Cargando…

A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy

Estimates of land use change (LUC) attributable to the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) are critical for evaluation of the program’s impacts on air and water quality, biodiversity, and soil quality. To improve our understanding of the range of published estimates, we reviewed 29 studies published...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Austin, K.G., Jones, J.P.H., Clark, C.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112181
_version_ 1785118412644548608
author Austin, K.G.
Jones, J.P.H.
Clark, C.M.
author_facet Austin, K.G.
Jones, J.P.H.
Clark, C.M.
author_sort Austin, K.G.
collection PubMed
description Estimates of land use change (LUC) attributable to the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) are critical for evaluation of the program’s impacts on air and water quality, biodiversity, and soil quality. To improve our understanding of the range of published estimates, we reviewed 29 studies published since 2008 attributing domestic LUC to the RFS, updating previous comparisons and adding a growing number of empirical approaches to estimating biofuel-induced LUC. To identify principal reasons underlying differences in reported effects, we documented key attributes of studies’ methods including spatial extent, time period, baseline scenario, policy influence, and LUC definitions. Across computable general equilibrium (CGE) and partial equilibrium (PE) economic simulation model studies we found a range of 0.01–2.45 million acres of net cropland expansion per billion-gallon increase in biofuels. Empirical approaches reporting national-scale estimates fall within this range, reporting 0.38–0.66 million acres per billion-gallon increase. Empirical studies had a much smaller range of estimates and were closer to PE approaches than CGE. Studies generally did not represent all the potential drivers of biofuel production, and instead reported projections reflecting a combination of RFS impacts and other influences. Additional refinements to the modeling and empirical approaches reviewed in this study can further improve our understanding of the land use change driven by biofuels and the RFS Program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10563800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105638002023-10-10 A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy Austin, K.G. Jones, J.P.H. Clark, C.M. Renew Sustain Energy Rev Article Estimates of land use change (LUC) attributable to the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) are critical for evaluation of the program’s impacts on air and water quality, biodiversity, and soil quality. To improve our understanding of the range of published estimates, we reviewed 29 studies published since 2008 attributing domestic LUC to the RFS, updating previous comparisons and adding a growing number of empirical approaches to estimating biofuel-induced LUC. To identify principal reasons underlying differences in reported effects, we documented key attributes of studies’ methods including spatial extent, time period, baseline scenario, policy influence, and LUC definitions. Across computable general equilibrium (CGE) and partial equilibrium (PE) economic simulation model studies we found a range of 0.01–2.45 million acres of net cropland expansion per billion-gallon increase in biofuels. Empirical approaches reporting national-scale estimates fall within this range, reporting 0.38–0.66 million acres per billion-gallon increase. Empirical studies had a much smaller range of estimates and were closer to PE approaches than CGE. Studies generally did not represent all the potential drivers of biofuel production, and instead reported projections reflecting a combination of RFS impacts and other influences. Additional refinements to the modeling and empirical approaches reviewed in this study can further improve our understanding of the land use change driven by biofuels and the RFS Program. 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10563800/ /pubmed/37818487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112181 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Austin, K.G.
Jones, J.P.H.
Clark, C.M.
A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy
title A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy
title_full A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy
title_fullStr A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy
title_full_unstemmed A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy
title_short A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy
title_sort review of domestic land use change attributable to u.s. biofuel policy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112181
work_keys_str_mv AT austinkg areviewofdomesticlandusechangeattributabletousbiofuelpolicy
AT jonesjph areviewofdomesticlandusechangeattributabletousbiofuelpolicy
AT clarkcm areviewofdomesticlandusechangeattributabletousbiofuelpolicy
AT austinkg reviewofdomesticlandusechangeattributabletousbiofuelpolicy
AT jonesjph reviewofdomesticlandusechangeattributabletousbiofuelpolicy
AT clarkcm reviewofdomesticlandusechangeattributabletousbiofuelpolicy