Cargando…
Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The development of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has advanced rapidly in the medical field, notably in trauma medicine. We aimed to systematically appraise the efficacy of AI, ML and DL models for predicting outcomes in trauma triage compared...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231205736 |
_version_ | 1785118352840065024 |
---|---|
author | Adebayo, Oluwasemilore Bhuiyan, Zunira Areeba Ahmed, Zubair |
author_facet | Adebayo, Oluwasemilore Bhuiyan, Zunira Areeba Ahmed, Zubair |
author_sort | Adebayo, Oluwasemilore |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The development of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has advanced rapidly in the medical field, notably in trauma medicine. We aimed to systematically appraise the efficacy of AI, ML and DL models for predicting outcomes in trauma triage compared to conventional triage tools. METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Embase and reference lists for studies published from 1 January 2010 to 9 June 2022. We included studies which analysed the use of AI, ML and DL models for trauma triage in human subjects. Reviews and AI/ML/DL models used for other purposes such as teaching, or diagnosis were excluded. Data was extracted on AI/ML/DL model type, comparison tools, primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. We performed meta-analysis on studies reporting our main outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and critical care admission. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen studies were identified in our search, of which 14 studies were included in the systematic review and 10 were included in the meta-analysis. All studies performed external validation. The best-performing AI/ML/DL models outperformed conventional trauma triage tools for all outcomes in all studies except two. For mortality, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) score difference between AI/ML/DL models and conventional trauma triage was 0.09, 95% CI (0.02, 0.15), favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.008). The mean AUROC score difference for hospitalisation was 0.11, 95% CI (0.10, 0.13), favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.0001). For critical care admission, the mean AUROC score difference was 0.09, 95% CI (0.08, 0.10) favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that the predictive ability of AI/ML/DL models is significantly better than conventional trauma triage tools for outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and critical care admission. However, further research and in particular randomised controlled trials are required to evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of using AI/ML/DL models in trauma medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10563501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105635012023-10-11 Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis Adebayo, Oluwasemilore Bhuiyan, Zunira Areeba Ahmed, Zubair Digit Health Review Article BACKGROUND: The development of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has advanced rapidly in the medical field, notably in trauma medicine. We aimed to systematically appraise the efficacy of AI, ML and DL models for predicting outcomes in trauma triage compared to conventional triage tools. METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Embase and reference lists for studies published from 1 January 2010 to 9 June 2022. We included studies which analysed the use of AI, ML and DL models for trauma triage in human subjects. Reviews and AI/ML/DL models used for other purposes such as teaching, or diagnosis were excluded. Data was extracted on AI/ML/DL model type, comparison tools, primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. We performed meta-analysis on studies reporting our main outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and critical care admission. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen studies were identified in our search, of which 14 studies were included in the systematic review and 10 were included in the meta-analysis. All studies performed external validation. The best-performing AI/ML/DL models outperformed conventional trauma triage tools for all outcomes in all studies except two. For mortality, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) score difference between AI/ML/DL models and conventional trauma triage was 0.09, 95% CI (0.02, 0.15), favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.008). The mean AUROC score difference for hospitalisation was 0.11, 95% CI (0.10, 0.13), favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.0001). For critical care admission, the mean AUROC score difference was 0.09, 95% CI (0.08, 0.10) favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that the predictive ability of AI/ML/DL models is significantly better than conventional trauma triage tools for outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and critical care admission. However, further research and in particular randomised controlled trials are required to evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of using AI/ML/DL models in trauma medicine. SAGE Publications 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10563501/ /pubmed/37822960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231205736 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Adebayo, Oluwasemilore Bhuiyan, Zunira Areeba Ahmed, Zubair Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep
learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep
learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep
learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep
learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep
learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep
learning in trauma triage: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231205736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adebayooluwasemilore exploringtheeffectivenessofartificialintelligencemachinelearninganddeeplearningintraumatriageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bhuiyanzuniraareeba exploringtheeffectivenessofartificialintelligencemachinelearninganddeeplearningintraumatriageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ahmedzubair exploringtheeffectivenessofartificialintelligencemachinelearninganddeeplearningintraumatriageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |