Cargando…
Conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions
Conflict and conflict resolution have been argued to be fundamental to the major transitions in evolution. These were key events in life's history in which previously independently living individuals cooperatively formed a higher-level individual, such as a multicellular organism or eusocial co...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37817595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.1420 |
_version_ | 1785118687474221056 |
---|---|
author | Bourke, Andrew F. G. |
author_facet | Bourke, Andrew F. G. |
author_sort | Bourke, Andrew F. G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conflict and conflict resolution have been argued to be fundamental to the major transitions in evolution. These were key events in life's history in which previously independently living individuals cooperatively formed a higher-level individual, such as a multicellular organism or eusocial colony. Conflict has its central role because, to proceed stably, the evolution of individuality in each major transition required within-individual conflict to be held in check. This review revisits the role of conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions, addressing recent work arguing for a minor role. Inclusive fitness logic suggests that differences between the kin structures of clones and sexual families support the absence of conflict at the origin of multicellularity but, by contrast, suggest that key conflicts existed at the origin of eusociality. A principal example is conflict over replacing the founding queen (queen replacement). Following the origin of each transition, conflict remained important, because within-individual conflict potentially disrupts the attainment of maximal individuality (organismality) in the system. The conclusion is that conflict remains central to understanding the major transitions, essentially because conflict arises from differences in inclusive fitness optima while conflict resolution can help the system attain a high degree of coincidence of inclusive fitness interests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10565403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105654032023-10-12 Conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions Bourke, Andrew F. G. Proc Biol Sci Special Feature Conflict and conflict resolution have been argued to be fundamental to the major transitions in evolution. These were key events in life's history in which previously independently living individuals cooperatively formed a higher-level individual, such as a multicellular organism or eusocial colony. Conflict has its central role because, to proceed stably, the evolution of individuality in each major transition required within-individual conflict to be held in check. This review revisits the role of conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions, addressing recent work arguing for a minor role. Inclusive fitness logic suggests that differences between the kin structures of clones and sexual families support the absence of conflict at the origin of multicellularity but, by contrast, suggest that key conflicts existed at the origin of eusociality. A principal example is conflict over replacing the founding queen (queen replacement). Following the origin of each transition, conflict remained important, because within-individual conflict potentially disrupts the attainment of maximal individuality (organismality) in the system. The conclusion is that conflict remains central to understanding the major transitions, essentially because conflict arises from differences in inclusive fitness optima while conflict resolution can help the system attain a high degree of coincidence of inclusive fitness interests. The Royal Society 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10565403/ /pubmed/37817595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.1420 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Special Feature Bourke, Andrew F. G. Conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions |
title | Conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions |
title_full | Conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions |
title_fullStr | Conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions |
title_full_unstemmed | Conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions |
title_short | Conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions |
title_sort | conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions |
topic | Special Feature |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37817595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.1420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bourkeandrewfg conflictandconflictresolutioninthemajortransitions |