Cargando…
Micro-doppler radar to evaluate risk for musculoskeletal injury: Protocol for a case-control study with gold standard comparison
BACKGROUND: Beyond causing significant morbidity and cost, musculoskeletal injuries (MSKI) are among the most common reasons for primary care visits. A validated injury risk assessment tool for MSKI is conspicuously absent from current care. While motion capture (MC) systems are the current gold sta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37815998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292675 |
_version_ | 1785118442404184064 |
---|---|
author | Abou Al Ardat, Bilal Nyland, Jennifer Creath, Robert Murphy, Terrence Narayanan, Ram Onks, Cayce |
author_facet | Abou Al Ardat, Bilal Nyland, Jennifer Creath, Robert Murphy, Terrence Narayanan, Ram Onks, Cayce |
author_sort | Abou Al Ardat, Bilal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Beyond causing significant morbidity and cost, musculoskeletal injuries (MSKI) are among the most common reasons for primary care visits. A validated injury risk assessment tool for MSKI is conspicuously absent from current care. While motion capture (MC) systems are the current gold standard for assessing human motion, their disadvantages include large size, non-portability, high cost, and limited spatial resolution. As an alternative we introduce the Micro Doppler Radar (MDR); in contrast with MC, it is small, portable, inexpensive, and has superior spatial resolution capabilities. While Phase 1 testing has confirmed that MDR can identify individuals at high risk for MSKI, Phase 2 testing is still needed. Our aims are to 1) Use MDR technology and MC to identify individuals at high-risk for MSKI 2) Evaluate whether MDR has diagnostic accuracy superior to MC 3) Develop MDR algorithms that enhance accuracy and enable automation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A case control study will compare the movement patterns of 125 ACL reconstruction patients to 125 healthy controls. This study was reviewed and approved by the Pennsylvania State University Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) on May 18, 2022, and the IRB approval number is STUDY00020118. The ACL group is used as a model for a “high risk” population as up to 24% will have a repeat surgery within 2 years. An 8-camera Motion Analysis MC system with Cortex 8 software to collect MC data. Components for the radar technology will be purchased, assembled, and packaged. A micro-doppler signature projection algorithm will determine correct classification of ACL versus healthy control. Our previously tested algorithm for processing the MDR data will be used to identify the two groups. Discrimination, sensitivity and specificity will be calculated to compare the accuracy of MDR to MC in identifying the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the rationale and methodology of a case-control study using novel MDR technology to detect individuals at high-risk for MSKI. We expect this novel approach to exhibit superior accuracy than the current gold standard. Future translational studies will determine utility in the context of clinical primary care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10564143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105641432023-10-11 Micro-doppler radar to evaluate risk for musculoskeletal injury: Protocol for a case-control study with gold standard comparison Abou Al Ardat, Bilal Nyland, Jennifer Creath, Robert Murphy, Terrence Narayanan, Ram Onks, Cayce PLoS One Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Beyond causing significant morbidity and cost, musculoskeletal injuries (MSKI) are among the most common reasons for primary care visits. A validated injury risk assessment tool for MSKI is conspicuously absent from current care. While motion capture (MC) systems are the current gold standard for assessing human motion, their disadvantages include large size, non-portability, high cost, and limited spatial resolution. As an alternative we introduce the Micro Doppler Radar (MDR); in contrast with MC, it is small, portable, inexpensive, and has superior spatial resolution capabilities. While Phase 1 testing has confirmed that MDR can identify individuals at high risk for MSKI, Phase 2 testing is still needed. Our aims are to 1) Use MDR technology and MC to identify individuals at high-risk for MSKI 2) Evaluate whether MDR has diagnostic accuracy superior to MC 3) Develop MDR algorithms that enhance accuracy and enable automation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A case control study will compare the movement patterns of 125 ACL reconstruction patients to 125 healthy controls. This study was reviewed and approved by the Pennsylvania State University Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) on May 18, 2022, and the IRB approval number is STUDY00020118. The ACL group is used as a model for a “high risk” population as up to 24% will have a repeat surgery within 2 years. An 8-camera Motion Analysis MC system with Cortex 8 software to collect MC data. Components for the radar technology will be purchased, assembled, and packaged. A micro-doppler signature projection algorithm will determine correct classification of ACL versus healthy control. Our previously tested algorithm for processing the MDR data will be used to identify the two groups. Discrimination, sensitivity and specificity will be calculated to compare the accuracy of MDR to MC in identifying the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the rationale and methodology of a case-control study using novel MDR technology to detect individuals at high-risk for MSKI. We expect this novel approach to exhibit superior accuracy than the current gold standard. Future translational studies will determine utility in the context of clinical primary care. Public Library of Science 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10564143/ /pubmed/37815998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292675 Text en © 2023 Abou Al Ardat et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Abou Al Ardat, Bilal Nyland, Jennifer Creath, Robert Murphy, Terrence Narayanan, Ram Onks, Cayce Micro-doppler radar to evaluate risk for musculoskeletal injury: Protocol for a case-control study with gold standard comparison |
title | Micro-doppler radar to evaluate risk for musculoskeletal injury: Protocol for a case-control study with gold standard comparison |
title_full | Micro-doppler radar to evaluate risk for musculoskeletal injury: Protocol for a case-control study with gold standard comparison |
title_fullStr | Micro-doppler radar to evaluate risk for musculoskeletal injury: Protocol for a case-control study with gold standard comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Micro-doppler radar to evaluate risk for musculoskeletal injury: Protocol for a case-control study with gold standard comparison |
title_short | Micro-doppler radar to evaluate risk for musculoskeletal injury: Protocol for a case-control study with gold standard comparison |
title_sort | micro-doppler radar to evaluate risk for musculoskeletal injury: protocol for a case-control study with gold standard comparison |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37815998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aboualardatbilal microdopplerradartoevaluateriskformusculoskeletalinjuryprotocolforacasecontrolstudywithgoldstandardcomparison AT nylandjennifer microdopplerradartoevaluateriskformusculoskeletalinjuryprotocolforacasecontrolstudywithgoldstandardcomparison AT creathrobert microdopplerradartoevaluateriskformusculoskeletalinjuryprotocolforacasecontrolstudywithgoldstandardcomparison AT murphyterrence microdopplerradartoevaluateriskformusculoskeletalinjuryprotocolforacasecontrolstudywithgoldstandardcomparison AT narayananram microdopplerradartoevaluateriskformusculoskeletalinjuryprotocolforacasecontrolstudywithgoldstandardcomparison AT onkscayce microdopplerradartoevaluateriskformusculoskeletalinjuryprotocolforacasecontrolstudywithgoldstandardcomparison |