Cargando…

Fotagliptin monotherapy with alogliptin as an active comparator in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have become firmly established in treatment algorithms and national guidelines for improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).To report the findings from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Mingtong, Sun, Kan, Xu, Wenjie, Wang, Chuan, Yan, Dewen, Li, Shu, Cong, Li, Pi, Yinzhen, Song, Weihong, Sun, Qingyuan, Xiao, Rijun, Peng, Weixia, Wang, Jianping, Peng, Hui, Zhang, Yawei, Duan, Peng, Zhang, Meiying, Liu, Jianying, Huang, Qingmei, Li, Xuefeng, Bao, Yan, Zeng, Tianshu, Wang, Kun, Qin, Li, Wu, Chaoming, Deng, Chunying, Huang, Chenghu, Yan, Shuang, Zhang, Wei, Li, Meizi, Sun, Li, Wang, Yanjun, Li, HongMei, Wang, Guang, Pang, Shuguang, Zheng, Xianling, Wang, Haifang, Wang, Fujun, Su, Xiuhai, Ma, Yujin, Li, Ziling, Xie, Zuoling, Xu, Ning, Ni, Lin, Zhang, Li, Deng, Xiangqun, Pan, Tianrong, Dong, Qijuan, Wu, Xiaohong, Shen, Xingping, Zhang, Xin, Zou, Qijing, Jiang, Chengxia, Xi, Jue, Ma, Jianhua, Sun, Jingchao, Yan, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03089-x
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have become firmly established in treatment algorithms and national guidelines for improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).To report the findings from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, which was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel DPP-4 inhibitor fotagliptin in treatment-naive patients with T2DM. METHODS: Patients with T2DM were randomized to receive fotagliptin (n = 230), alogliptin (n = 113) or placebo (n = 115) at a 2:1:1 ratio for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period, followed by an open-label treatment period, making up a total of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was to determine the superiority of fotagliptin over placebo in the change of HbA1c from baseline to Week 24. All serious or significant adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, mean decreases in HbA1c from baseline were -0.70% for fotagliptin, -0.72% for alogliptin and -0.26% for placebo. Estimated mean treatment differences in HbA1c were -0.44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.62% to -0.27%) for fotagliptin versus placebo, and -0.46% (95% CI: -0.67% to -0.26%) for alogliptin versus placebo, and 0.02% (95%CI: -0.16% to 0.19%; upper limit of 95%CI < margin of 0.4%) for fotagliptin versus alogliptin. So fotagliptin was non-inferior to alogliptin. Compared with subjects with placebo (15.5%), significantly more patients with fotagliptin (37.0%) and alogliptin (35.5%) achieved HbA1c < 7.0% after 24 weeks of treatment. During the whole 52 weeks of treatment, the overall incidence of hypoglycemia was low for both of the fotagliptin and alogliptin groups (1.0% each). No drug-related serious adverse events were observed in any treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the study demonstrated improvement in glycemic control and a favorable safety profile for fotagliptin in treatment-naive patients with T2DM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrail.gov NCT05782192. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-023-03089-x.