Cargando…

Validating the caregiver self‐efficacy in contribution to self‐care scale Thai version for stroke: A psychometric evaluation

AIM: To test the validity and reliability of the Caregiver Self‐Efficacy in Contribution to Self‐Care Scale Thai Version (CC‐Self Efficacy Scale (Thai)) for Stroke. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional study was undertaken from September to December 2022. METHODS: Four hundred thirty‐four caregivers of people...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suwanno, Jom, Klinjun, Nuntaporn, Srisomthrong, Kannika, Kelly, Matthew, Mayeng, Marzukee, Suwanno, Juk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37641546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1990
_version_ 1785118334263492608
author Suwanno, Jom
Klinjun, Nuntaporn
Srisomthrong, Kannika
Kelly, Matthew
Mayeng, Marzukee
Suwanno, Juk
author_facet Suwanno, Jom
Klinjun, Nuntaporn
Srisomthrong, Kannika
Kelly, Matthew
Mayeng, Marzukee
Suwanno, Juk
author_sort Suwanno, Jom
collection PubMed
description AIM: To test the validity and reliability of the Caregiver Self‐Efficacy in Contribution to Self‐Care Scale Thai Version (CC‐Self Efficacy Scale (Thai)) for Stroke. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional study was undertaken from September to December 2022. METHODS: Four hundred thirty‐four caregivers of people with stroke were selected from the registry of stroke patients in primary care units or hospitals following inclusion criteria. The research assistants collected information when the caregiver took a patient for a doctor's appointment or visited the patient's and caregiver's home. RESULTS: The 434 caregivers had a mean age of 48 years, female 77.67%, 51.97% child or grandchild of patients, and 72.85% living with the patient. Ten items of the CC‐Self Efficacy Scale (Thai) were normally distributed and appropriate for exploratory factor analysis (EFA). EFA suggested three‐factor model. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the three‐factor model was an unfit model, with the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.09. We regrouped items based on content to create six‐factor model. CFA supported the six‐factor model of CC‐Self Efficacy Scale (Thai) questionnaire with the reliability judged by McDonald's omega being 0.87. The 434 sample size was enough for EFA and CFA. The CC‐Self Efficacy Scale (Thai) with the six‐factor model is appropriate for evaluating the caregiver confidence of people with stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10563412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105634122023-10-11 Validating the caregiver self‐efficacy in contribution to self‐care scale Thai version for stroke: A psychometric evaluation Suwanno, Jom Klinjun, Nuntaporn Srisomthrong, Kannika Kelly, Matthew Mayeng, Marzukee Suwanno, Juk Nurs Open Research Methodology: Discussion Paper ‐ Methodology AIM: To test the validity and reliability of the Caregiver Self‐Efficacy in Contribution to Self‐Care Scale Thai Version (CC‐Self Efficacy Scale (Thai)) for Stroke. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional study was undertaken from September to December 2022. METHODS: Four hundred thirty‐four caregivers of people with stroke were selected from the registry of stroke patients in primary care units or hospitals following inclusion criteria. The research assistants collected information when the caregiver took a patient for a doctor's appointment or visited the patient's and caregiver's home. RESULTS: The 434 caregivers had a mean age of 48 years, female 77.67%, 51.97% child or grandchild of patients, and 72.85% living with the patient. Ten items of the CC‐Self Efficacy Scale (Thai) were normally distributed and appropriate for exploratory factor analysis (EFA). EFA suggested three‐factor model. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the three‐factor model was an unfit model, with the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.09. We regrouped items based on content to create six‐factor model. CFA supported the six‐factor model of CC‐Self Efficacy Scale (Thai) questionnaire with the reliability judged by McDonald's omega being 0.87. The 434 sample size was enough for EFA and CFA. The CC‐Self Efficacy Scale (Thai) with the six‐factor model is appropriate for evaluating the caregiver confidence of people with stroke. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10563412/ /pubmed/37641546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1990 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Methodology: Discussion Paper ‐ Methodology
Suwanno, Jom
Klinjun, Nuntaporn
Srisomthrong, Kannika
Kelly, Matthew
Mayeng, Marzukee
Suwanno, Juk
Validating the caregiver self‐efficacy in contribution to self‐care scale Thai version for stroke: A psychometric evaluation
title Validating the caregiver self‐efficacy in contribution to self‐care scale Thai version for stroke: A psychometric evaluation
title_full Validating the caregiver self‐efficacy in contribution to self‐care scale Thai version for stroke: A psychometric evaluation
title_fullStr Validating the caregiver self‐efficacy in contribution to self‐care scale Thai version for stroke: A psychometric evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Validating the caregiver self‐efficacy in contribution to self‐care scale Thai version for stroke: A psychometric evaluation
title_short Validating the caregiver self‐efficacy in contribution to self‐care scale Thai version for stroke: A psychometric evaluation
title_sort validating the caregiver self‐efficacy in contribution to self‐care scale thai version for stroke: a psychometric evaluation
topic Research Methodology: Discussion Paper ‐ Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37641546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1990
work_keys_str_mv AT suwannojom validatingthecaregiverselfefficacyincontributiontoselfcarescalethaiversionforstrokeapsychometricevaluation
AT klinjunnuntaporn validatingthecaregiverselfefficacyincontributiontoselfcarescalethaiversionforstrokeapsychometricevaluation
AT srisomthrongkannika validatingthecaregiverselfefficacyincontributiontoselfcarescalethaiversionforstrokeapsychometricevaluation
AT kellymatthew validatingthecaregiverselfefficacyincontributiontoselfcarescalethaiversionforstrokeapsychometricevaluation
AT mayengmarzukee validatingthecaregiverselfefficacyincontributiontoselfcarescalethaiversionforstrokeapsychometricevaluation
AT suwannojuk validatingthecaregiverselfefficacyincontributiontoselfcarescalethaiversionforstrokeapsychometricevaluation