Cargando…

Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse

BACKGROUND: Evidenced-based interventions have been developed to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer, including VTE-risk assessment for all patients and targeted primary thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Despite supportive evidence and recommendations, on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Karlyn A., Cameron, Kenzie A., Lyleroehr, Madison J., Linder, Jeffrey A., O’Brien, Matt, Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102173
_version_ 1785118233433473024
author Martin, Karlyn A.
Cameron, Kenzie A.
Lyleroehr, Madison J.
Linder, Jeffrey A.
O’Brien, Matt
Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
author_facet Martin, Karlyn A.
Cameron, Kenzie A.
Lyleroehr, Madison J.
Linder, Jeffrey A.
O’Brien, Matt
Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
author_sort Martin, Karlyn A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidenced-based interventions have been developed to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer, including VTE-risk assessment for all patients and targeted primary thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Despite supportive evidence and recommendations, oncologists rarely assess VTE risk or provide primary prophylaxis. Our previous work identified barriers and facilitators to using VTE prevention interventions in oncology practice. OBJECTIVES: To identify potential strategies that address the identified barriers and leverage facilitators to achieve successful implementation of evidence-based interventions for VTE prevention in oncology practice. METHODS: We used the Implementation Research Logic Model, an implementation science framework, to map the relationships among barriers and facilitators, feasible and effective implementation strategies, and implementation and clinical outcomes that will be used to evaluate the implementation strategies. RESULTS: We identified 12 discrete implementation strategies (eg, conducting clinician education and training and staged implementation scale-up) that address barriers and leverage facilitators through their mechanisms of action (eg, increased clinician awareness of evidence and targeting the highest effectiveness). We identified key implementation (eg, penetration, adoption, acceptability, fidelity, appropriateness, and sustainability), system (eg, integration of VTE-risk assessment into clinical workflow), and clinical (eg, lower VTE rates) outcomes targeted by the selected strategies. CONCLUSION: Using the Implementation Research Logic Model framework and building on our knowledge of barriers and facilitators, we identified implementation strategies and important outcomes to evaluate these strategies. We will use these results to test and measure the strategies to improve the uptake of evidence-based recommendations for VTE prevention in oncology practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10562910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105629102023-10-11 Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse Martin, Karlyn A. Cameron, Kenzie A. Lyleroehr, Madison J. Linder, Jeffrey A. O’Brien, Matt Hirschhorn, Lisa R. Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Article BACKGROUND: Evidenced-based interventions have been developed to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer, including VTE-risk assessment for all patients and targeted primary thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Despite supportive evidence and recommendations, oncologists rarely assess VTE risk or provide primary prophylaxis. Our previous work identified barriers and facilitators to using VTE prevention interventions in oncology practice. OBJECTIVES: To identify potential strategies that address the identified barriers and leverage facilitators to achieve successful implementation of evidence-based interventions for VTE prevention in oncology practice. METHODS: We used the Implementation Research Logic Model, an implementation science framework, to map the relationships among barriers and facilitators, feasible and effective implementation strategies, and implementation and clinical outcomes that will be used to evaluate the implementation strategies. RESULTS: We identified 12 discrete implementation strategies (eg, conducting clinician education and training and staged implementation scale-up) that address barriers and leverage facilitators through their mechanisms of action (eg, increased clinician awareness of evidence and targeting the highest effectiveness). We identified key implementation (eg, penetration, adoption, acceptability, fidelity, appropriateness, and sustainability), system (eg, integration of VTE-risk assessment into clinical workflow), and clinical (eg, lower VTE rates) outcomes targeted by the selected strategies. CONCLUSION: Using the Implementation Research Logic Model framework and building on our knowledge of barriers and facilitators, we identified implementation strategies and important outcomes to evaluate these strategies. We will use these results to test and measure the strategies to improve the uptake of evidence-based recommendations for VTE prevention in oncology practice. Elsevier 2023-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10562910/ /pubmed/37822563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102173 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Martin, Karlyn A.
Cameron, Kenzie A.
Lyleroehr, Madison J.
Linder, Jeffrey A.
O’Brien, Matt
Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse
title Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse
title_full Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse
title_fullStr Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse
title_full_unstemmed Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse
title_short Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse
title_sort venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102173
work_keys_str_mv AT martinkarlyna venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse
AT cameronkenziea venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse
AT lyleroehrmadisonj venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse
AT linderjeffreya venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse
AT obrienmatt venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse
AT hirschhornlisar venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse