Cargando…

Impact of ACEIs and ARBs-related adverse drug reaction on patients’ clinical outcomes: a cohort study in UK primary care

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reaction (ADR) related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may negatively affect patients’ treatment outcomes. AIM: To investigate the impact of ACEIs/ARBs-related ADR consultation on cardiovascular disease (CVD) event...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Insani, Widya N, Whittlesea, Cate, Ju, Chengsheng, Man, Kenneth KC, Adesuyan, Matthew, Chapman, Sarah, Wei, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37783509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0153
_version_ 1785118251737415680
author Insani, Widya N
Whittlesea, Cate
Ju, Chengsheng
Man, Kenneth KC
Adesuyan, Matthew
Chapman, Sarah
Wei, Li
author_facet Insani, Widya N
Whittlesea, Cate
Ju, Chengsheng
Man, Kenneth KC
Adesuyan, Matthew
Chapman, Sarah
Wei, Li
author_sort Insani, Widya N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reaction (ADR) related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may negatively affect patients’ treatment outcomes. AIM: To investigate the impact of ACEIs/ARBs-related ADR consultation on cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and all-cause mortality. DESIGN AND SETTING: Propensity score-matched cohort study of ACEIs/ARBs between 2004 and 2019 using UK IQVIA medical research data. METHOD: ADR consultations were identified using standardised designated codes. Propensity scores were calculated based on comorbidities, concomitant medications, frailty, and polypharmacy. Cox’s proportional hazard regression model was used to compare the outcomes between patients in ADR and non-ADR groups. In the secondary analysis, treatment- pattern changes following the ADR were examined and the subsequent outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Among 1 471 906 eligible users of ACEIs/ARBs, 13 652 (0.93%) patients had ACEIs/ARBs- related ADR consultation in primary care. Patients with ACEIs/ARBs-related ADR consultation had an increased risk of subsequent CVD events and all- cause mortality in both primary prevention (CVD events: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.43; all-cause mortality: aHR 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.27) and secondary prevention cohorts (CVD events: aHR 1.13, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.21; all-cause mortality: aHR 1.15, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.21). Half (50.19%) of patients with ADR continued to use ACEIs/ARBs, and these patients had a reduced risk of mortality (aHR 0.88, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.95) compared with those who discontinued using ACEIs/ARBs. CONCLUSION: This study provides information on the burden of ADR on patients and the health system. The findings call for additional monitoring and treatment strategies for patients affected by ADR to mitigate the risks of adverse clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10563001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105630012023-10-11 Impact of ACEIs and ARBs-related adverse drug reaction on patients’ clinical outcomes: a cohort study in UK primary care Insani, Widya N Whittlesea, Cate Ju, Chengsheng Man, Kenneth KC Adesuyan, Matthew Chapman, Sarah Wei, Li Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reaction (ADR) related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may negatively affect patients’ treatment outcomes. AIM: To investigate the impact of ACEIs/ARBs-related ADR consultation on cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and all-cause mortality. DESIGN AND SETTING: Propensity score-matched cohort study of ACEIs/ARBs between 2004 and 2019 using UK IQVIA medical research data. METHOD: ADR consultations were identified using standardised designated codes. Propensity scores were calculated based on comorbidities, concomitant medications, frailty, and polypharmacy. Cox’s proportional hazard regression model was used to compare the outcomes between patients in ADR and non-ADR groups. In the secondary analysis, treatment- pattern changes following the ADR were examined and the subsequent outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Among 1 471 906 eligible users of ACEIs/ARBs, 13 652 (0.93%) patients had ACEIs/ARBs- related ADR consultation in primary care. Patients with ACEIs/ARBs-related ADR consultation had an increased risk of subsequent CVD events and all- cause mortality in both primary prevention (CVD events: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.43; all-cause mortality: aHR 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.27) and secondary prevention cohorts (CVD events: aHR 1.13, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.21; all-cause mortality: aHR 1.15, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.21). Half (50.19%) of patients with ADR continued to use ACEIs/ARBs, and these patients had a reduced risk of mortality (aHR 0.88, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.95) compared with those who discontinued using ACEIs/ARBs. CONCLUSION: This study provides information on the burden of ADR on patients and the health system. The findings call for additional monitoring and treatment strategies for patients affected by ADR to mitigate the risks of adverse clinical outcomes. Royal College of General Practitioners 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10563001/ /pubmed/37783509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0153 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Insani, Widya N
Whittlesea, Cate
Ju, Chengsheng
Man, Kenneth KC
Adesuyan, Matthew
Chapman, Sarah
Wei, Li
Impact of ACEIs and ARBs-related adverse drug reaction on patients’ clinical outcomes: a cohort study in UK primary care
title Impact of ACEIs and ARBs-related adverse drug reaction on patients’ clinical outcomes: a cohort study in UK primary care
title_full Impact of ACEIs and ARBs-related adverse drug reaction on patients’ clinical outcomes: a cohort study in UK primary care
title_fullStr Impact of ACEIs and ARBs-related adverse drug reaction on patients’ clinical outcomes: a cohort study in UK primary care
title_full_unstemmed Impact of ACEIs and ARBs-related adverse drug reaction on patients’ clinical outcomes: a cohort study in UK primary care
title_short Impact of ACEIs and ARBs-related adverse drug reaction on patients’ clinical outcomes: a cohort study in UK primary care
title_sort impact of aceis and arbs-related adverse drug reaction on patients’ clinical outcomes: a cohort study in uk primary care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37783509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0153
work_keys_str_mv AT insaniwidyan impactofaceisandarbsrelatedadversedrugreactiononpatientsclinicaloutcomesacohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT whittleseacate impactofaceisandarbsrelatedadversedrugreactiononpatientsclinicaloutcomesacohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT juchengsheng impactofaceisandarbsrelatedadversedrugreactiononpatientsclinicaloutcomesacohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT mankennethkc impactofaceisandarbsrelatedadversedrugreactiononpatientsclinicaloutcomesacohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT adesuyanmatthew impactofaceisandarbsrelatedadversedrugreactiononpatientsclinicaloutcomesacohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT chapmansarah impactofaceisandarbsrelatedadversedrugreactiononpatientsclinicaloutcomesacohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT weili impactofaceisandarbsrelatedadversedrugreactiononpatientsclinicaloutcomesacohortstudyinukprimarycare