Cargando…

Developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing

AIM: The present study aimed to develop an ethical behaviour rubric for nurses and evaluate its reliability and validity. METHOD: This study was to designed to construct a rubric and evaluate the reliability and validity. The ethical behaviour rubric was distributed to 241 nurses and 154 were comple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsujio, Yuriko, Yasuda, Mio, Hattori, Mikage, Yoshioka, Tomoko, Nakamura, Naomi, Nakata, Mitsuko, Teramukai, Satoshi, Minemura, Yuichi, Azuma, Tomomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1992
_version_ 1785118338054094848
author Tsujio, Yuriko
Yasuda, Mio
Hattori, Mikage
Yoshioka, Tomoko
Nakamura, Naomi
Nakata, Mitsuko
Teramukai, Satoshi
Minemura, Yuichi
Azuma, Tomomi
author_facet Tsujio, Yuriko
Yasuda, Mio
Hattori, Mikage
Yoshioka, Tomoko
Nakamura, Naomi
Nakata, Mitsuko
Teramukai, Satoshi
Minemura, Yuichi
Azuma, Tomomi
author_sort Tsujio, Yuriko
collection PubMed
description AIM: The present study aimed to develop an ethical behaviour rubric for nurses and evaluate its reliability and validity. METHOD: This study was to designed to construct a rubric and evaluate the reliability and validity. The ethical behaviour rubric was distributed to 241 nurses and 154 were completed and returned. The intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for all 10 items on the ethical behaviour rubric, and the internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α. Construct validity was tested with explanatory factor analysis, and criterion validity was tested using the known‐groups method. RESULTS: Intra‐rater reliability had a high interrater agreement (ICC = 0.9), and inter‐rater reliability had a high interrater agreement (ICC = 0.84). The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.96. There was a linear correlation between the number of years of nursing experience and rubric scores p < 0.001. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 10 items loading on four factors. The result of factor analysis is that Cronbach's α was 0.93 for the first factor, 0.83 for the second factor, 0.91 for the third factor, and 0.77 for the fourth factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our rubric was found to be a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of ethical behaviour among nurses in Japan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10563428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105634282023-10-11 Developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing Tsujio, Yuriko Yasuda, Mio Hattori, Mikage Yoshioka, Tomoko Nakamura, Naomi Nakata, Mitsuko Teramukai, Satoshi Minemura, Yuichi Azuma, Tomomi Nurs Open Empirical Research Quantitative AIM: The present study aimed to develop an ethical behaviour rubric for nurses and evaluate its reliability and validity. METHOD: This study was to designed to construct a rubric and evaluate the reliability and validity. The ethical behaviour rubric was distributed to 241 nurses and 154 were completed and returned. The intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for all 10 items on the ethical behaviour rubric, and the internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α. Construct validity was tested with explanatory factor analysis, and criterion validity was tested using the known‐groups method. RESULTS: Intra‐rater reliability had a high interrater agreement (ICC = 0.9), and inter‐rater reliability had a high interrater agreement (ICC = 0.84). The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.96. There was a linear correlation between the number of years of nursing experience and rubric scores p < 0.001. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 10 items loading on four factors. The result of factor analysis is that Cronbach's α was 0.93 for the first factor, 0.83 for the second factor, 0.91 for the third factor, and 0.77 for the fourth factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our rubric was found to be a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of ethical behaviour among nurses in Japan. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10563428/ /pubmed/37694450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1992 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Empirical Research Quantitative
Tsujio, Yuriko
Yasuda, Mio
Hattori, Mikage
Yoshioka, Tomoko
Nakamura, Naomi
Nakata, Mitsuko
Teramukai, Satoshi
Minemura, Yuichi
Azuma, Tomomi
Developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing
title Developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing
title_full Developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing
title_fullStr Developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing
title_full_unstemmed Developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing
title_short Developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing
title_sort developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing
topic Empirical Research Quantitative
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1992
work_keys_str_mv AT tsujioyuriko developingabehaviourrubricforthepracticalmodelofethicalbehaviourforclinicalnursing
AT yasudamio developingabehaviourrubricforthepracticalmodelofethicalbehaviourforclinicalnursing
AT hattorimikage developingabehaviourrubricforthepracticalmodelofethicalbehaviourforclinicalnursing
AT yoshiokatomoko developingabehaviourrubricforthepracticalmodelofethicalbehaviourforclinicalnursing
AT nakamuranaomi developingabehaviourrubricforthepracticalmodelofethicalbehaviourforclinicalnursing
AT nakatamitsuko developingabehaviourrubricforthepracticalmodelofethicalbehaviourforclinicalnursing
AT teramukaisatoshi developingabehaviourrubricforthepracticalmodelofethicalbehaviourforclinicalnursing
AT minemurayuichi developingabehaviourrubricforthepracticalmodelofethicalbehaviourforclinicalnursing
AT azumatomomi developingabehaviourrubricforthepracticalmodelofethicalbehaviourforclinicalnursing