Cargando…

Fluoride release by restorative materials after applying surface coating agents

The prompt use of an enamel surface covering reagent is advised to safeguard the dental restorative substance from mishaps. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the fluoride emitting capabilities of standard GIC, and Zirconomer cement together with surface coverings and without surface coverings....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parashar, Anamika, Sharma, Yogesh Kumar, Kumar, Sumit, M, Kavitha, Ghosh Saha, Pallabi, Patel, Pragya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Biomedical Informatics 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822825
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019423
_version_ 1785118357860646912
author Parashar, Anamika
Sharma, Yogesh Kumar
Kumar, Sumit
M, Kavitha
Ghosh Saha, Pallabi
Patel, Pragya
author_facet Parashar, Anamika
Sharma, Yogesh Kumar
Kumar, Sumit
M, Kavitha
Ghosh Saha, Pallabi
Patel, Pragya
author_sort Parashar, Anamika
collection PubMed
description The prompt use of an enamel surface covering reagent is advised to safeguard the dental restorative substance from mishaps. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the fluoride emitting capabilities of standard GIC, and Zirconomer cement together with surface coverings and without surface coverings. The conventional GIC cement was part of experimental category A while Zirconomer cement was part of category B. For every experimental categories, a set of sixty brass mould prototypes in the form of disc with dimensions: diameter (6±0.1mm) and thickness (2±0.1 mm) were created and subsequently covered with Teflon strip in accordance with the package recommendations. Also, for both experimental categories, such pellets were randomly allocated to three sub-categories of 20 each. For one category petroleum jelly was administered with a cotton bud and then delicately dried under airflow (A3 subcategory and B3 subcategory); for another sub-category G-Coat was laced through a micro-tip dispenser and light treated for twenty seconds (A2 subcategory and B2 subcategory); the rest 20 specimens were left without any coating (A1 subcategory and B1 subcategory). It was observed that in subcategory A1 and A3 there was continuous decline in emission of fluoride ion as the days progressed. However there was an increase in emission of fluoride in A2 subcategory on moving to day 5 from day 1. However, from day 5 onwards decline in fluoride emission was observed in A2 subcategory. It was concluded that both materials studied (GIC and Zirconomer) exhibited fluoride emission whether or not they were surface-coated for protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10563557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Biomedical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105635572023-10-11 Fluoride release by restorative materials after applying surface coating agents Parashar, Anamika Sharma, Yogesh Kumar Kumar, Sumit M, Kavitha Ghosh Saha, Pallabi Patel, Pragya Bioinformation Research Article The prompt use of an enamel surface covering reagent is advised to safeguard the dental restorative substance from mishaps. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the fluoride emitting capabilities of standard GIC, and Zirconomer cement together with surface coverings and without surface coverings. The conventional GIC cement was part of experimental category A while Zirconomer cement was part of category B. For every experimental categories, a set of sixty brass mould prototypes in the form of disc with dimensions: diameter (6±0.1mm) and thickness (2±0.1 mm) were created and subsequently covered with Teflon strip in accordance with the package recommendations. Also, for both experimental categories, such pellets were randomly allocated to three sub-categories of 20 each. For one category petroleum jelly was administered with a cotton bud and then delicately dried under airflow (A3 subcategory and B3 subcategory); for another sub-category G-Coat was laced through a micro-tip dispenser and light treated for twenty seconds (A2 subcategory and B2 subcategory); the rest 20 specimens were left without any coating (A1 subcategory and B1 subcategory). It was observed that in subcategory A1 and A3 there was continuous decline in emission of fluoride ion as the days progressed. However there was an increase in emission of fluoride in A2 subcategory on moving to day 5 from day 1. However, from day 5 onwards decline in fluoride emission was observed in A2 subcategory. It was concluded that both materials studied (GIC and Zirconomer) exhibited fluoride emission whether or not they were surface-coated for protection. Biomedical Informatics 2023-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10563557/ /pubmed/37822825 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019423 Text en © 2023 Biomedical Informatics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parashar, Anamika
Sharma, Yogesh Kumar
Kumar, Sumit
M, Kavitha
Ghosh Saha, Pallabi
Patel, Pragya
Fluoride release by restorative materials after applying surface coating agents
title Fluoride release by restorative materials after applying surface coating agents
title_full Fluoride release by restorative materials after applying surface coating agents
title_fullStr Fluoride release by restorative materials after applying surface coating agents
title_full_unstemmed Fluoride release by restorative materials after applying surface coating agents
title_short Fluoride release by restorative materials after applying surface coating agents
title_sort fluoride release by restorative materials after applying surface coating agents
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37822825
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019423
work_keys_str_mv AT parasharanamika fluoridereleasebyrestorativematerialsafterapplyingsurfacecoatingagents
AT sharmayogeshkumar fluoridereleasebyrestorativematerialsafterapplyingsurfacecoatingagents
AT kumarsumit fluoridereleasebyrestorativematerialsafterapplyingsurfacecoatingagents
AT mkavitha fluoridereleasebyrestorativematerialsafterapplyingsurfacecoatingagents
AT ghoshsahapallabi fluoridereleasebyrestorativematerialsafterapplyingsurfacecoatingagents
AT patelpragya fluoridereleasebyrestorativematerialsafterapplyingsurfacecoatingagents