Cargando…

17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*)

This paper aims to redress serious imbalances in the research on ginseng. Most accounts of ginseng treat it as an exclusively East Asian commodity, and are dominated by the natural sciences. Ginseng, however, was much discussed in England and America in the early modern period: the discussion encomp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27679470
http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2016.25.273
_version_ 1785118617814171648
collection PubMed
description This paper aims to redress serious imbalances in the research on ginseng. Most accounts of ginseng treat it as an exclusively East Asian commodity, and are dominated by the natural sciences. Ginseng, however, was much discussed in England and America in the early modern period: the discussion encompassed not only botanical and medical interests, but also discourses on the commercial marketability of ginseng; ginseng was also an item that embodied European prejudices, symbolizing perceived ‘differences’ between the West and East. As such, ginseng was an ‘indigenous’ item of ‘the East’ that was much discussed in ‘the West’, but one that resisted assimilation into its systems of knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10565069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Society for the History of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105650692023-11-07 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*) Uisahak Featured Article This paper aims to redress serious imbalances in the research on ginseng. Most accounts of ginseng treat it as an exclusively East Asian commodity, and are dominated by the natural sciences. Ginseng, however, was much discussed in England and America in the early modern period: the discussion encompassed not only botanical and medical interests, but also discourses on the commercial marketability of ginseng; ginseng was also an item that embodied European prejudices, symbolizing perceived ‘differences’ between the West and East. As such, ginseng was an ‘indigenous’ item of ‘the East’ that was much discussed in ‘the West’, but one that resisted assimilation into its systems of knowledge. The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2016-08 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10565069/ /pubmed/27679470 http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2016.25.273 Text en © 대한의사학회 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Featured Article
17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*)
title 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*)
title_full 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*)
title_fullStr 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*)
title_full_unstemmed 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*)
title_short 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식(*)
title_sort 17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(ginseng) 인식(*)
topic Featured Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27679470
http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2016.25.273
work_keys_str_mv AT 1718segiyeongmigwonuiinsamginsenginsig