Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of bilateral high-frequency tonic motor activation (TOMAC) in patients with medication-refractory restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS: RESTFUL was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controll...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37458698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad190 |
_version_ | 1785118880726777856 |
---|---|
author | Bogan, Richard K Roy, Asim Kram, Jerrold Ojile, Joseph Rosenberg, Russell Hudson, J Douglas Scheuller, H Samuel Winkelman, John W Charlesworth, Jonathan D |
author_facet | Bogan, Richard K Roy, Asim Kram, Jerrold Ojile, Joseph Rosenberg, Russell Hudson, J Douglas Scheuller, H Samuel Winkelman, John W Charlesworth, Jonathan D |
author_sort | Bogan, Richard K |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of bilateral high-frequency tonic motor activation (TOMAC) in patients with medication-refractory restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS: RESTFUL was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in adults with medication-refractory moderate-to-severe primary RLS. Participants were randomized 1:1 to active or sham TOMAC for a double-blind, 4-week stage 1 and all received active TOMAC during open-label, 4-week stage 2. The primary endpoint was the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) responder rate at the end of stage 1. Key secondary endpoints included change to International RLS Study Group (IRLS) total score from study entry to the end of stage 1. RESULTS: A total of 133 participants were enrolled. CGI-I responder rate at the end of stage 1 was significantly greater for the active versus sham group (45% vs. 16%; Difference = 28%; 95% CI 14% to 43%; p = .00011). At the end of stage 2, CGI-I responder rate further increased to 61% for the active group. IRLS change at the end of stage 1 improved for the active versus sham group (−7.2 vs. −3.8; difference = −3.4; 95% CI −1.4 to −5.4; p = .00093). There were no severe or serious device-related adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were mild discomfort and mild administration site irritation which resolved rapidly and reduced in prevalence over time. CONCLUSIONS: TOMAC was safe, well tolerated, and reduced symptoms of RLS in medication-refractory patients. TOMAC is a promising new treatment for this population. CLINICAL TRIAL: Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Medication-Refractory Primary RLS (The RESTFUL Study); clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04874155; Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier number NCT04874155. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10566236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105662362023-10-12 Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial Bogan, Richard K Roy, Asim Kram, Jerrold Ojile, Joseph Rosenberg, Russell Hudson, J Douglas Scheuller, H Samuel Winkelman, John W Charlesworth, Jonathan D Sleep Neurological Disorders STUDY OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of bilateral high-frequency tonic motor activation (TOMAC) in patients with medication-refractory restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS: RESTFUL was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in adults with medication-refractory moderate-to-severe primary RLS. Participants were randomized 1:1 to active or sham TOMAC for a double-blind, 4-week stage 1 and all received active TOMAC during open-label, 4-week stage 2. The primary endpoint was the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) responder rate at the end of stage 1. Key secondary endpoints included change to International RLS Study Group (IRLS) total score from study entry to the end of stage 1. RESULTS: A total of 133 participants were enrolled. CGI-I responder rate at the end of stage 1 was significantly greater for the active versus sham group (45% vs. 16%; Difference = 28%; 95% CI 14% to 43%; p = .00011). At the end of stage 2, CGI-I responder rate further increased to 61% for the active group. IRLS change at the end of stage 1 improved for the active versus sham group (−7.2 vs. −3.8; difference = −3.4; 95% CI −1.4 to −5.4; p = .00093). There were no severe or serious device-related adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were mild discomfort and mild administration site irritation which resolved rapidly and reduced in prevalence over time. CONCLUSIONS: TOMAC was safe, well tolerated, and reduced symptoms of RLS in medication-refractory patients. TOMAC is a promising new treatment for this population. CLINICAL TRIAL: Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Medication-Refractory Primary RLS (The RESTFUL Study); clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04874155; Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier number NCT04874155. Oxford University Press 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10566236/ /pubmed/37458698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad190 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Neurological Disorders Bogan, Richard K Roy, Asim Kram, Jerrold Ojile, Joseph Rosenberg, Russell Hudson, J Douglas Scheuller, H Samuel Winkelman, John W Charlesworth, Jonathan D Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial |
title | Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (tomac) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Neurological Disorders |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37458698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boganrichardk efficacyandsafetyoftonicmotoractivationtomacformedicationrefractoryrestlesslegssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial AT royasim efficacyandsafetyoftonicmotoractivationtomacformedicationrefractoryrestlesslegssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial AT kramjerrold efficacyandsafetyoftonicmotoractivationtomacformedicationrefractoryrestlesslegssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial AT ojilejoseph efficacyandsafetyoftonicmotoractivationtomacformedicationrefractoryrestlesslegssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial AT rosenbergrussell efficacyandsafetyoftonicmotoractivationtomacformedicationrefractoryrestlesslegssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial AT hudsonjdouglas efficacyandsafetyoftonicmotoractivationtomacformedicationrefractoryrestlesslegssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial AT scheullerhsamuel efficacyandsafetyoftonicmotoractivationtomacformedicationrefractoryrestlesslegssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial AT winkelmanjohnw efficacyandsafetyoftonicmotoractivationtomacformedicationrefractoryrestlesslegssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial AT charlesworthjonathand efficacyandsafetyoftonicmotoractivationtomacformedicationrefractoryrestlesslegssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial |