Cargando…
Comparative analyses of Linderniaceae plastomes, with implications for its phylogeny and evolution
INTRODUCTION: The recently established Linderniaceae, separated from the traditionally defined Scrophulariaceae, is a taxonomically complicated family. Although previous phylogenetic studies based on a few short DNA markers have made great contributions to the taxonomy of Linderniaceae, limited samp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1265641 |
_version_ | 1785118811916075008 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Rongrong Geng, Yanfei Jia, Yuhuan Xiang, Chunlei Zhou, Xinxin Hu, Guoxiong |
author_facet | Yan, Rongrong Geng, Yanfei Jia, Yuhuan Xiang, Chunlei Zhou, Xinxin Hu, Guoxiong |
author_sort | Yan, Rongrong |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The recently established Linderniaceae, separated from the traditionally defined Scrophulariaceae, is a taxonomically complicated family. Although previous phylogenetic studies based on a few short DNA markers have made great contributions to the taxonomy of Linderniaceae, limited sampling and low resolution of the phylogenetic tree have failed to resolve controversies between some generic circumscriptions. The plastid genome exhibits a powerful ability to solve phylogenetic relationships ranging from shallow to deep taxonomic levels. To date, no plastid phylogenomic studies have been carried out in Linderniaceae. METHODS: In this study, we newly sequenced 26 plastid genomes of Linderniaceae, including eight genera and 25 species, to explore the phylogenetic relationships and genome evolution of the family through plastid phylogenomic and comparative genomic analyses. RESULTS: The plastid genome size of Linderniaceae ranged from 152,386 bp to 154,402 bp, exhibiting a typical quartile structure. All plastomes encoded 114 unique genes, comprising 80 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes, and four rRNA genes. The inverted repeat regions were more conserved compared with the single-copy regions. A total of 1803 microsatellites and 1909 long sequence repeats were identified, and five hypervariable regions (petN-psbM, rps16-trnQ, rpl32-trnL, rpl32, and ycf1) were screened out. Most protein-coding genes were relatively conserved, with only the ycf2 gene found under positive selection in a few species. Phylogenomic analyses confirmed that Linderniaceae was a distinctive lineage and revealed that the presently circumscribed Vandellia and Torenia were non-monophyletic. DISCUSSION: Comparative analyses showed the Linderniaceae plastomes were highly conservative in terms of structure, gene order, and gene content. Combining morphological and molecular evidence, we supported the newly established Yamazakia separating from Vandellia and the monotypic Picria as a separate genus. These findings provide further evidence to recognize the phylogenetic relationships among Linderniaceae and new insights into the evolution of the plastid genomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10565954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105659542023-10-12 Comparative analyses of Linderniaceae plastomes, with implications for its phylogeny and evolution Yan, Rongrong Geng, Yanfei Jia, Yuhuan Xiang, Chunlei Zhou, Xinxin Hu, Guoxiong Front Plant Sci Plant Science INTRODUCTION: The recently established Linderniaceae, separated from the traditionally defined Scrophulariaceae, is a taxonomically complicated family. Although previous phylogenetic studies based on a few short DNA markers have made great contributions to the taxonomy of Linderniaceae, limited sampling and low resolution of the phylogenetic tree have failed to resolve controversies between some generic circumscriptions. The plastid genome exhibits a powerful ability to solve phylogenetic relationships ranging from shallow to deep taxonomic levels. To date, no plastid phylogenomic studies have been carried out in Linderniaceae. METHODS: In this study, we newly sequenced 26 plastid genomes of Linderniaceae, including eight genera and 25 species, to explore the phylogenetic relationships and genome evolution of the family through plastid phylogenomic and comparative genomic analyses. RESULTS: The plastid genome size of Linderniaceae ranged from 152,386 bp to 154,402 bp, exhibiting a typical quartile structure. All plastomes encoded 114 unique genes, comprising 80 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes, and four rRNA genes. The inverted repeat regions were more conserved compared with the single-copy regions. A total of 1803 microsatellites and 1909 long sequence repeats were identified, and five hypervariable regions (petN-psbM, rps16-trnQ, rpl32-trnL, rpl32, and ycf1) were screened out. Most protein-coding genes were relatively conserved, with only the ycf2 gene found under positive selection in a few species. Phylogenomic analyses confirmed that Linderniaceae was a distinctive lineage and revealed that the presently circumscribed Vandellia and Torenia were non-monophyletic. DISCUSSION: Comparative analyses showed the Linderniaceae plastomes were highly conservative in terms of structure, gene order, and gene content. Combining morphological and molecular evidence, we supported the newly established Yamazakia separating from Vandellia and the monotypic Picria as a separate genus. These findings provide further evidence to recognize the phylogenetic relationships among Linderniaceae and new insights into the evolution of the plastid genomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10565954/ /pubmed/37828930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1265641 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yan, Geng, Jia, Xiang, Zhou and Hu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Yan, Rongrong Geng, Yanfei Jia, Yuhuan Xiang, Chunlei Zhou, Xinxin Hu, Guoxiong Comparative analyses of Linderniaceae plastomes, with implications for its phylogeny and evolution |
title | Comparative analyses of Linderniaceae plastomes, with implications for its phylogeny and evolution |
title_full | Comparative analyses of Linderniaceae plastomes, with implications for its phylogeny and evolution |
title_fullStr | Comparative analyses of Linderniaceae plastomes, with implications for its phylogeny and evolution |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analyses of Linderniaceae plastomes, with implications for its phylogeny and evolution |
title_short | Comparative analyses of Linderniaceae plastomes, with implications for its phylogeny and evolution |
title_sort | comparative analyses of linderniaceae plastomes, with implications for its phylogeny and evolution |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10565954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1265641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanrongrong comparativeanalysesoflinderniaceaeplastomeswithimplicationsforitsphylogenyandevolution AT gengyanfei comparativeanalysesoflinderniaceaeplastomeswithimplicationsforitsphylogenyandevolution AT jiayuhuan comparativeanalysesoflinderniaceaeplastomeswithimplicationsforitsphylogenyandevolution AT xiangchunlei comparativeanalysesoflinderniaceaeplastomeswithimplicationsforitsphylogenyandevolution AT zhouxinxin comparativeanalysesoflinderniaceaeplastomeswithimplicationsforitsphylogenyandevolution AT huguoxiong comparativeanalysesoflinderniaceaeplastomeswithimplicationsforitsphylogenyandevolution |