Cargando…
A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Remimazolam, an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, allows for rapid and reliable arousal. Rapid awakening using remimazolam may be beneficial in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as it allows rapid detection of neurologic deficits. The purpose of this study was to compare arousal time an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37816802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43895-0 |
_version_ | 1785118572202164224 |
---|---|
author | Kitaura, Atsuhiro Tsukimoto, Shota Sakamoto, Hiroatsu Hamasaki, Shinichi Nakao, Shinichi Nakajima, Yasufumi |
author_facet | Kitaura, Atsuhiro Tsukimoto, Shota Sakamoto, Hiroatsu Hamasaki, Shinichi Nakao, Shinichi Nakajima, Yasufumi |
author_sort | Kitaura, Atsuhiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Remimazolam, an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, allows for rapid and reliable arousal. Rapid awakening using remimazolam may be beneficial in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as it allows rapid detection of neurologic deficits. The purpose of this study was to compare arousal time and outcomes between monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with remimazolam and remifentanil and conventional MAC with dexmedetomidine, propofol, and remifentanil. This study was a single center retrospective study. All TAVR cases performed under MAC (MAC-TAVR) at our institution between 2019 and 2021 were included. Patients were classified by anesthesia method into remimazolam and dexmedetomidine groups. Among 258 MAC-TAVR patients, 253 were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 76 patients were assigned to each group. The time from end of drug-administration to arousal [20.0 (16.0, 24.0) min vs. 38.5 (30.0, 56.3) min, p < 0.0001] and the time from attempted-arousal to arousal [1.0 (1.0, 1.0) min vs. 12.5 (3.0, 26.8) min, p < 0.0001] were significantly shorter in the remimazolam group. There was no significant difference in the length of ICU stay [2.0 (2.0, 2.0) days vs. 2.0 (2.0, 2.0) days, p = 0.157] and postoperative hospital stay [6.0 (4.0, 9.0) days vs. 5.0 (4.0, 8.0) days, p = 0.262]. Trial registration: Clinical trial number: R03-123, Registry URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051635 Registration number: UMIN000045195, Principal investigator's name: Atsuhiro Kitaura, Date of registration: 20 August 2021. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10564871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105648712023-10-12 A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement Kitaura, Atsuhiro Tsukimoto, Shota Sakamoto, Hiroatsu Hamasaki, Shinichi Nakao, Shinichi Nakajima, Yasufumi Sci Rep Article Remimazolam, an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, allows for rapid and reliable arousal. Rapid awakening using remimazolam may be beneficial in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as it allows rapid detection of neurologic deficits. The purpose of this study was to compare arousal time and outcomes between monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with remimazolam and remifentanil and conventional MAC with dexmedetomidine, propofol, and remifentanil. This study was a single center retrospective study. All TAVR cases performed under MAC (MAC-TAVR) at our institution between 2019 and 2021 were included. Patients were classified by anesthesia method into remimazolam and dexmedetomidine groups. Among 258 MAC-TAVR patients, 253 were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 76 patients were assigned to each group. The time from end of drug-administration to arousal [20.0 (16.0, 24.0) min vs. 38.5 (30.0, 56.3) min, p < 0.0001] and the time from attempted-arousal to arousal [1.0 (1.0, 1.0) min vs. 12.5 (3.0, 26.8) min, p < 0.0001] were significantly shorter in the remimazolam group. There was no significant difference in the length of ICU stay [2.0 (2.0, 2.0) days vs. 2.0 (2.0, 2.0) days, p = 0.157] and postoperative hospital stay [6.0 (4.0, 9.0) days vs. 5.0 (4.0, 8.0) days, p = 0.262]. Trial registration: Clinical trial number: R03-123, Registry URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051635 Registration number: UMIN000045195, Principal investigator's name: Atsuhiro Kitaura, Date of registration: 20 August 2021. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10564871/ /pubmed/37816802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43895-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kitaura, Atsuhiro Tsukimoto, Shota Sakamoto, Hiroatsu Hamasaki, Shinichi Nakao, Shinichi Nakajima, Yasufumi A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title | A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_full | A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_fullStr | A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_short | A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_sort | retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37816802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43895-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitauraatsuhiro aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT tsukimotoshota aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT sakamotohiroatsu aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT hamasakishinichi aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT nakaoshinichi aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT nakajimayasufumi aretrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT kitauraatsuhiro retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT tsukimotoshota retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT sakamotohiroatsu retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT hamasakishinichi retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT nakaoshinichi retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT nakajimayasufumi retrospectivecomparativestudyofanesthesiawithremimazolamandremifentanilversusdexmedetomidineandremifentanilfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement |