Cargando…
17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*)
This paper aims to redress serious imbalances in the research on ginseng. Most accounts of ginseng treat it as an exclusively East Asian commodity, and are dominated by the natural sciences. Ginseng, however, was much discussed in England and America in the early modern period: the discussion encomp...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for the History of Medicine
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27679470 http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2016.25.273 |
_version_ | 1785118617814171648 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper aims to redress serious imbalances in the research on ginseng. Most accounts of ginseng treat it as an exclusively East Asian commodity, and are dominated by the natural sciences. Ginseng, however, was much discussed in England and America in the early modern period: the discussion encompassed not only botanical and medical interests, but also discourses on the commercial marketability of ginseng; ginseng was also an item that embodied European prejudices, symbolizing perceived ‘differences’ between the West and East. As such, ginseng was an ‘indigenous’ item of ‘the East’ that was much discussed in ‘the West’, but one that resisted assimilation into its systems of knowledge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10565069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Society for the History of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105650692023-11-07 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*) Uisahak Featured Article This paper aims to redress serious imbalances in the research on ginseng. Most accounts of ginseng treat it as an exclusively East Asian commodity, and are dominated by the natural sciences. Ginseng, however, was much discussed in England and America in the early modern period: the discussion encompassed not only botanical and medical interests, but also discourses on the commercial marketability of ginseng; ginseng was also an item that embodied European prejudices, symbolizing perceived ‘differences’ between the West and East. As such, ginseng was an ‘indigenous’ item of ‘the East’ that was much discussed in ‘the West’, but one that resisted assimilation into its systems of knowledge. The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2016-08 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10565069/ /pubmed/27679470 http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2016.25.273 Text en © 대한의사학회 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Featured Article 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*) |
title | 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*) |
title_full | 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*) |
title_fullStr | 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*) |
title_full_unstemmed | 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*) |
title_short | 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*) |
title_sort | 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(ginseng) 인식(*) |
topic | Featured Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27679470 http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2016.25.273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT 1718segiyeongmigwonuiinsamginsenginsig |