Cargando…

Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of different titrated methods used to determine individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for intraoperative mechanical ventilation in female patients undergoing general anesthesia in different operative positions, and prov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shu, Bin, Zhang, Yang, Ren, Qian, Zheng, Xuemei, Zhang, Yamei, Liu, Qi, Li, Shiqi, Chen, Jie, Chen, Yuanjing, Duan, Guangyou, Huang, He
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20552
_version_ 1785118234694909952
author Shu, Bin
Zhang, Yang
Ren, Qian
Zheng, Xuemei
Zhang, Yamei
Liu, Qi
Li, Shiqi
Chen, Jie
Chen, Yuanjing
Duan, Guangyou
Huang, He
author_facet Shu, Bin
Zhang, Yang
Ren, Qian
Zheng, Xuemei
Zhang, Yamei
Liu, Qi
Li, Shiqi
Chen, Jie
Chen, Yuanjing
Duan, Guangyou
Huang, He
author_sort Shu, Bin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of different titrated methods used to determine individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for intraoperative mechanical ventilation in female patients undergoing general anesthesia in different operative positions, and provide reference ranges of optimal PEEP values based on the titration. METHODS: A total of 123 female patients who underwent elective open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. After endotracheal intubation, patients' body position was adjusted to the supine position, Trendelenburg positions at 10° and 20° respectively. PEEP was titrated from 20 cmH(2)O to 4 cmH(2)O, decreasing by 2 cmH(2)O every 1 min. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT), hemodynamic and respiratory mechanics parameters were continuously monitored and recorded. Optimal PEEP values and reference ranges were respectively calculated based on optimal EIT parameters, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and lung dynamic compliance (Cdyn). RESULTS: EIT-guided optimal PEEP was found to have higher values than those of the MAP-guided and Cdyn-guided methods for all three body positions (P < 0.001), and it was observed to more significantly inhibit hemodynamics (P < 0.05). The variable coefficients of EIT-guided optimal PEEP values were smaller than those of the other two methods, and this technique could provide better ventilation uniformity for dorsal/ventral lung fields and better balance for pulmonary atelectasis/collapse. The 95% reference ranges of EIT-guided optimal PEEP values were 4.6–13.8 cmH(2)O, 7.0–15.0 cmH(2)O and 8.6–17.0 cmH(2)O for the supine position, Trendelenburg 10°, and Trendelenburg 20° positions, respectively. CONCLUSION: EIT-guided optimal PEEP titration was found to be a superior method for lung protective ventilation in different operative positions under general anesthesia. The calculated reference ranges of PEEP values based on the EIT-guided method can be used as a reference for intraoperative mechanical ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10562915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105629152023-10-11 Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia Shu, Bin Zhang, Yang Ren, Qian Zheng, Xuemei Zhang, Yamei Liu, Qi Li, Shiqi Chen, Jie Chen, Yuanjing Duan, Guangyou Huang, He Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of different titrated methods used to determine individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for intraoperative mechanical ventilation in female patients undergoing general anesthesia in different operative positions, and provide reference ranges of optimal PEEP values based on the titration. METHODS: A total of 123 female patients who underwent elective open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. After endotracheal intubation, patients' body position was adjusted to the supine position, Trendelenburg positions at 10° and 20° respectively. PEEP was titrated from 20 cmH(2)O to 4 cmH(2)O, decreasing by 2 cmH(2)O every 1 min. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT), hemodynamic and respiratory mechanics parameters were continuously monitored and recorded. Optimal PEEP values and reference ranges were respectively calculated based on optimal EIT parameters, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and lung dynamic compliance (Cdyn). RESULTS: EIT-guided optimal PEEP was found to have higher values than those of the MAP-guided and Cdyn-guided methods for all three body positions (P < 0.001), and it was observed to more significantly inhibit hemodynamics (P < 0.05). The variable coefficients of EIT-guided optimal PEEP values were smaller than those of the other two methods, and this technique could provide better ventilation uniformity for dorsal/ventral lung fields and better balance for pulmonary atelectasis/collapse. The 95% reference ranges of EIT-guided optimal PEEP values were 4.6–13.8 cmH(2)O, 7.0–15.0 cmH(2)O and 8.6–17.0 cmH(2)O for the supine position, Trendelenburg 10°, and Trendelenburg 20° positions, respectively. CONCLUSION: EIT-guided optimal PEEP titration was found to be a superior method for lung protective ventilation in different operative positions under general anesthesia. The calculated reference ranges of PEEP values based on the EIT-guided method can be used as a reference for intraoperative mechanical ventilation. Elsevier 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10562915/ /pubmed/37822628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20552 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Shu, Bin
Zhang, Yang
Ren, Qian
Zheng, Xuemei
Zhang, Yamei
Liu, Qi
Li, Shiqi
Chen, Jie
Chen, Yuanjing
Duan, Guangyou
Huang, He
Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia
title Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia
title_full Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia
title_fullStr Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia
title_short Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia
title_sort optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20552
work_keys_str_mv AT shubin optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia
AT zhangyang optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia
AT renqian optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia
AT zhengxuemei optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia
AT zhangyamei optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia
AT liuqi optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia
AT lishiqi optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia
AT chenjie optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia
AT chenyuanjing optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia
AT duanguangyou optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia
AT huanghe optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationofintraoperativemechanicalventilationindifferentoperativepositionsoffemalepatientsundergeneralanesthesia