Cargando…

Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: The gold standard for a soft tissue augmentation around implants is a subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG), but the xenogeneic collagen matrices (XCM) started to be used as an alternative. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness XCM in comparison to CTG for the inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashurko, Igor, Tarasenko, Svetlana, Magdalyanova, Mary, Bokareva, Svetlana, Balyasin, Maxim, Galyas, Anna, Khamidova, Marina, Zhornik, Mariia, Unkovskiy, Alexey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37817128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03475-0
_version_ 1785118828173197312
author Ashurko, Igor
Tarasenko, Svetlana
Magdalyanova, Mary
Bokareva, Svetlana
Balyasin, Maxim
Galyas, Anna
Khamidova, Marina
Zhornik, Mariia
Unkovskiy, Alexey
author_facet Ashurko, Igor
Tarasenko, Svetlana
Magdalyanova, Mary
Bokareva, Svetlana
Balyasin, Maxim
Galyas, Anna
Khamidova, Marina
Zhornik, Mariia
Unkovskiy, Alexey
author_sort Ashurko, Igor
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The gold standard for a soft tissue augmentation around implants is a subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG), but the xenogeneic collagen matrices (XCM) started to be used as an alternative. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness XCM in comparison to CTG for the increasing the thickness of the soft tissue around implants. DATA: All studies included at least two parallel groups comparing the use of CTG and XCM with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. As the primary outcome, the amount of soft tissue thickness gain after soft tissue augmentation with XCM or CTG was assessed. Secondary outcomes were clinical and patient-related outcomes; evaluation of aesthetic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and complications. Eligible studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was applied whenever possible. The quality of the evidence of studies including in meta-analysis was assessed using the GRADE approach. SOURCE: A systematic literature search up to January 2022 was conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Cochrane Library, LILACS, eLIBRARY.RU. Unpublished researches, the gray literature, nonprofit reports, government studies and other materials were reviewed electronically using an EASY search. An additional manual search was carried out in November 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Of the 1376 articles from the initial search, 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (306 patients and 325 implants) were included in this systematic review, and 7 studies were part of the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that XCM is less effective than the CTG in increasing soft tissue thickness around dental implants. However, XCM also provides soft tissue thickness gain and can be recommended for use in various clinical situations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown that autologous grafts are more effective than collagen matrices in increasing soft tissue thickness, however, the latter can be used as an alternative. Studies included in previous systematic reviews varied in design, which could lead to limitations. The present systematic review and meta-analysis includes for the first time only randomized controlled clinical trials with collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin in the test group. Tight eligibility criteria were established, and the main parameter studied was soft tissue thickness. It was found that xenogeneic collagen matrix is effective for increasing soft tissue thickness around dental implants, however, the results obtained using an autogenous connective tissue graft are superior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10566022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105660222023-10-12 Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ashurko, Igor Tarasenko, Svetlana Magdalyanova, Mary Bokareva, Svetlana Balyasin, Maxim Galyas, Anna Khamidova, Marina Zhornik, Mariia Unkovskiy, Alexey BMC Oral Health Research OBJECTIVE: The gold standard for a soft tissue augmentation around implants is a subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG), but the xenogeneic collagen matrices (XCM) started to be used as an alternative. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness XCM in comparison to CTG for the increasing the thickness of the soft tissue around implants. DATA: All studies included at least two parallel groups comparing the use of CTG and XCM with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. As the primary outcome, the amount of soft tissue thickness gain after soft tissue augmentation with XCM or CTG was assessed. Secondary outcomes were clinical and patient-related outcomes; evaluation of aesthetic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and complications. Eligible studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was applied whenever possible. The quality of the evidence of studies including in meta-analysis was assessed using the GRADE approach. SOURCE: A systematic literature search up to January 2022 was conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Cochrane Library, LILACS, eLIBRARY.RU. Unpublished researches, the gray literature, nonprofit reports, government studies and other materials were reviewed electronically using an EASY search. An additional manual search was carried out in November 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Of the 1376 articles from the initial search, 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (306 patients and 325 implants) were included in this systematic review, and 7 studies were part of the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that XCM is less effective than the CTG in increasing soft tissue thickness around dental implants. However, XCM also provides soft tissue thickness gain and can be recommended for use in various clinical situations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown that autologous grafts are more effective than collagen matrices in increasing soft tissue thickness, however, the latter can be used as an alternative. Studies included in previous systematic reviews varied in design, which could lead to limitations. The present systematic review and meta-analysis includes for the first time only randomized controlled clinical trials with collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin in the test group. Tight eligibility criteria were established, and the main parameter studied was soft tissue thickness. It was found that xenogeneic collagen matrix is effective for increasing soft tissue thickness around dental implants, however, the results obtained using an autogenous connective tissue graft are superior. BioMed Central 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10566022/ /pubmed/37817128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03475-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ashurko, Igor
Tarasenko, Svetlana
Magdalyanova, Mary
Bokareva, Svetlana
Balyasin, Maxim
Galyas, Anna
Khamidova, Marina
Zhornik, Mariia
Unkovskiy, Alexey
Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37817128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03475-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ashurkoigor comparativeanalysisofxenogeneiccollagenmatrixandautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafttoincreasesofttissuevolumearounddentalimplantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tarasenkosvetlana comparativeanalysisofxenogeneiccollagenmatrixandautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafttoincreasesofttissuevolumearounddentalimplantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT magdalyanovamary comparativeanalysisofxenogeneiccollagenmatrixandautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafttoincreasesofttissuevolumearounddentalimplantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bokarevasvetlana comparativeanalysisofxenogeneiccollagenmatrixandautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafttoincreasesofttissuevolumearounddentalimplantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT balyasinmaxim comparativeanalysisofxenogeneiccollagenmatrixandautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafttoincreasesofttissuevolumearounddentalimplantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT galyasanna comparativeanalysisofxenogeneiccollagenmatrixandautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafttoincreasesofttissuevolumearounddentalimplantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khamidovamarina comparativeanalysisofxenogeneiccollagenmatrixandautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafttoincreasesofttissuevolumearounddentalimplantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhornikmariia comparativeanalysisofxenogeneiccollagenmatrixandautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafttoincreasesofttissuevolumearounddentalimplantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT unkovskiyalexey comparativeanalysisofxenogeneiccollagenmatrixandautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafttoincreasesofttissuevolumearounddentalimplantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis