Cargando…

Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND: A hip fracture in an older person is a devastating injury. It impacts functional mobility, independence and survival. Models of care may provide a means for delivering integrated hip fracture care in less well-resourced settings. The aim of this review was to determine the elements of hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armstrong, Elizabeth, Harvey, Lara A, Payne, Narelle L, Zhang, Jing, Ye, Pengpeng, Harris, Ian A, Tian, Maoyi, Ivers, Rebecca Q
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37783525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002273
_version_ 1785118667656134656
author Armstrong, Elizabeth
Harvey, Lara A
Payne, Narelle L
Zhang, Jing
Ye, Pengpeng
Harris, Ian A
Tian, Maoyi
Ivers, Rebecca Q
author_facet Armstrong, Elizabeth
Harvey, Lara A
Payne, Narelle L
Zhang, Jing
Ye, Pengpeng
Harris, Ian A
Tian, Maoyi
Ivers, Rebecca Q
author_sort Armstrong, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A hip fracture in an older person is a devastating injury. It impacts functional mobility, independence and survival. Models of care may provide a means for delivering integrated hip fracture care in less well-resourced settings. The aim of this review was to determine the elements of hip fracture models of care to inform the development of an adaptable model of care for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for papers reporting a hip fracture model of care for any part of the patient pathway from injury to rehabilitation. Results were limited to publications from 2000. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened based on eligibility criteria. Papers were evaluated with an equity lens against eight conceptual criteria adapted from an existing description of a model of care. RESULTS: 82 papers were included, half of which were published since 2015. Only two papers were from middle-income countries and only two papers were evaluated as reporting all conceptual criteria from the existing description. The most identified criterion was an evidence-informed intervention and the least identified was the inclusion of patient stakeholders. CONCLUSION: Interventions described as models of care for hip fracture are unlikely to include previously described conceptual criteria. They are most likely to be orthogeriatric approaches to service delivery, which is a barrier to their implementation in resource-limited settings. In LMICs, the provision of orthogeriatric competencies by other team members is an area for further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10565304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105653042023-10-12 Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis Armstrong, Elizabeth Harvey, Lara A Payne, Narelle L Zhang, Jing Ye, Pengpeng Harris, Ian A Tian, Maoyi Ivers, Rebecca Q BMJ Open Qual Systematic Review BACKGROUND: A hip fracture in an older person is a devastating injury. It impacts functional mobility, independence and survival. Models of care may provide a means for delivering integrated hip fracture care in less well-resourced settings. The aim of this review was to determine the elements of hip fracture models of care to inform the development of an adaptable model of care for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for papers reporting a hip fracture model of care for any part of the patient pathway from injury to rehabilitation. Results were limited to publications from 2000. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened based on eligibility criteria. Papers were evaluated with an equity lens against eight conceptual criteria adapted from an existing description of a model of care. RESULTS: 82 papers were included, half of which were published since 2015. Only two papers were from middle-income countries and only two papers were evaluated as reporting all conceptual criteria from the existing description. The most identified criterion was an evidence-informed intervention and the least identified was the inclusion of patient stakeholders. CONCLUSION: Interventions described as models of care for hip fracture are unlikely to include previously described conceptual criteria. They are most likely to be orthogeriatric approaches to service delivery, which is a barrier to their implementation in resource-limited settings. In LMICs, the provision of orthogeriatric competencies by other team members is an area for further investigation. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10565304/ /pubmed/37783525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002273 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Armstrong, Elizabeth
Harvey, Lara A
Payne, Narelle L
Zhang, Jing
Ye, Pengpeng
Harris, Ian A
Tian, Maoyi
Ivers, Rebecca Q
Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis
title Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis
title_full Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis
title_fullStr Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis
title_short Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis
title_sort do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? a systematic review with narrative synthesis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37783525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002273
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongelizabeth doweunderstandeachotherwhenwedevelopandimplementhipfracturemodelsofcareasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT harveylaraa doweunderstandeachotherwhenwedevelopandimplementhipfracturemodelsofcareasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT paynenarellel doweunderstandeachotherwhenwedevelopandimplementhipfracturemodelsofcareasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT zhangjing doweunderstandeachotherwhenwedevelopandimplementhipfracturemodelsofcareasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT yepengpeng doweunderstandeachotherwhenwedevelopandimplementhipfracturemodelsofcareasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT harrisiana doweunderstandeachotherwhenwedevelopandimplementhipfracturemodelsofcareasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT tianmaoyi doweunderstandeachotherwhenwedevelopandimplementhipfracturemodelsofcareasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT iversrebeccaq doweunderstandeachotherwhenwedevelopandimplementhipfracturemodelsofcareasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis