Cargando…

A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Remimazolam, an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, allows for rapid and reliable arousal. Rapid awakening using remimazolam may be beneficial in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as it allows rapid detection of neurologic deficits. The purpose of this study was to compare arousal time an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitaura, Atsuhiro, Tsukimoto, Shota, Sakamoto, Hiroatsu, Hamasaki, Shinichi, Nakao, Shinichi, Nakajima, Yasufumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37816802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43895-0
_version_ 1785118572202164224
author Kitaura, Atsuhiro
Tsukimoto, Shota
Sakamoto, Hiroatsu
Hamasaki, Shinichi
Nakao, Shinichi
Nakajima, Yasufumi
author_facet Kitaura, Atsuhiro
Tsukimoto, Shota
Sakamoto, Hiroatsu
Hamasaki, Shinichi
Nakao, Shinichi
Nakajima, Yasufumi
author_sort Kitaura, Atsuhiro
collection PubMed
description Remimazolam, an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, allows for rapid and reliable arousal. Rapid awakening using remimazolam may be beneficial in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as it allows rapid detection of neurologic deficits. The purpose of this study was to compare arousal time and outcomes between monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with remimazolam and remifentanil and conventional MAC with dexmedetomidine, propofol, and remifentanil. This study was a single center retrospective study. All TAVR cases performed under MAC (MAC-TAVR) at our institution between 2019 and 2021 were included. Patients were classified by anesthesia method into remimazolam and dexmedetomidine groups. Among 258 MAC-TAVR patients, 253 were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 76 patients were assigned to each group. The time from end of drug-administration to arousal [20.0 (16.0, 24.0) min vs. 38.5 (30.0, 56.3) min, p < 0.0001] and the time from attempted-arousal to arousal [1.0 (1.0, 1.0) min vs. 12.5 (3.0, 26.8) min, p < 0.0001] were significantly shorter in the remimazolam group. There was no significant difference in the length of ICU stay [2.0 (2.0, 2.0) days vs. 2.0 (2.0, 2.0) days, p = 0.157] and postoperative hospital stay [6.0 (4.0, 9.0) days vs. 5.0 (4.0, 8.0) days, p = 0.262]. Trial registration: Clinical trial number: R03-123, Registry URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051635 Registration number: UMIN000045195, Principal investigator's name: Atsuhiro Kitaura, Date of registration: 20 August 2021.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10564871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105648712023-10-12 A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement Kitaura, Atsuhiro Tsukimoto, Shota Sakamoto, Hiroatsu Hamasaki, Shinichi Nakao, Shinichi Nakajima, Yasufumi Sci Rep Article Remimazolam, an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, allows for rapid and reliable arousal. Rapid awakening using remimazolam may be beneficial in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as it allows rapid detection of neurologic deficits. The purpose of this study was to compare arousal time and outcomes between monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with remimazolam and remifentanil and conventional MAC with dexmedetomidine, propofol, and remifentanil. This study was a single center retrospective study. All TAVR cases performed under MAC (MAC-TAVR) at our institution between 2019 and 2021 were included. Patients were classified by anesthesia method into remimazolam and dexmedetomidine groups. Among 258 MAC-TAVR patients, 253 were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 76 patients were assigned to each group. The time from end of drug-administration to arousal [20.0 (16.0, 24.0) min vs. 38.5 (30.0, 56.3) min, p < 0.0001] and the time from attempted-arousal to arousal [1.0 (1.0, 1.0) min vs. 12.5 (3.0, 26.8) min, p < 0.0001] were significantly shorter in the remimazolam group. There was no significant difference in the length of ICU stay [2.0 (2.0, 2.0) days vs. 2.0 (2.0, 2.0) days, p = 0.157] and postoperative hospital stay [6.0 (4.0, 9.0) days vs. 5.0 (4.0, 8.0) days, p = 0.262]. Trial registration: Clinical trial number: R03-123, Registry URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051635 Registration number: UMIN000045195, Principal investigator's name: Atsuhiro Kitaura, Date of registration: 20 August 2021. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10564871/ /pubmed/37816802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43895-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kitaura, Atsuhiro
Tsukimoto, Shota
Sakamoto, Hiroatsu
Hamasaki, Shinichi
Nakao, Shinichi
Nakajima, Yasufumi
A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_full A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_fullStr A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_short A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_sort retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37816802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43895-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kitauraatsuhiro aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT tsukimotoshota aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT sakamotohiroatsu aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT hamasakishinichi aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT nakaoshinichi aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT nakajimayasufumi aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT kitauraatsuhiro retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT tsukimotoshota retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT sakamotohiroatsu retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT hamasakishinichi retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT nakaoshinichi retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT nakajimayasufumi retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement