Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid

The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contains a functionally important fatty acid (FA) binding site, which is also found in some other coronaviruses, e.g. SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. The occupancy of the FA site by linoleic acid (LA) reduces infectivity by ‘locking’ the spike in a less infectious conformation. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, A Sofia F, Shoemark, Deborah K, Davidson, Andrew D, Berger, Imre, Schaffitzel, Christiane, Mulholland, Adrian J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36990513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjad021
_version_ 1785118277303795712
author Oliveira, A Sofia F
Shoemark, Deborah K
Davidson, Andrew D
Berger, Imre
Schaffitzel, Christiane
Mulholland, Adrian J
author_facet Oliveira, A Sofia F
Shoemark, Deborah K
Davidson, Andrew D
Berger, Imre
Schaffitzel, Christiane
Mulholland, Adrian J
author_sort Oliveira, A Sofia F
collection PubMed
description The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contains a functionally important fatty acid (FA) binding site, which is also found in some other coronaviruses, e.g. SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. The occupancy of the FA site by linoleic acid (LA) reduces infectivity by ‘locking’ the spike in a less infectious conformation. Here, we use dynamical-nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (D-NEMD) simulations to compare the allosteric responses of spike variants to LA removal. D-NEMD simulations show that the FA site is coupled to other functional regions of the protein, e.g. the receptor-binding motif (RBM), N-terminal domain (NTD), furin cleavage site, and regions surrounding the fusion peptide. D-NEMD simulations also identify the allosteric networks connecting the FA site to these functional regions. The comparison between the wild-type spike and four variants (Alpha, Delta, Delta plus, and Omicron BA.1) shows that the variants differ significantly in their responses to LA removal. The allosteric connections to the FA site on Alpha are generally similar to those on the wild-type protein, with the exception of the RBM and the S71–R78 region, which show a weaker link to the FA site. In contrast, Omicron is the most different variant, exhibiting significant differences in the RBM, NTD, V622–L629, and furin cleavage site. These differences in the allosteric modulation may be of functional relevance, potentially affecting transmissibility and virulence. Experimental comparison of the effects of LA on SARS-CoV-2 variants, including emerging variants, is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10563148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105631482023-10-11 SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid Oliveira, A Sofia F Shoemark, Deborah K Davidson, Andrew D Berger, Imre Schaffitzel, Christiane Mulholland, Adrian J J Mol Cell Biol Article The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contains a functionally important fatty acid (FA) binding site, which is also found in some other coronaviruses, e.g. SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. The occupancy of the FA site by linoleic acid (LA) reduces infectivity by ‘locking’ the spike in a less infectious conformation. Here, we use dynamical-nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (D-NEMD) simulations to compare the allosteric responses of spike variants to LA removal. D-NEMD simulations show that the FA site is coupled to other functional regions of the protein, e.g. the receptor-binding motif (RBM), N-terminal domain (NTD), furin cleavage site, and regions surrounding the fusion peptide. D-NEMD simulations also identify the allosteric networks connecting the FA site to these functional regions. The comparison between the wild-type spike and four variants (Alpha, Delta, Delta plus, and Omicron BA.1) shows that the variants differ significantly in their responses to LA removal. The allosteric connections to the FA site on Alpha are generally similar to those on the wild-type protein, with the exception of the RBM and the S71–R78 region, which show a weaker link to the FA site. In contrast, Omicron is the most different variant, exhibiting significant differences in the RBM, NTD, V622–L629, and furin cleavage site. These differences in the allosteric modulation may be of functional relevance, potentially affecting transmissibility and virulence. Experimental comparison of the effects of LA on SARS-CoV-2 variants, including emerging variants, is warranted. Oxford University Press 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10563148/ /pubmed/36990513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjad021 Text en © The Author(s) (2023). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, CEMCS, CAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Oliveira, A Sofia F
Shoemark, Deborah K
Davidson, Andrew D
Berger, Imre
Schaffitzel, Christiane
Mulholland, Adrian J
SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid
title SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid
title_full SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid
title_short SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid
title_sort sars-cov-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36990513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjad021
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveiraasofiaf sarscov2spikevariantsdifferintheirallostericresponsestolinoleicacid
AT shoemarkdeborahk sarscov2spikevariantsdifferintheirallostericresponsestolinoleicacid
AT davidsonandrewd sarscov2spikevariantsdifferintheirallostericresponsestolinoleicacid
AT bergerimre sarscov2spikevariantsdifferintheirallostericresponsestolinoleicacid
AT schaffitzelchristiane sarscov2spikevariantsdifferintheirallostericresponsestolinoleicacid
AT mulhollandadrianj sarscov2spikevariantsdifferintheirallostericresponsestolinoleicacid