Cargando…

The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia

Background The choice of anesthesia for an elective cesarean section should be based on an individual benefit-risk assessment, considering the pregnant woman’s preferences, concerns, and the available medical expertise. This study aimed to determine the preferences for general and spinal anesthesia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tawfeeq, Nasser A, Hilal, Faisal, Alharbi, Noof M, Alowid, Fay, Almaghrabi, Rana Y, Alsubhi, Rahaf, Alharbi, Shahd F, Fallatah, Amal, Aloufi, Leenah M, Alsaleh, Noor A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822429
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44972
_version_ 1785118326793437184
author Tawfeeq, Nasser A
Hilal, Faisal
Alharbi, Noof M
Alowid, Fay
Almaghrabi, Rana Y
Alsubhi, Rahaf
Alharbi, Shahd F
Fallatah, Amal
Aloufi, Leenah M
Alsaleh, Noor A
author_facet Tawfeeq, Nasser A
Hilal, Faisal
Alharbi, Noof M
Alowid, Fay
Almaghrabi, Rana Y
Alsubhi, Rahaf
Alharbi, Shahd F
Fallatah, Amal
Aloufi, Leenah M
Alsaleh, Noor A
author_sort Tawfeeq, Nasser A
collection PubMed
description Background The choice of anesthesia for an elective cesarean section should be based on an individual benefit-risk assessment, considering the pregnant woman’s preferences, concerns, and the available medical expertise. This study aimed to determine the preferences for general and spinal anesthesia among women undergoing elective cesarean sections and the factors affecting their choice. Methods The study design is a cross-sectional study, and it was conducted on pregnant women to measure the acceptance of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in patients with elective cesarean sections in Saudi Arabia. Random pregnant women were invited to participate in this study across Saudi Arabia after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A digital questionnaire was distributed across Saudi Arabia to be filled out by female residents. A Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA) sheet was used for data entry, while IBM SPSS software version 27.0.1 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Results The study included 813 participants; most (28%) of them were 25-30 years old. Of the study participants, 54% had chosen spinal anesthesia before, 22% had chosen general anesthesia, and 24% had chosen neither. Reasons to choose general anesthesia were reported as follows: 21.6% feared pain during surgery, 24.2% feared watching the surgical procedures on their bodies, 16.6% feared back pain, 12.8% feared being paralyzed, and 15.1% feared needles used to administer anesthesia in the lower back. Reasons for choosing spinal anesthesia were reported as follows: 26.3% had back pain concerns; 13% feared prolonged unconsciousness; 9.6% feared having a headache after surgery; 17% had post-surgery pain concerns; 30.1% wanted to be alert at the time of the birth of the baby; 10.6% feared the chances of experiencing nausea and vomiting; and 7.4% feared not being able to breastfeed. Conclusion Spinal anesthesia was chosen by more participants than general anesthesia. There was a statistically significant association between choosing spinal anesthesia and the number of previous pregnancies, parity, history of preterm labor, and recommendation to undergo general or spinal anesthesia by non-medical staff. It was also significant with the older age and higher educational level of participants. This decision may be influenced by a number of variables, the most significant of which are prior experience with general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia, educational attainment, and non-medical advice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10563372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105633722023-10-11 The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia Tawfeeq, Nasser A Hilal, Faisal Alharbi, Noof M Alowid, Fay Almaghrabi, Rana Y Alsubhi, Rahaf Alharbi, Shahd F Fallatah, Amal Aloufi, Leenah M Alsaleh, Noor A Cureus Anesthesiology Background The choice of anesthesia for an elective cesarean section should be based on an individual benefit-risk assessment, considering the pregnant woman’s preferences, concerns, and the available medical expertise. This study aimed to determine the preferences for general and spinal anesthesia among women undergoing elective cesarean sections and the factors affecting their choice. Methods The study design is a cross-sectional study, and it was conducted on pregnant women to measure the acceptance of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in patients with elective cesarean sections in Saudi Arabia. Random pregnant women were invited to participate in this study across Saudi Arabia after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A digital questionnaire was distributed across Saudi Arabia to be filled out by female residents. A Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA) sheet was used for data entry, while IBM SPSS software version 27.0.1 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Results The study included 813 participants; most (28%) of them were 25-30 years old. Of the study participants, 54% had chosen spinal anesthesia before, 22% had chosen general anesthesia, and 24% had chosen neither. Reasons to choose general anesthesia were reported as follows: 21.6% feared pain during surgery, 24.2% feared watching the surgical procedures on their bodies, 16.6% feared back pain, 12.8% feared being paralyzed, and 15.1% feared needles used to administer anesthesia in the lower back. Reasons for choosing spinal anesthesia were reported as follows: 26.3% had back pain concerns; 13% feared prolonged unconsciousness; 9.6% feared having a headache after surgery; 17% had post-surgery pain concerns; 30.1% wanted to be alert at the time of the birth of the baby; 10.6% feared the chances of experiencing nausea and vomiting; and 7.4% feared not being able to breastfeed. Conclusion Spinal anesthesia was chosen by more participants than general anesthesia. There was a statistically significant association between choosing spinal anesthesia and the number of previous pregnancies, parity, history of preterm labor, and recommendation to undergo general or spinal anesthesia by non-medical staff. It was also significant with the older age and higher educational level of participants. This decision may be influenced by a number of variables, the most significant of which are prior experience with general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia, educational attainment, and non-medical advice. Cureus 2023-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10563372/ /pubmed/37822429 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44972 Text en Copyright © 2023, Tawfeeq et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Tawfeeq, Nasser A
Hilal, Faisal
Alharbi, Noof M
Alowid, Fay
Almaghrabi, Rana Y
Alsubhi, Rahaf
Alharbi, Shahd F
Fallatah, Amal
Aloufi, Leenah M
Alsaleh, Noor A
The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia
title The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia
title_full The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia
title_short The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia
title_sort prevalence of acceptance between general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia among pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean sections in saudi arabia
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822429
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44972
work_keys_str_mv AT tawfeeqnassera theprevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT hilalfaisal theprevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT alharbinoofm theprevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT alowidfay theprevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT almaghrabiranay theprevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT alsubhirahaf theprevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT alharbishahdf theprevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT fallatahamal theprevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT aloufileenahm theprevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT alsalehnoora theprevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT tawfeeqnassera prevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT hilalfaisal prevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT alharbinoofm prevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT alowidfay prevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT almaghrabiranay prevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT alsubhirahaf prevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT alharbishahdf prevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT fallatahamal prevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT aloufileenahm prevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia
AT alsalehnoora prevalenceofacceptancebetweengeneralanesthesiaandspinalanesthesiaamongpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecaesareansectionsinsaudiarabia