Cargando…

한국 근현대의료사의 연구동향과 전망 (2010-2019): 사회사적 관점의 부상과 민족주의적 이분법의 약화(†)

In the 2010s, research on modern history of medicine in Korea has yielded notably outcomes. There have been social historical inquiries investigating the organic relationship between medicine and society, and there has been a study overcoming the traditional nationalistic dichotomous approach. A soc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937639
http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2020.29.425
_version_ 1785118613760376832
collection PubMed
description In the 2010s, research on modern history of medicine in Korea has yielded notably outcomes. There have been social historical inquiries investigating the organic relationship between medicine and society, and there has been a study overcoming the traditional nationalistic dichotomous approach. A social historical perspective has been used to analyze the issues of knowledge and politics; the time period of its application was clustered around the colonial period. The condition of colonialism is both important and convenient for analyzing how and to what extent medicine, which is usually deemed neutral, contains a will of authority. Building on existing research, an attempt to understand a subject based on a combination of various elements or from various angles is needed. Accumulating empirical data is important to further advance related research. It is necessary to verify the accuracy of basic facts and build up verified facts. Sometimes theories are applied to research on the history of medicine. However, they are merely a passive application of existing theories and fail to lead to modification and fortification of the theories based on the case of Korea, let alone the establishment of an independent theory. Accumulating empirical studies would help create a unique theory for the Korean case. To establish a new theory, characteristics of the Korean case need to be identified, which have been formed by the Korean tradition. An understanding of the modern situation inevitably leads to an interest in the tradition. Another necessary effort is to expand territories, and one of them would be to develop interests in patients and consumers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10565056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Society for the History of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105650562023-11-07 한국 근현대의료사의 연구동향과 전망 (2010-2019): 사회사적 관점의 부상과 민족주의적 이분법의 약화(†) Uisahak Special Issue Article In the 2010s, research on modern history of medicine in Korea has yielded notably outcomes. There have been social historical inquiries investigating the organic relationship between medicine and society, and there has been a study overcoming the traditional nationalistic dichotomous approach. A social historical perspective has been used to analyze the issues of knowledge and politics; the time period of its application was clustered around the colonial period. The condition of colonialism is both important and convenient for analyzing how and to what extent medicine, which is usually deemed neutral, contains a will of authority. Building on existing research, an attempt to understand a subject based on a combination of various elements or from various angles is needed. Accumulating empirical data is important to further advance related research. It is necessary to verify the accuracy of basic facts and build up verified facts. Sometimes theories are applied to research on the history of medicine. However, they are merely a passive application of existing theories and fail to lead to modification and fortification of the theories based on the case of Korea, let alone the establishment of an independent theory. Accumulating empirical studies would help create a unique theory for the Korean case. To establish a new theory, characteristics of the Korean case need to be identified, which have been formed by the Korean tradition. An understanding of the modern situation inevitably leads to an interest in the tradition. Another necessary effort is to expand territories, and one of them would be to develop interests in patients and consumers. The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2020-08 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10565056/ /pubmed/32937639 http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2020.29.425 Text en © 대한의사학회 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue Article
한국 근현대의료사의 연구동향과 전망 (2010-2019): 사회사적 관점의 부상과 민족주의적 이분법의 약화(†)
title 한국 근현대의료사의 연구동향과 전망 (2010-2019): 사회사적 관점의 부상과 민족주의적 이분법의 약화(†)
title_full 한국 근현대의료사의 연구동향과 전망 (2010-2019): 사회사적 관점의 부상과 민족주의적 이분법의 약화(†)
title_fullStr 한국 근현대의료사의 연구동향과 전망 (2010-2019): 사회사적 관점의 부상과 민족주의적 이분법의 약화(†)
title_full_unstemmed 한국 근현대의료사의 연구동향과 전망 (2010-2019): 사회사적 관점의 부상과 민족주의적 이분법의 약화(†)
title_short 한국 근현대의료사의 연구동향과 전망 (2010-2019): 사회사적 관점의 부상과 민족주의적 이분법의 약화(†)
title_sort 한국 근현대의료사의 연구동향과 전망 (2010-2019): 사회사적 관점의 부상과 민족주의적 이분법의 약화(†)
topic Special Issue Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937639
http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2020.29.425
work_keys_str_mv AT hanguggeunhyeondaeuilyosauiyeongudonghyanggwajeonmang20102019sahoesajeoggwanjeomuibusanggwaminjogjuuijeogibunbeobuiyaghwa