastsversusremovableoffloadinginterventionsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |