Cargando…
Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study
OBJECTIVES: As medical schools worldwide condense the preclinical phase of medical education, it is increasingly important to identify resources that help medical students retain and employ the medical information. One popular tool among medical students is an application called Anki, a free and ope...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205231205389 |
_version_ | 1785118349297975296 |
---|---|
author | Levy, Joshua Ely, Kencie Lagasca, Gemma Kausar, Hiba Patel, Deepal Andersen, Shaun Georges, Carlos Simanton, Edward |
author_facet | Levy, Joshua Ely, Kencie Lagasca, Gemma Kausar, Hiba Patel, Deepal Andersen, Shaun Georges, Carlos Simanton, Edward |
author_sort | Levy, Joshua |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: As medical schools worldwide condense the preclinical phase of medical education, it is increasingly important to identify resources that help medical students retain and employ the medical information. One popular tool among medical students is an application called Anki, a free and open-source flashcard program utilizing spaced repetition for quick and durable memorization. The purpose of this study is to determine how variable Anki usage among first-year medical students throughout a standardized anatomy and physiology course correlates with performance. METHODS: We designed a novel Anki add-on called “Anki Stat Scraper” to collect data on first-year medical students at Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine during their 8-week anatomy and physiology course. Anki users (N = 45) were separated into four groups: Heavy (N = 5), intermediate (N = 5), light (N = 16), and limited-Anki (N = 19) users, based on the time each student spent on the flashcard app, how many flashcards they studied per day, and how many days they used the app prior to their anatomy and physiology exam. A 14-question Likert scale questionnaire was administered to each participant to gauge their understanding of Anki and how they used the app to study. RESULTS: Heavy and intermediate Anki users had higher average exam scores than their counterparts who did not use Anki as a study method. Average exam scores were 90.34%, 91.74%, 85.86%, and 87.75% for heavy, intermediate, light, and limited-Anki users respectively (p > 0.05). Our survey demonstrated that Anki users spent an average of 73.86% of their study time using Anki, compared to an average of 36.53% for limited-Anki users (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anki users did not score significantly higher compared to limited-Anki users. However, survey responses from students believe that Anki may still be a useful educational tool for future medical students. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10563486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105634862023-10-11 Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study Levy, Joshua Ely, Kencie Lagasca, Gemma Kausar, Hiba Patel, Deepal Andersen, Shaun Georges, Carlos Simanton, Edward J Med Educ Curric Dev Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: As medical schools worldwide condense the preclinical phase of medical education, it is increasingly important to identify resources that help medical students retain and employ the medical information. One popular tool among medical students is an application called Anki, a free and open-source flashcard program utilizing spaced repetition for quick and durable memorization. The purpose of this study is to determine how variable Anki usage among first-year medical students throughout a standardized anatomy and physiology course correlates with performance. METHODS: We designed a novel Anki add-on called “Anki Stat Scraper” to collect data on first-year medical students at Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine during their 8-week anatomy and physiology course. Anki users (N = 45) were separated into four groups: Heavy (N = 5), intermediate (N = 5), light (N = 16), and limited-Anki (N = 19) users, based on the time each student spent on the flashcard app, how many flashcards they studied per day, and how many days they used the app prior to their anatomy and physiology exam. A 14-question Likert scale questionnaire was administered to each participant to gauge their understanding of Anki and how they used the app to study. RESULTS: Heavy and intermediate Anki users had higher average exam scores than their counterparts who did not use Anki as a study method. Average exam scores were 90.34%, 91.74%, 85.86%, and 87.75% for heavy, intermediate, light, and limited-Anki users respectively (p > 0.05). Our survey demonstrated that Anki users spent an average of 73.86% of their study time using Anki, compared to an average of 36.53% for limited-Anki users (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anki users did not score significantly higher compared to limited-Anki users. However, survey responses from students believe that Anki may still be a useful educational tool for future medical students. SAGE Publications 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10563486/ /pubmed/37822777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205231205389 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Levy, Joshua Ely, Kencie Lagasca, Gemma Kausar, Hiba Patel, Deepal Andersen, Shaun Georges, Carlos Simanton, Edward Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study |
title | Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study |
title_full | Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study |
title_short | Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | exploring anki usage among first-year medical students during an anatomy & physiology course: a pilot study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205231205389 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levyjoshua exploringankiusageamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsduringananatomyphysiologycourseapilotstudy AT elykencie exploringankiusageamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsduringananatomyphysiologycourseapilotstudy AT lagascagemma exploringankiusageamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsduringananatomyphysiologycourseapilotstudy AT kausarhiba exploringankiusageamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsduringananatomyphysiologycourseapilotstudy AT pateldeepal exploringankiusageamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsduringananatomyphysiologycourseapilotstudy AT andersenshaun exploringankiusageamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsduringananatomyphysiologycourseapilotstudy AT georgescarlos exploringankiusageamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsduringananatomyphysiologycourseapilotstudy AT simantonedward exploringankiusageamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsduringananatomyphysiologycourseapilotstudy |