Cargando…
European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention – part 3: topiramate
OBJECTIVE: Topiramate is a repurposed first-line treatment for migraine prophylaxis. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to critically re-appraise the existing evidence supporting the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate. METHODS: A systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochran...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01671-5 |
_version_ | 1785118319262564352 |
---|---|
author | Raffaelli, Bianca García-Azorín, David Boucherie, Deirdre M. Amin, Faisal Mohammad Deligianni, Christina I. Gil-Gouveia, Raquel Kirsh, Sarah Lampl, Christian Sacco, Simona Uluduz, Derya Versijpt, Jan MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Zeraatkar, Dena Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita Reuter, Uwe |
author_facet | Raffaelli, Bianca García-Azorín, David Boucherie, Deirdre M. Amin, Faisal Mohammad Deligianni, Christina I. Gil-Gouveia, Raquel Kirsh, Sarah Lampl, Christian Sacco, Simona Uluduz, Derya Versijpt, Jan MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Zeraatkar, Dena Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita Reuter, Uwe |
author_sort | Raffaelli, Bianca |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Topiramate is a repurposed first-line treatment for migraine prophylaxis. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to critically re-appraise the existing evidence supporting the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate. METHODS: A systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for trials of pharmacological treatment in migraine prophylaxis as of August 13, 2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Randomized controlled trials in adult patients that used topiramate for the prophylactic treatment of migraine, with placebo as active comparator, were included. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved studies and extracted all data. Outcomes of interest were the 50% responder rates, the reduction in monthly migraine days, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. Results were pooled and meta-analyzed, with sensitivity analysis based on the risk of bias of the studies, the monthly migraine days at baseline, and the previous use of other prophylactic treatments. Certainty evidence was judged according to the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Eight out of 10,826 studies fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria, accounting for 2,610 randomized patients. Six studies included patients with episodic migraine and two with chronic migraine. Topiramate dose ranged from 50 to 200 mg/day, and all studies included a placebo arm. There was a high certainty that topiramate: 1) increased the proportion of patients who achieved a 50% responder rate in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo [relative risk: 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29–2.01); absolute risk difference: 168 more per 1,000 (95% CI: 80 to 278 more)]; 2) was associated with 0.99 (95% CI: 1.41–0.58) fewer migraine days than placebo; 3) and had a higher proportion of patients with adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation [absolute risk difference 80 patients more per 1,000 (95% CI: 20 to 140 more patients)]. CONCLUSIONS: There is high-quality evidence of the efficacy of topiramate in the prophylaxis of migraine, albeit its use poses a risk of adverse events that may lead to treatment discontinuation, with a negative effect on patient satisfaction and adherence to care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01671-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10563338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105633382023-10-11 European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention – part 3: topiramate Raffaelli, Bianca García-Azorín, David Boucherie, Deirdre M. Amin, Faisal Mohammad Deligianni, Christina I. Gil-Gouveia, Raquel Kirsh, Sarah Lampl, Christian Sacco, Simona Uluduz, Derya Versijpt, Jan MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Zeraatkar, Dena Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita Reuter, Uwe J Headache Pain Review OBJECTIVE: Topiramate is a repurposed first-line treatment for migraine prophylaxis. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to critically re-appraise the existing evidence supporting the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate. METHODS: A systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for trials of pharmacological treatment in migraine prophylaxis as of August 13, 2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Randomized controlled trials in adult patients that used topiramate for the prophylactic treatment of migraine, with placebo as active comparator, were included. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved studies and extracted all data. Outcomes of interest were the 50% responder rates, the reduction in monthly migraine days, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. Results were pooled and meta-analyzed, with sensitivity analysis based on the risk of bias of the studies, the monthly migraine days at baseline, and the previous use of other prophylactic treatments. Certainty evidence was judged according to the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Eight out of 10,826 studies fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria, accounting for 2,610 randomized patients. Six studies included patients with episodic migraine and two with chronic migraine. Topiramate dose ranged from 50 to 200 mg/day, and all studies included a placebo arm. There was a high certainty that topiramate: 1) increased the proportion of patients who achieved a 50% responder rate in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo [relative risk: 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29–2.01); absolute risk difference: 168 more per 1,000 (95% CI: 80 to 278 more)]; 2) was associated with 0.99 (95% CI: 1.41–0.58) fewer migraine days than placebo; 3) and had a higher proportion of patients with adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation [absolute risk difference 80 patients more per 1,000 (95% CI: 20 to 140 more patients)]. CONCLUSIONS: There is high-quality evidence of the efficacy of topiramate in the prophylaxis of migraine, albeit its use poses a risk of adverse events that may lead to treatment discontinuation, with a negative effect on patient satisfaction and adherence to care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01671-5. Springer Milan 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10563338/ /pubmed/37814223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01671-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Raffaelli, Bianca García-Azorín, David Boucherie, Deirdre M. Amin, Faisal Mohammad Deligianni, Christina I. Gil-Gouveia, Raquel Kirsh, Sarah Lampl, Christian Sacco, Simona Uluduz, Derya Versijpt, Jan MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Zeraatkar, Dena Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita Reuter, Uwe European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention – part 3: topiramate |
title | European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention – part 3: topiramate |
title_full | European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention – part 3: topiramate |
title_fullStr | European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention – part 3: topiramate |
title_full_unstemmed | European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention – part 3: topiramate |
title_short | European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention – part 3: topiramate |
title_sort | european headache federation (ehf) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention – part 3: topiramate |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01671-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raffaellibianca europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT garciaazorindavid europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT boucheriedeirdrem europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT aminfaisalmohammad europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT deligiannichristinai europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT gilgouveiaraquel europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT kirshsarah europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT lamplchristian europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT saccosimona europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT uluduzderya europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT versijptjan europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT maassenvandenbrinkantoinette europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT zeraatkardena europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT sanchezdelriomargarita europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate AT reuteruwe europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart3topiramate |