Cargando…

Identifying, synthesising and appraising existing evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To identify, synthesise and appraise evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and pregnancy. DESIGN: Mixed-methods systematic review, using convergent segregated design. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, MedRxiv, PROSPERO and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slack, Emma, Pears, Katrina Anne, Rankin, Judith, Newton, Julia L, Pearce, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070366
_version_ 1785118658900525056
author Slack, Emma
Pears, Katrina Anne
Rankin, Judith
Newton, Julia L
Pearce, Mark
author_facet Slack, Emma
Pears, Katrina Anne
Rankin, Judith
Newton, Julia L
Pearce, Mark
author_sort Slack, Emma
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify, synthesise and appraise evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and pregnancy. DESIGN: Mixed-methods systematic review, using convergent segregated design. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, MedRxiv, PROSPERO and grey literature sources through 6 August 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included original research studies, expert opinion and grey literature reporting on ME/CFS and pregnancy/post partum (up to 2 years), risk of pregnancy outcomes with ME/CFS or experiences during pregnancy for mother, partner or health and social care professionals following ME/CFS during pregnancy, all where the evidence was relevant to a confirmed ME/CFS diagnosis prior to pregnancy. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Three independent reviewers completed all screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Risk of bias was assessed using the mixed-methods appraisal tool V.2018. Qualitative and quantitative literature was analysed separately using thematic and descriptive syntheses. Findings were integrated through configuration. RESULTS: Searches identified 3675 articles, 16 met the inclusion criteria: 4 quantitative (1 grey), 11 qualitative (9 grey) and 1 grey mixed-methods study. Of the four quantitative studies that reported on ME/CFS severity during pregnancy, two suggested pregnancy negatively impacted on ME/CFS, one found most women had no change in ME/CFS symptoms and one found ME/CFS improved; this difference in symptom severity across studies was supported by the qualitative evidence. The qualitative literature also highlighted the importance of individualised care throughout pregnancy and birth, and the need for additional support during family planning, pregnancy and with childcare. Only one quantitative study reported on pregnancy outcomes, finding decreased vaginal births and higher rates of spontaneous abortions and developmental and learning delays associated with pregnancies in those with ME/CFS. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence on ME/CFS in pregnancy is limited and findings inconclusive. More high-quality research is urgently needed to support the development of evidence-based guidelines on ME/CFS and pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10565252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105652522023-10-12 Identifying, synthesising and appraising existing evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review Slack, Emma Pears, Katrina Anne Rankin, Judith Newton, Julia L Pearce, Mark BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: To identify, synthesise and appraise evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and pregnancy. DESIGN: Mixed-methods systematic review, using convergent segregated design. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, MedRxiv, PROSPERO and grey literature sources through 6 August 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included original research studies, expert opinion and grey literature reporting on ME/CFS and pregnancy/post partum (up to 2 years), risk of pregnancy outcomes with ME/CFS or experiences during pregnancy for mother, partner or health and social care professionals following ME/CFS during pregnancy, all where the evidence was relevant to a confirmed ME/CFS diagnosis prior to pregnancy. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Three independent reviewers completed all screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Risk of bias was assessed using the mixed-methods appraisal tool V.2018. Qualitative and quantitative literature was analysed separately using thematic and descriptive syntheses. Findings were integrated through configuration. RESULTS: Searches identified 3675 articles, 16 met the inclusion criteria: 4 quantitative (1 grey), 11 qualitative (9 grey) and 1 grey mixed-methods study. Of the four quantitative studies that reported on ME/CFS severity during pregnancy, two suggested pregnancy negatively impacted on ME/CFS, one found most women had no change in ME/CFS symptoms and one found ME/CFS improved; this difference in symptom severity across studies was supported by the qualitative evidence. The qualitative literature also highlighted the importance of individualised care throughout pregnancy and birth, and the need for additional support during family planning, pregnancy and with childcare. Only one quantitative study reported on pregnancy outcomes, finding decreased vaginal births and higher rates of spontaneous abortions and developmental and learning delays associated with pregnancies in those with ME/CFS. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence on ME/CFS in pregnancy is limited and findings inconclusive. More high-quality research is urgently needed to support the development of evidence-based guidelines on ME/CFS and pregnancy. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10565252/ /pubmed/37798026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070366 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Slack, Emma
Pears, Katrina Anne
Rankin, Judith
Newton, Julia L
Pearce, Mark
Identifying, synthesising and appraising existing evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review
title Identifying, synthesising and appraising existing evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_full Identifying, synthesising and appraising existing evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_fullStr Identifying, synthesising and appraising existing evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Identifying, synthesising and appraising existing evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_short Identifying, synthesising and appraising existing evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_sort identifying, synthesising and appraising existing evidence relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070366
work_keys_str_mv AT slackemma identifyingsynthesisingandappraisingexistingevidencerelatingtomyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeandpregnancyamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT pearskatrinaanne identifyingsynthesisingandappraisingexistingevidencerelatingtomyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeandpregnancyamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT rankinjudith identifyingsynthesisingandappraisingexistingevidencerelatingtomyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeandpregnancyamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT newtonjulial identifyingsynthesisingandappraisingexistingevidencerelatingtomyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeandpregnancyamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT pearcemark identifyingsynthesisingandappraisingexistingevidencerelatingtomyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeandpregnancyamixedmethodssystematicreview