Cargando…
Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy
Introduction: Musculoskeletal model-based simulations have gained popularity as a tool for analyzing human movement biomechanics. However, when examining the same gait, different models with varying anatomical data and assumptions may produce inconsistent biomechanical results. This inconsistency is...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37823025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1217918 |
_version_ | 1785118192765501440 |
---|---|
author | Jing, Zhibo Han, Jianda Zhang, Juanjuan |
author_facet | Jing, Zhibo Han, Jianda Zhang, Juanjuan |
author_sort | Jing, Zhibo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Musculoskeletal model-based simulations have gained popularity as a tool for analyzing human movement biomechanics. However, when examining the same gait, different models with varying anatomical data and assumptions may produce inconsistent biomechanical results. This inconsistency is particularly relevant for children with cerebral palsy, who often exhibit multiple pathological gait patterns that can impact model outputs. Methods: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of selecting musculoskeletal models on the biomechanical analysis results in children with cerebral palsy. Gait data were collected from multiple participants at slow, medium, and fast velocities. Joint kinematics, joint dynamics, and muscle activation were calculated using six popular musculoskeletal models within a biomechanical simulation environment. Results: The degree of inconsistency, measured as the root-mean-square deviation, in kinematic and kinetic results produced by the different models ranged from 4% to 40% joint motion range and 0%–28% joint moment range, respectively. The correlation between the results of the different models (both kinematic and kinetic) was good (R [Formula: see text] 0.85, P [Formula: see text] 0.01), with a stronger correlation observed in the kinetic results. Four of the six models showed a positive correlation between the simulated muscle activation of rectus femoris and the surface EMG, while all models exhibited a positive correlation between the activation of medial gastrocnemius and the surface EMG (P [Formula: see text] 0.01). Discussion: These results provide insights into the consistency of model results, factors influencing consistency, characteristics of each model’s outputs, mechanisms underlying these characteristics, and feasible applications for each model. By elucidating the impact of model selection on biomechanical analysis outcomes, this study advances the field’s understanding of musculoskeletal modeling and its implications for clinical gait analysis model decision-making in children with cerebral palsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10562727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105627272023-10-11 Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy Jing, Zhibo Han, Jianda Zhang, Juanjuan Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Introduction: Musculoskeletal model-based simulations have gained popularity as a tool for analyzing human movement biomechanics. However, when examining the same gait, different models with varying anatomical data and assumptions may produce inconsistent biomechanical results. This inconsistency is particularly relevant for children with cerebral palsy, who often exhibit multiple pathological gait patterns that can impact model outputs. Methods: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of selecting musculoskeletal models on the biomechanical analysis results in children with cerebral palsy. Gait data were collected from multiple participants at slow, medium, and fast velocities. Joint kinematics, joint dynamics, and muscle activation were calculated using six popular musculoskeletal models within a biomechanical simulation environment. Results: The degree of inconsistency, measured as the root-mean-square deviation, in kinematic and kinetic results produced by the different models ranged from 4% to 40% joint motion range and 0%–28% joint moment range, respectively. The correlation between the results of the different models (both kinematic and kinetic) was good (R [Formula: see text] 0.85, P [Formula: see text] 0.01), with a stronger correlation observed in the kinetic results. Four of the six models showed a positive correlation between the simulated muscle activation of rectus femoris and the surface EMG, while all models exhibited a positive correlation between the activation of medial gastrocnemius and the surface EMG (P [Formula: see text] 0.01). Discussion: These results provide insights into the consistency of model results, factors influencing consistency, characteristics of each model’s outputs, mechanisms underlying these characteristics, and feasible applications for each model. By elucidating the impact of model selection on biomechanical analysis outcomes, this study advances the field’s understanding of musculoskeletal modeling and its implications for clinical gait analysis model decision-making in children with cerebral palsy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10562727/ /pubmed/37823025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1217918 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jing, Han and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Jing, Zhibo Han, Jianda Zhang, Juanjuan Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy |
title | Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy |
title_full | Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy |
title_short | Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy |
title_sort | comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37823025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1217918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jingzhibo comparisonofbiomechanicalanalysisresultsusingdifferentmusculoskeletalmodelsforchildrenwithcerebralpalsy AT hanjianda comparisonofbiomechanicalanalysisresultsusingdifferentmusculoskeletalmodelsforchildrenwithcerebralpalsy AT zhangjuanjuan comparisonofbiomechanicalanalysisresultsusingdifferentmusculoskeletalmodelsforchildrenwithcerebralpalsy |