Cargando…
Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search
When a highly salient distractor is present in a search array, it speeds target absent visual search and increases errors during target present visual search, suggesting lowered quitting thresholds (Moher in Psychol Sci 31(1):31–42, 2020). Missing a critical target in the presence of a highly salien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37816913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-023-00516-8 |
_version_ | 1785118533813796864 |
---|---|
author | Lawrence, Rebecca K. Cochrane, B. A. Eidels, A. Howard, Z. Lui, L. Pratt, J. |
author_facet | Lawrence, Rebecca K. Cochrane, B. A. Eidels, A. Howard, Z. Lui, L. Pratt, J. |
author_sort | Lawrence, Rebecca K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | When a highly salient distractor is present in a search array, it speeds target absent visual search and increases errors during target present visual search, suggesting lowered quitting thresholds (Moher in Psychol Sci 31(1):31–42, 2020). Missing a critical target in the presence of a highly salient distractor can have dire consequences in real-world search tasks where accurate target detection is crucial, such as baggage screening. As such, the current study examined whether emphasizing either accuracy or speed would eliminate the distractor-generated quitting threshold effect (QTE). Three blocks of a target detection search task which included a highly salient distractor on half of all trials were used. In one block, participants received no instructions or feedback regarding performance. In the remaining two blocks, they received instructions and trial-by-trial feedback that either emphasized response speed or response accuracy. Overall, the distractor lowered quitting thresholds, regardless of whether response speed or response accuracy was emphasized in a block of trials. However, the effect of the distractor on target misses was smaller when accuracy was emphasized. It, therefore, appears that while the distractor QTE is not easily eradicated by explicit instructions and feedback, it can be shifted. As such, future research should examine the applicability of these and similar strategies in real-world search scenarios. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41235-023-00516-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10564694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105646942023-10-12 Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search Lawrence, Rebecca K. Cochrane, B. A. Eidels, A. Howard, Z. Lui, L. Pratt, J. Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article When a highly salient distractor is present in a search array, it speeds target absent visual search and increases errors during target present visual search, suggesting lowered quitting thresholds (Moher in Psychol Sci 31(1):31–42, 2020). Missing a critical target in the presence of a highly salient distractor can have dire consequences in real-world search tasks where accurate target detection is crucial, such as baggage screening. As such, the current study examined whether emphasizing either accuracy or speed would eliminate the distractor-generated quitting threshold effect (QTE). Three blocks of a target detection search task which included a highly salient distractor on half of all trials were used. In one block, participants received no instructions or feedback regarding performance. In the remaining two blocks, they received instructions and trial-by-trial feedback that either emphasized response speed or response accuracy. Overall, the distractor lowered quitting thresholds, regardless of whether response speed or response accuracy was emphasized in a block of trials. However, the effect of the distractor on target misses was smaller when accuracy was emphasized. It, therefore, appears that while the distractor QTE is not easily eradicated by explicit instructions and feedback, it can be shifted. As such, future research should examine the applicability of these and similar strategies in real-world search scenarios. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41235-023-00516-8. Springer International Publishing 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10564694/ /pubmed/37816913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-023-00516-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lawrence, Rebecca K. Cochrane, B. A. Eidels, A. Howard, Z. Lui, L. Pratt, J. Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search |
title | Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search |
title_full | Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search |
title_fullStr | Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search |
title_full_unstemmed | Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search |
title_short | Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search |
title_sort | emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37816913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-023-00516-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawrencerebeccak emphasizingresponderspeedoraccuracymodulatesbutdoesnotabolishthedistractorinducedquittingeffectinvisualsearch AT cochraneba emphasizingresponderspeedoraccuracymodulatesbutdoesnotabolishthedistractorinducedquittingeffectinvisualsearch AT eidelsa emphasizingresponderspeedoraccuracymodulatesbutdoesnotabolishthedistractorinducedquittingeffectinvisualsearch AT howardz emphasizingresponderspeedoraccuracymodulatesbutdoesnotabolishthedistractorinducedquittingeffectinvisualsearch AT luil emphasizingresponderspeedoraccuracymodulatesbutdoesnotabolishthedistractorinducedquittingeffectinvisualsearch AT prattj emphasizingresponderspeedoraccuracymodulatesbutdoesnotabolishthedistractorinducedquittingeffectinvisualsearch |