Cargando…

Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership

STUDY DESIGN: Mixed-method consensus development project. OBJECTIVE: To identify the top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Nationwide in Sweden in 2021–22. METHODS: The PSP process proposed by the James Lind Alliance was used. It comprises two main phases: question ident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melin, Jeanette, Axwalter, Emelie, Åhrén, Gunilla, Sunnerhagen, Katharina S., Lundgren-Nilsson, Åsa, Wangdell, Johanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00913-2
_version_ 1785118517982396416
author Melin, Jeanette
Axwalter, Emelie
Åhrén, Gunilla
Sunnerhagen, Katharina S.
Lundgren-Nilsson, Åsa
Wangdell, Johanna
author_facet Melin, Jeanette
Axwalter, Emelie
Åhrén, Gunilla
Sunnerhagen, Katharina S.
Lundgren-Nilsson, Åsa
Wangdell, Johanna
author_sort Melin, Jeanette
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Mixed-method consensus development project. OBJECTIVE: To identify the top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Nationwide in Sweden in 2021–22. METHODS: The PSP process proposed by the James Lind Alliance was used. It comprises two main phases: question identification and priority selection. People living with SCI, relatives of people with SCI as well as health professionals and personal care assistants working with people with SCI were included. RESULTS: In the first phase, 242 respondents provided 431 inputs addressing potentially unanswered questions. Of these, 128 were beyond the scope of this study. The remaining 303 were merged to formulate 57 questions. The literature review found one question answered, so 56 questions proceeded to the prioritisation. In the second phase, the interim prioritisation survey, 276 respondents ranked the 56 questions. The top 24 questions then proceeded to the final prioritisation workshop, at which 23 participants agreed on the top ten priorities. CONCLUSIONS: This paper reveals issues that people living with SCI, relatives of people with SCI as well as health professionals and personal care assistants working with people with SCI find difficult to get answered. The top-priority questions for people living with SCI in Sweden concern specialist SCI care and rehabilitation, followed by a number of questions addressing physical health. Other topics, from the 56 key questions include Mental health, Ageing with SCI, Community support and personal care assistance, and Body functions. This result can guide researchers to design appropriate studies relevant to people with SCI. SPONSORSHIP: The project was funded by the Gothenburg Competence Centre for Spinal Cord Injury and the Swedish Association for Survivors of Accident and Injury (RTP). [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10564619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105646192023-10-12 Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership Melin, Jeanette Axwalter, Emelie Åhrén, Gunilla Sunnerhagen, Katharina S. Lundgren-Nilsson, Åsa Wangdell, Johanna Spinal Cord Article STUDY DESIGN: Mixed-method consensus development project. OBJECTIVE: To identify the top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Nationwide in Sweden in 2021–22. METHODS: The PSP process proposed by the James Lind Alliance was used. It comprises two main phases: question identification and priority selection. People living with SCI, relatives of people with SCI as well as health professionals and personal care assistants working with people with SCI were included. RESULTS: In the first phase, 242 respondents provided 431 inputs addressing potentially unanswered questions. Of these, 128 were beyond the scope of this study. The remaining 303 were merged to formulate 57 questions. The literature review found one question answered, so 56 questions proceeded to the prioritisation. In the second phase, the interim prioritisation survey, 276 respondents ranked the 56 questions. The top 24 questions then proceeded to the final prioritisation workshop, at which 23 participants agreed on the top ten priorities. CONCLUSIONS: This paper reveals issues that people living with SCI, relatives of people with SCI as well as health professionals and personal care assistants working with people with SCI find difficult to get answered. The top-priority questions for people living with SCI in Sweden concern specialist SCI care and rehabilitation, followed by a number of questions addressing physical health. Other topics, from the 56 key questions include Mental health, Ageing with SCI, Community support and personal care assistance, and Body functions. This result can guide researchers to design appropriate studies relevant to people with SCI. SPONSORSHIP: The project was funded by the Gothenburg Competence Centre for Spinal Cord Injury and the Swedish Association for Survivors of Accident and Injury (RTP). [Image: see text] Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10564619/ /pubmed/37474593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00913-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Melin, Jeanette
Axwalter, Emelie
Åhrén, Gunilla
Sunnerhagen, Katharina S.
Lundgren-Nilsson, Åsa
Wangdell, Johanna
Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership
title Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership
title_full Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership
title_fullStr Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership
title_full_unstemmed Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership
title_short Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership
title_sort research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a swedish priority setting partnership
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00913-2
work_keys_str_mv AT melinjeanette researchprioritiestoenhancelifeforpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryaswedishprioritysettingpartnership
AT axwalteremelie researchprioritiestoenhancelifeforpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryaswedishprioritysettingpartnership
AT ahrengunilla researchprioritiestoenhancelifeforpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryaswedishprioritysettingpartnership
AT sunnerhagenkatharinas researchprioritiestoenhancelifeforpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryaswedishprioritysettingpartnership
AT lundgrennilssonasa researchprioritiestoenhancelifeforpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryaswedishprioritysettingpartnership
AT wangdelljohanna researchprioritiestoenhancelifeforpeoplewithspinalcordinjuryaswedishprioritysettingpartnership