Cargando…

Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls

Introduction: Circulating fetal cells isolated from maternal blood can be used for prenatal testing, representing a safe alternative to invasive testing. The present study investigated the potential of cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for diagnosing monogenic disorders dependent on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeppesen, Line Dahl, Hatt, Lotte, Singh, Ripudaman, Schelde, Palle, Ravn, Katarina, Toft, Christian Liebst, Laursen, Maria Bach, Hedegaard, Jakob, Christensen, Inga Baasch, Nicolaisen, Bolette Hestbek, Andreasen, Lotte, Pedersen, Lars Henning, Vogel, Ida, Lildballe, Dorte Launholt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37829280
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1188472
_version_ 1785118601453240320
author Jeppesen, Line Dahl
Hatt, Lotte
Singh, Ripudaman
Schelde, Palle
Ravn, Katarina
Toft, Christian Liebst
Laursen, Maria Bach
Hedegaard, Jakob
Christensen, Inga Baasch
Nicolaisen, Bolette Hestbek
Andreasen, Lotte
Pedersen, Lars Henning
Vogel, Ida
Lildballe, Dorte Launholt
author_facet Jeppesen, Line Dahl
Hatt, Lotte
Singh, Ripudaman
Schelde, Palle
Ravn, Katarina
Toft, Christian Liebst
Laursen, Maria Bach
Hedegaard, Jakob
Christensen, Inga Baasch
Nicolaisen, Bolette Hestbek
Andreasen, Lotte
Pedersen, Lars Henning
Vogel, Ida
Lildballe, Dorte Launholt
author_sort Jeppesen, Line Dahl
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Circulating fetal cells isolated from maternal blood can be used for prenatal testing, representing a safe alternative to invasive testing. The present study investigated the potential of cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for diagnosing monogenic disorders dependent on the mode of inheritance. Methods: Maternal blood samples were collected from women opting for prenatal diagnostics for specific monogenic disorders (N = 7). Fetal trophoblasts were enriched and stained using magnetic activated cell sorting and isolated by fluorescens activated single-cell sorting. Individual cells were subject to whole genome amplification, and cells of fetal origin were identified by DNA-profiling using short tandem repeat markers. The amplified fetal DNA was input for genetic testing for autosomal dominant-, autosomal recessive-, X-linked and repeat expansion disorders by direct variant analysis and haplotyping. The cell-based NIPT results were compared with those of invasive testing. Results: In two cases at risk of skeletal dysplasia, caused by variants in the FGFR3 gene (autosomal dominant disorders), cell-based NIPT correctly stated an affected fetus, but allelic dropout of the normal alleles were observed in both cases. Cell-based NIPT gave an accurate result in two cases at risk of autosomal recessive disorders, where the parents carried either different diastrophic dysplasia causing variants in the SLC26A2 gene or the same cystic fibrosis disease-causing variant in the CFTR gene. Cell-based NIPT accurately identified an affected male fetus in a pregnancy at risk of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD gene, X-linked recessive disorders). In two cases at risk of the myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DMPK gene, repeat expansion disorder), cell-based NIPT correctly detected an affected and an unaffected fetus, respectively. Discussion: Circulating fetal cells can be used to detect both maternally- and paternally inherited monogenic disorders irrespective of the type of variant, however, the risk of allelic dropout must be considered. We conclude that the clinical interpretation of the cell-based NIPT result thus varies depending on the disorders’ mode of inheritance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10565008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105650082023-10-12 Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls Jeppesen, Line Dahl Hatt, Lotte Singh, Ripudaman Schelde, Palle Ravn, Katarina Toft, Christian Liebst Laursen, Maria Bach Hedegaard, Jakob Christensen, Inga Baasch Nicolaisen, Bolette Hestbek Andreasen, Lotte Pedersen, Lars Henning Vogel, Ida Lildballe, Dorte Launholt Front Genet Genetics Introduction: Circulating fetal cells isolated from maternal blood can be used for prenatal testing, representing a safe alternative to invasive testing. The present study investigated the potential of cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for diagnosing monogenic disorders dependent on the mode of inheritance. Methods: Maternal blood samples were collected from women opting for prenatal diagnostics for specific monogenic disorders (N = 7). Fetal trophoblasts were enriched and stained using magnetic activated cell sorting and isolated by fluorescens activated single-cell sorting. Individual cells were subject to whole genome amplification, and cells of fetal origin were identified by DNA-profiling using short tandem repeat markers. The amplified fetal DNA was input for genetic testing for autosomal dominant-, autosomal recessive-, X-linked and repeat expansion disorders by direct variant analysis and haplotyping. The cell-based NIPT results were compared with those of invasive testing. Results: In two cases at risk of skeletal dysplasia, caused by variants in the FGFR3 gene (autosomal dominant disorders), cell-based NIPT correctly stated an affected fetus, but allelic dropout of the normal alleles were observed in both cases. Cell-based NIPT gave an accurate result in two cases at risk of autosomal recessive disorders, where the parents carried either different diastrophic dysplasia causing variants in the SLC26A2 gene or the same cystic fibrosis disease-causing variant in the CFTR gene. Cell-based NIPT accurately identified an affected male fetus in a pregnancy at risk of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD gene, X-linked recessive disorders). In two cases at risk of the myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DMPK gene, repeat expansion disorder), cell-based NIPT correctly detected an affected and an unaffected fetus, respectively. Discussion: Circulating fetal cells can be used to detect both maternally- and paternally inherited monogenic disorders irrespective of the type of variant, however, the risk of allelic dropout must be considered. We conclude that the clinical interpretation of the cell-based NIPT result thus varies depending on the disorders’ mode of inheritance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10565008/ /pubmed/37829280 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1188472 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jeppesen, Hatt, Singh, Schelde, Ravn, Toft, Laursen, Hedegaard, Christensen, Nicolaisen, Andreasen, Pedersen, Vogel and Lildballe. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Jeppesen, Line Dahl
Hatt, Lotte
Singh, Ripudaman
Schelde, Palle
Ravn, Katarina
Toft, Christian Liebst
Laursen, Maria Bach
Hedegaard, Jakob
Christensen, Inga Baasch
Nicolaisen, Bolette Hestbek
Andreasen, Lotte
Pedersen, Lars Henning
Vogel, Ida
Lildballe, Dorte Launholt
Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title_full Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title_fullStr Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title_full_unstemmed Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title_short Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title_sort clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37829280
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1188472
work_keys_str_mv AT jeppesenlinedahl clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT hattlotte clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT singhripudaman clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT scheldepalle clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT ravnkatarina clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT toftchristianliebst clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT laursenmariabach clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT hedegaardjakob clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT christenseningabaasch clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT nicolaisenbolettehestbek clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT andreasenlotte clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT pedersenlarshenning clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT vogelida clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT lildballedortelaunholt clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls