Cargando…

Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the effect of the modified ultrasound-guided anterior superior laryngeal nerve block (SLNB) with the traditional ultrasound-guided posterior SLNB in providing intubation conditions during awake tracheal intubation (ATI) in patients without diffic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Qiyuan, Hua, Yusi, Zhou, Ruihao, Chen, Guo, Zhu, Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37813093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2264856
_version_ 1785118371639984128
author Huang, Qiyuan
Hua, Yusi
Zhou, Ruihao
Chen, Guo
Zhu, Tao
author_facet Huang, Qiyuan
Hua, Yusi
Zhou, Ruihao
Chen, Guo
Zhu, Tao
author_sort Huang, Qiyuan
collection PubMed
description STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the effect of the modified ultrasound-guided anterior superior laryngeal nerve block (SLNB) with the traditional ultrasound-guided posterior SLNB in providing intubation conditions during awake tracheal intubation (ATI) in patients without difficult airway. DESIGN: Randomized, assessor-blind. Registration number: ChiCTR2200058086. SETTING: West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. PATIENTS: 104 patients aged 18–65 years, of American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-III, posted for elective general surgery with general endotracheal anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were randomized into two groups (modified group, n = 52; traditional group, n = 52). Modified anterior SLNB or traditional posterior SLNB was performed under ultrasound guidance. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the proportion of acceptable intubation condition (AIC), which was analyzed in both per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) populations. The prespecified non-inferiority margin was −4.8%. Secondary outcomes included intubation success rate on the first attempt, hemodynamic parameters during ATI, time taken for airway anesthesia and intubation, recall of intubation, patient perception of comfort, and incidence and severity of postoperative complications. MAIN RESULTS: In the PP population, the proportion of AIC in the modified group was 49/49 (100%) and that in the traditional group was 49/49 (100%), absolute difference 0, lower limit of 1-sided 95% CI, −0.3%. In the ITT population, the primary outcomes in the modified and traditional group were 52/52 (100%) and 51/52 (98.1%), respectively, with an absolute difference of 1.9% and a lower limit of 1-sided 95% CI of −1.2%. The non-inferiority of modified ultrasound-guided anterior SLNB was confirmed in both populations. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults without difficult airways during videolaryngoscope-assisted ATI, the modified ultrasound-guided anterior SLNB, compared to the traditional posterior approach, showed a statistically non-inferior effect in terms of providing AIC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10563619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105636192023-10-11 Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial Huang, Qiyuan Hua, Yusi Zhou, Ruihao Chen, Guo Zhu, Tao Ann Med Anesthesiology STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the effect of the modified ultrasound-guided anterior superior laryngeal nerve block (SLNB) with the traditional ultrasound-guided posterior SLNB in providing intubation conditions during awake tracheal intubation (ATI) in patients without difficult airway. DESIGN: Randomized, assessor-blind. Registration number: ChiCTR2200058086. SETTING: West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. PATIENTS: 104 patients aged 18–65 years, of American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-III, posted for elective general surgery with general endotracheal anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were randomized into two groups (modified group, n = 52; traditional group, n = 52). Modified anterior SLNB or traditional posterior SLNB was performed under ultrasound guidance. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the proportion of acceptable intubation condition (AIC), which was analyzed in both per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) populations. The prespecified non-inferiority margin was −4.8%. Secondary outcomes included intubation success rate on the first attempt, hemodynamic parameters during ATI, time taken for airway anesthesia and intubation, recall of intubation, patient perception of comfort, and incidence and severity of postoperative complications. MAIN RESULTS: In the PP population, the proportion of AIC in the modified group was 49/49 (100%) and that in the traditional group was 49/49 (100%), absolute difference 0, lower limit of 1-sided 95% CI, −0.3%. In the ITT population, the primary outcomes in the modified and traditional group were 52/52 (100%) and 51/52 (98.1%), respectively, with an absolute difference of 1.9% and a lower limit of 1-sided 95% CI of −1.2%. The non-inferiority of modified ultrasound-guided anterior SLNB was confirmed in both populations. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults without difficult airways during videolaryngoscope-assisted ATI, the modified ultrasound-guided anterior SLNB, compared to the traditional posterior approach, showed a statistically non-inferior effect in terms of providing AIC. Taylor & Francis 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10563619/ /pubmed/37813093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2264856 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Huang, Qiyuan
Hua, Yusi
Zhou, Ruihao
Chen, Guo
Zhu, Tao
Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial
title Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial
title_full Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial
title_fullStr Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial
title_short Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial
title_sort modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37813093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2264856
work_keys_str_mv AT huangqiyuan modifiedanteriorapproachversustraditionalposteriorapproachforultrasoundguidedsuperiorlaryngealnerveblockinawakeendotrachealintubationarandomizednoninferiorityclinicaltrial
AT huayusi modifiedanteriorapproachversustraditionalposteriorapproachforultrasoundguidedsuperiorlaryngealnerveblockinawakeendotrachealintubationarandomizednoninferiorityclinicaltrial
AT zhouruihao modifiedanteriorapproachversustraditionalposteriorapproachforultrasoundguidedsuperiorlaryngealnerveblockinawakeendotrachealintubationarandomizednoninferiorityclinicaltrial
AT chenguo modifiedanteriorapproachversustraditionalposteriorapproachforultrasoundguidedsuperiorlaryngealnerveblockinawakeendotrachealintubationarandomizednoninferiorityclinicaltrial
AT zhutao modifiedanteriorapproachversustraditionalposteriorapproachforultrasoundguidedsuperiorlaryngealnerveblockinawakeendotrachealintubationarandomizednoninferiorityclinicaltrial