Cargando…

일제강점기 광견병의 발생과 방역

Rabies became one of the critical zoonoses in the modern urban environment since pet keeping culture became widespread in the Western countries in the 18th century. The sanitary policy against rabies was a forceful tool for the colonial rulers in the 19th century. This study describes the rabies out...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30679409
http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2018.27.323
_version_ 1785118611829948416
collection PubMed
description Rabies became one of the critical zoonoses in the modern urban environment since pet keeping culture became widespread in the Western countries in the 18th century. The sanitary policy against rabies was a forceful tool for the colonial rulers in the 19th century. This study describes the rabies outbreaks in the context of prevention methods, experts’ engagement and the public response to the policies based on the statistics, regulations and newspaper articles on rabies in Korea during the Japanese colonial period. Based on the changes in the rabies policies, this study divides the time period into three phases. First phase (1905- 1914) was characterized with the first epizootics investigation in Korea in 1905 and the “Domestic dog control regulation” in 1909, which legitimated elimination of dogs without owners’ name tags. In the second phase (1915-1926), rabies was designated as a reportable disease by the “Act on Prevention of Domestic Animal Infectious Diseases (1915)” and thousands of dogs were slaughtered every year for rabies prevention. In the third phase (1927-1945), vaccination for dogs became a main intervention. From 1927 to 1942, 760,515 dogs were vaccinated. However, the broad scale rabies control projects over these decades did not seem to decrease the outbreaks of rabies because they did not reflect the rabies situation in Korea. Furthermore, the rabies control policy of the Japanese colonial government was criticized by the public for its violence against dogs and humans, for causing conflicts between social classes, and for lack of understanding of traditional human-dog relationship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10565049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Society for the History of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105650492023-11-07 일제강점기 광견병의 발생과 방역 Uisahak Article Rabies became one of the critical zoonoses in the modern urban environment since pet keeping culture became widespread in the Western countries in the 18th century. The sanitary policy against rabies was a forceful tool for the colonial rulers in the 19th century. This study describes the rabies outbreaks in the context of prevention methods, experts’ engagement and the public response to the policies based on the statistics, regulations and newspaper articles on rabies in Korea during the Japanese colonial period. Based on the changes in the rabies policies, this study divides the time period into three phases. First phase (1905- 1914) was characterized with the first epizootics investigation in Korea in 1905 and the “Domestic dog control regulation” in 1909, which legitimated elimination of dogs without owners’ name tags. In the second phase (1915-1926), rabies was designated as a reportable disease by the “Act on Prevention of Domestic Animal Infectious Diseases (1915)” and thousands of dogs were slaughtered every year for rabies prevention. In the third phase (1927-1945), vaccination for dogs became a main intervention. From 1927 to 1942, 760,515 dogs were vaccinated. However, the broad scale rabies control projects over these decades did not seem to decrease the outbreaks of rabies because they did not reflect the rabies situation in Korea. Furthermore, the rabies control policy of the Japanese colonial government was criticized by the public for its violence against dogs and humans, for causing conflicts between social classes, and for lack of understanding of traditional human-dog relationship. The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2018-12 2018-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10565049/ /pubmed/30679409 http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2018.27.323 Text en © 대한의사학회 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
일제강점기 광견병의 발생과 방역
title 일제강점기 광견병의 발생과 방역
title_full 일제강점기 광견병의 발생과 방역
title_fullStr 일제강점기 광견병의 발생과 방역
title_full_unstemmed 일제강점기 광견병의 발생과 방역
title_short 일제강점기 광견병의 발생과 방역
title_sort 일제강점기 광견병의 발생과 방역
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30679409
http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2018.27.323
work_keys_str_mv AT iljegangjeomgigwanggyeonbyeonguibalsaenggwabangyeog