Cargando…

Remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Training has been used to develop research skills among sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) researchers. Remote education may accelerate transfer of skills and reduce barriers to strengthening research capacity. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of rem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perrotta, Carla, Downey, Vicky, Elabbasy, Darin, Ingram, Carolyn, Lo, Chungwan, Naseer, Amara, Thorson, Anna, Brizuela, Vanessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37817136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16851-w
_version_ 1785118864564027392
author Perrotta, Carla
Downey, Vicky
Elabbasy, Darin
Ingram, Carolyn
Lo, Chungwan
Naseer, Amara
Thorson, Anna
Brizuela, Vanessa
author_facet Perrotta, Carla
Downey, Vicky
Elabbasy, Darin
Ingram, Carolyn
Lo, Chungwan
Naseer, Amara
Thorson, Anna
Brizuela, Vanessa
author_sort Perrotta, Carla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Training has been used to develop research skills among sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) researchers. Remote education may accelerate transfer of skills and reduce barriers to strengthening research capacity. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of remote training on SRHR research and describe enablers and barriers of effective remote training. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scielo were searched up to December 2022 for studies that evaluated in any language online research training programmes either on a SRHR topic or tailored for professionals working in SRHR published since 1990. Characteristics of included studies, the programmes they evaluated, the programme’s effectiveness, and reported barriers and enablers to remote learning were extracted. Three researchers synthesized and described findings on effectiveness, impact and outcomes mapping them against the Kirkpatrick model. Additionally, thematic analysis from qualitative data was conducted to identify themes relating to the barriers and enablers of remote learning. RESULTS: Of 1,510 articles retrieved, six studies that included 2,058 remote learners met the inclusion criteria. Five out of six studies described empirical improvements in participant research knowledge/skills and three studies reported improvements in attitudes/self-efficacy towards research. Follow-up surveys from four studies revealed frequent application of new research skills and improved opportunities for career advancement and publication following online trainings. Cited barriers to effective online SRHR research training included time management challenges and participants’ competing professional obligations; limited opportunities for interaction; and lack of support from home institutions. Cited enablers included well-structured and clear courses, learning objectives and expectations with participants; ensuring a manageable workload; facilitating interactions with mentors and hands-on experience; and selecting programme topics relevant to participants’ jobs. CONCLUSION: Remote SRHR training can lead to improvements in research knowledge, skills, and attitudes, particularly when course learning objectives, structure, and expectations are outlined clearly, and ongoing mentorship is provided. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16851-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10566165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105661652023-10-12 Remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review Perrotta, Carla Downey, Vicky Elabbasy, Darin Ingram, Carolyn Lo, Chungwan Naseer, Amara Thorson, Anna Brizuela, Vanessa BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Training has been used to develop research skills among sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) researchers. Remote education may accelerate transfer of skills and reduce barriers to strengthening research capacity. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of remote training on SRHR research and describe enablers and barriers of effective remote training. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scielo were searched up to December 2022 for studies that evaluated in any language online research training programmes either on a SRHR topic or tailored for professionals working in SRHR published since 1990. Characteristics of included studies, the programmes they evaluated, the programme’s effectiveness, and reported barriers and enablers to remote learning were extracted. Three researchers synthesized and described findings on effectiveness, impact and outcomes mapping them against the Kirkpatrick model. Additionally, thematic analysis from qualitative data was conducted to identify themes relating to the barriers and enablers of remote learning. RESULTS: Of 1,510 articles retrieved, six studies that included 2,058 remote learners met the inclusion criteria. Five out of six studies described empirical improvements in participant research knowledge/skills and three studies reported improvements in attitudes/self-efficacy towards research. Follow-up surveys from four studies revealed frequent application of new research skills and improved opportunities for career advancement and publication following online trainings. Cited barriers to effective online SRHR research training included time management challenges and participants’ competing professional obligations; limited opportunities for interaction; and lack of support from home institutions. Cited enablers included well-structured and clear courses, learning objectives and expectations with participants; ensuring a manageable workload; facilitating interactions with mentors and hands-on experience; and selecting programme topics relevant to participants’ jobs. CONCLUSION: Remote SRHR training can lead to improvements in research knowledge, skills, and attitudes, particularly when course learning objectives, structure, and expectations are outlined clearly, and ongoing mentorship is provided. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16851-w. BioMed Central 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10566165/ /pubmed/37817136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16851-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Perrotta, Carla
Downey, Vicky
Elabbasy, Darin
Ingram, Carolyn
Lo, Chungwan
Naseer, Amara
Thorson, Anna
Brizuela, Vanessa
Remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review
title Remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review
title_full Remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review
title_fullStr Remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review
title_short Remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review
title_sort remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37817136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16851-w
work_keys_str_mv AT perrottacarla remotetrainingforstrengtheningcapacityinsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsresearchasystematicreview
AT downeyvicky remotetrainingforstrengtheningcapacityinsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsresearchasystematicreview
AT elabbasydarin remotetrainingforstrengtheningcapacityinsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsresearchasystematicreview
AT ingramcarolyn remotetrainingforstrengtheningcapacityinsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsresearchasystematicreview
AT lochungwan remotetrainingforstrengtheningcapacityinsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsresearchasystematicreview
AT naseeramara remotetrainingforstrengtheningcapacityinsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsresearchasystematicreview
AT thorsonanna remotetrainingforstrengtheningcapacityinsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsresearchasystematicreview
AT brizuelavanessa remotetrainingforstrengtheningcapacityinsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsresearchasystematicreview