Cargando…

Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection

An ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL‐DLLME) of 20 anthelmintic drugs followed and detected by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has been developed, optimized, and validated. The parameters affecting the anthelmintic extraction efficiencies such a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tshepho, Rebagamang, Dube, Simiso, Nindi, Mathew M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37823093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3568
_version_ 1785118396476555264
author Tshepho, Rebagamang
Dube, Simiso
Nindi, Mathew M.
author_facet Tshepho, Rebagamang
Dube, Simiso
Nindi, Mathew M.
author_sort Tshepho, Rebagamang
collection PubMed
description An ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL‐DLLME) of 20 anthelmintic drugs followed and detected by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has been developed, optimized, and validated. The parameters affecting the anthelmintic extraction efficiencies such as selection of extraction solvent (ionic liquids), selection of disperser solvent, volume of extraction solvent, volume of disperser solvent, pH of the aqueous phase, extraction time, salt addition, and centrifugation time were optimized. Validation was conducted according to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808 of 22 March 2021. Validation parameters such as calibration function, matrix effect, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), decision limit (CCα), accuracy, and precision were established. Coefficient of determination (R (2)) values ranging from .99938 to .99995 were obtained using the matrix calibration curve spiked at 0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 times MRL. The LODs and LOQs were calculated using the standard deviation of the response and the slopes of the calibration curves ranged from 0.35 to 26.1 μg/kg and from 1.2 to 87.0 μg/kg, respectively, and were dependent on calibration range. The CCα values ranged from 23 to 1022.0 μg/kg and are also dependent on the MRL concentration levels. The coefficient of variation (CV) values calculated are within the reproducibility range of 16%–30% adapted from the Horwitz Equation CV = 2((1–0.5 log C)) and ranged from 1.7% to 16.9%. The developed and validated and the standard QuEChERS method were compared. The IL‐DLLME LC–MS/MS method was applied to 32 small stock (18 caprine [goat] and 14 ovine [sheep]) liver samples received from municipal abattoirs at Botswana National Veterinary Laboratory for the analysis of anthelmintic drug residues. The results obtained indicated that the anthelmintic drug residues were all below the detection capability, and therefore, the samples were passed as fit for human consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10563727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105637272023-10-11 Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection Tshepho, Rebagamang Dube, Simiso Nindi, Mathew M. Food Sci Nutr Original Articles An ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL‐DLLME) of 20 anthelmintic drugs followed and detected by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has been developed, optimized, and validated. The parameters affecting the anthelmintic extraction efficiencies such as selection of extraction solvent (ionic liquids), selection of disperser solvent, volume of extraction solvent, volume of disperser solvent, pH of the aqueous phase, extraction time, salt addition, and centrifugation time were optimized. Validation was conducted according to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808 of 22 March 2021. Validation parameters such as calibration function, matrix effect, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), decision limit (CCα), accuracy, and precision were established. Coefficient of determination (R (2)) values ranging from .99938 to .99995 were obtained using the matrix calibration curve spiked at 0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 times MRL. The LODs and LOQs were calculated using the standard deviation of the response and the slopes of the calibration curves ranged from 0.35 to 26.1 μg/kg and from 1.2 to 87.0 μg/kg, respectively, and were dependent on calibration range. The CCα values ranged from 23 to 1022.0 μg/kg and are also dependent on the MRL concentration levels. The coefficient of variation (CV) values calculated are within the reproducibility range of 16%–30% adapted from the Horwitz Equation CV = 2((1–0.5 log C)) and ranged from 1.7% to 16.9%. The developed and validated and the standard QuEChERS method were compared. The IL‐DLLME LC–MS/MS method was applied to 32 small stock (18 caprine [goat] and 14 ovine [sheep]) liver samples received from municipal abattoirs at Botswana National Veterinary Laboratory for the analysis of anthelmintic drug residues. The results obtained indicated that the anthelmintic drug residues were all below the detection capability, and therefore, the samples were passed as fit for human consumption. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10563727/ /pubmed/37823093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3568 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tshepho, Rebagamang
Dube, Simiso
Nindi, Mathew M.
Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title_full Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title_fullStr Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title_full_unstemmed Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title_short Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title_sort ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by lc‐esi‐ms/ms detection
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37823093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3568
work_keys_str_mv AT tshephorebagamang ionicliquidbaseddispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionofanthelminticdrugresiduesinsmallstockmeatfollowedbylcesimsmsdetection
AT dubesimiso ionicliquidbaseddispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionofanthelminticdrugresiduesinsmallstockmeatfollowedbylcesimsmsdetection
AT nindimathewm ionicliquidbaseddispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionofanthelminticdrugresiduesinsmallstockmeatfollowedbylcesimsmsdetection