Cargando…
Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse
BACKGROUND: Evidenced-based interventions have been developed to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer, including VTE-risk assessment for all patients and targeted primary thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Despite supportive evidence and recommendations, on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102173 |
_version_ | 1785118233433473024 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Karlyn A. Cameron, Kenzie A. Lyleroehr, Madison J. Linder, Jeffrey A. O’Brien, Matt Hirschhorn, Lisa R. |
author_facet | Martin, Karlyn A. Cameron, Kenzie A. Lyleroehr, Madison J. Linder, Jeffrey A. O’Brien, Matt Hirschhorn, Lisa R. |
author_sort | Martin, Karlyn A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evidenced-based interventions have been developed to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer, including VTE-risk assessment for all patients and targeted primary thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Despite supportive evidence and recommendations, oncologists rarely assess VTE risk or provide primary prophylaxis. Our previous work identified barriers and facilitators to using VTE prevention interventions in oncology practice. OBJECTIVES: To identify potential strategies that address the identified barriers and leverage facilitators to achieve successful implementation of evidence-based interventions for VTE prevention in oncology practice. METHODS: We used the Implementation Research Logic Model, an implementation science framework, to map the relationships among barriers and facilitators, feasible and effective implementation strategies, and implementation and clinical outcomes that will be used to evaluate the implementation strategies. RESULTS: We identified 12 discrete implementation strategies (eg, conducting clinician education and training and staged implementation scale-up) that address barriers and leverage facilitators through their mechanisms of action (eg, increased clinician awareness of evidence and targeting the highest effectiveness). We identified key implementation (eg, penetration, adoption, acceptability, fidelity, appropriateness, and sustainability), system (eg, integration of VTE-risk assessment into clinical workflow), and clinical (eg, lower VTE rates) outcomes targeted by the selected strategies. CONCLUSION: Using the Implementation Research Logic Model framework and building on our knowledge of barriers and facilitators, we identified implementation strategies and important outcomes to evaluate these strategies. We will use these results to test and measure the strategies to improve the uptake of evidence-based recommendations for VTE prevention in oncology practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10562910 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105629102023-10-11 Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse Martin, Karlyn A. Cameron, Kenzie A. Lyleroehr, Madison J. Linder, Jeffrey A. O’Brien, Matt Hirschhorn, Lisa R. Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Article BACKGROUND: Evidenced-based interventions have been developed to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer, including VTE-risk assessment for all patients and targeted primary thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Despite supportive evidence and recommendations, oncologists rarely assess VTE risk or provide primary prophylaxis. Our previous work identified barriers and facilitators to using VTE prevention interventions in oncology practice. OBJECTIVES: To identify potential strategies that address the identified barriers and leverage facilitators to achieve successful implementation of evidence-based interventions for VTE prevention in oncology practice. METHODS: We used the Implementation Research Logic Model, an implementation science framework, to map the relationships among barriers and facilitators, feasible and effective implementation strategies, and implementation and clinical outcomes that will be used to evaluate the implementation strategies. RESULTS: We identified 12 discrete implementation strategies (eg, conducting clinician education and training and staged implementation scale-up) that address barriers and leverage facilitators through their mechanisms of action (eg, increased clinician awareness of evidence and targeting the highest effectiveness). We identified key implementation (eg, penetration, adoption, acceptability, fidelity, appropriateness, and sustainability), system (eg, integration of VTE-risk assessment into clinical workflow), and clinical (eg, lower VTE rates) outcomes targeted by the selected strategies. CONCLUSION: Using the Implementation Research Logic Model framework and building on our knowledge of barriers and facilitators, we identified implementation strategies and important outcomes to evaluate these strategies. We will use these results to test and measure the strategies to improve the uptake of evidence-based recommendations for VTE prevention in oncology practice. Elsevier 2023-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10562910/ /pubmed/37822563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102173 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Martin, Karlyn A. Cameron, Kenzie A. Lyleroehr, Madison J. Linder, Jeffrey A. O’Brien, Matt Hirschhorn, Lisa R. Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse |
title | Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse |
title_full | Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse |
title_fullStr | Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse |
title_full_unstemmed | Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse |
title_short | Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse |
title_sort | venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinkarlyna venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse AT cameronkenziea venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse AT lyleroehrmadisonj venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse AT linderjeffreya venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse AT obrienmatt venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse AT hirschhornlisar venousthromboembolismpreventionincancercareimplementationstrategiestoaddressunderuse |