Cargando…

Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy

Introduction: Musculoskeletal model-based simulations have gained popularity as a tool for analyzing human movement biomechanics. However, when examining the same gait, different models with varying anatomical data and assumptions may produce inconsistent biomechanical results. This inconsistency is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jing, Zhibo, Han, Jianda, Zhang, Juanjuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37823025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1217918
_version_ 1785118192765501440
author Jing, Zhibo
Han, Jianda
Zhang, Juanjuan
author_facet Jing, Zhibo
Han, Jianda
Zhang, Juanjuan
author_sort Jing, Zhibo
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Musculoskeletal model-based simulations have gained popularity as a tool for analyzing human movement biomechanics. However, when examining the same gait, different models with varying anatomical data and assumptions may produce inconsistent biomechanical results. This inconsistency is particularly relevant for children with cerebral palsy, who often exhibit multiple pathological gait patterns that can impact model outputs. Methods: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of selecting musculoskeletal models on the biomechanical analysis results in children with cerebral palsy. Gait data were collected from multiple participants at slow, medium, and fast velocities. Joint kinematics, joint dynamics, and muscle activation were calculated using six popular musculoskeletal models within a biomechanical simulation environment. Results: The degree of inconsistency, measured as the root-mean-square deviation, in kinematic and kinetic results produced by the different models ranged from 4% to 40% joint motion range and 0%–28% joint moment range, respectively. The correlation between the results of the different models (both kinematic and kinetic) was good (R [Formula: see text] 0.85, P [Formula: see text] 0.01), with a stronger correlation observed in the kinetic results. Four of the six models showed a positive correlation between the simulated muscle activation of rectus femoris and the surface EMG, while all models exhibited a positive correlation between the activation of medial gastrocnemius and the surface EMG (P [Formula: see text] 0.01). Discussion: These results provide insights into the consistency of model results, factors influencing consistency, characteristics of each model’s outputs, mechanisms underlying these characteristics, and feasible applications for each model. By elucidating the impact of model selection on biomechanical analysis outcomes, this study advances the field’s understanding of musculoskeletal modeling and its implications for clinical gait analysis model decision-making in children with cerebral palsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10562727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105627272023-10-11 Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy Jing, Zhibo Han, Jianda Zhang, Juanjuan Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Introduction: Musculoskeletal model-based simulations have gained popularity as a tool for analyzing human movement biomechanics. However, when examining the same gait, different models with varying anatomical data and assumptions may produce inconsistent biomechanical results. This inconsistency is particularly relevant for children with cerebral palsy, who often exhibit multiple pathological gait patterns that can impact model outputs. Methods: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of selecting musculoskeletal models on the biomechanical analysis results in children with cerebral palsy. Gait data were collected from multiple participants at slow, medium, and fast velocities. Joint kinematics, joint dynamics, and muscle activation were calculated using six popular musculoskeletal models within a biomechanical simulation environment. Results: The degree of inconsistency, measured as the root-mean-square deviation, in kinematic and kinetic results produced by the different models ranged from 4% to 40% joint motion range and 0%–28% joint moment range, respectively. The correlation between the results of the different models (both kinematic and kinetic) was good (R [Formula: see text] 0.85, P [Formula: see text] 0.01), with a stronger correlation observed in the kinetic results. Four of the six models showed a positive correlation between the simulated muscle activation of rectus femoris and the surface EMG, while all models exhibited a positive correlation between the activation of medial gastrocnemius and the surface EMG (P [Formula: see text] 0.01). Discussion: These results provide insights into the consistency of model results, factors influencing consistency, characteristics of each model’s outputs, mechanisms underlying these characteristics, and feasible applications for each model. By elucidating the impact of model selection on biomechanical analysis outcomes, this study advances the field’s understanding of musculoskeletal modeling and its implications for clinical gait analysis model decision-making in children with cerebral palsy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10562727/ /pubmed/37823025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1217918 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jing, Han and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Jing, Zhibo
Han, Jianda
Zhang, Juanjuan
Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy
title Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy
title_full Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy
title_fullStr Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy
title_short Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy
title_sort comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37823025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1217918
work_keys_str_mv AT jingzhibo comparisonofbiomechanicalanalysisresultsusingdifferentmusculoskeletalmodelsforchildrenwithcerebralpalsy
AT hanjianda comparisonofbiomechanicalanalysisresultsusingdifferentmusculoskeletalmodelsforchildrenwithcerebralpalsy
AT zhangjuanjuan comparisonofbiomechanicalanalysisresultsusingdifferentmusculoskeletalmodelsforchildrenwithcerebralpalsy