Cargando…

Health and health system impacts of China’s comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review

China’s comprehensive primary healthcare (PHC) reforms since 2009 aimed to deliver accessible, efficient, equitable and high-quality healthcare services. However, knowledge on the system-wide effectiveness of these reforms is limited. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the reforms’ healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Chang, Xiong, Shangzhi, Millett, Christopher, Xu, Jin, Tian, Maoyi, Hone, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37506039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czad058
_version_ 1785118898657427456
author Cai, Chang
Xiong, Shangzhi
Millett, Christopher
Xu, Jin
Tian, Maoyi
Hone, Thomas
author_facet Cai, Chang
Xiong, Shangzhi
Millett, Christopher
Xu, Jin
Tian, Maoyi
Hone, Thomas
author_sort Cai, Chang
collection PubMed
description China’s comprehensive primary healthcare (PHC) reforms since 2009 aimed to deliver accessible, efficient, equitable and high-quality healthcare services. However, knowledge on the system-wide effectiveness of these reforms is limited. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the reforms’ health and health system impacts. In 13 August 2022, international databases and three Chinese databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies and controlled before-after studies. Included studies assessed large-scale PHC policies since 2009; had a temporal comparator and a control group and assessed impacts on expenditures, utilization, care quality and health outcomes. Study quality was assessed using Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions, and results were synthesized narratively. From 49 174 identified records, 42 studies were included—all with quasi-experimental designs, except for one randomized control trial. Nine studies were assessed as at low risk of bias. Only five low- to moderate-quality studies assessed the comprehensive reforms as a whole and found associated increases in health service utilization, whilst the other 37 studies examined single-component policies. The National Essential Medicine Policy (N = 15) and financing reforms (N = 11) were the most studied policies, whilst policies on primary care provision (i.e. family physician policy and the National Essential Public Health Services) were poorly evaluated. The PHC reforms were associated with increased primary care utilization (N = 17) and improved health outcomes in people with non-communicable diseases (N = 8). Evidence on healthcare costs was unclear, and impacts on patients’ financial burden and care quality were understudied. Some studies showed disadvantaged regions and groups that accrued greater benefits (N = 8). China’s comprehensive PHC reforms have made some progress in achieving their policy objectives including increasing primary care utilization, improving some health outcomes and reducing health inequalities. However, China’s health system remains largely hospital-centric and further PHC strengthening is needed to advance universal health coverage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10566320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105663202023-10-12 Health and health system impacts of China’s comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review Cai, Chang Xiong, Shangzhi Millett, Christopher Xu, Jin Tian, Maoyi Hone, Thomas Health Policy Plan Review China’s comprehensive primary healthcare (PHC) reforms since 2009 aimed to deliver accessible, efficient, equitable and high-quality healthcare services. However, knowledge on the system-wide effectiveness of these reforms is limited. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the reforms’ health and health system impacts. In 13 August 2022, international databases and three Chinese databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies and controlled before-after studies. Included studies assessed large-scale PHC policies since 2009; had a temporal comparator and a control group and assessed impacts on expenditures, utilization, care quality and health outcomes. Study quality was assessed using Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions, and results were synthesized narratively. From 49 174 identified records, 42 studies were included—all with quasi-experimental designs, except for one randomized control trial. Nine studies were assessed as at low risk of bias. Only five low- to moderate-quality studies assessed the comprehensive reforms as a whole and found associated increases in health service utilization, whilst the other 37 studies examined single-component policies. The National Essential Medicine Policy (N = 15) and financing reforms (N = 11) were the most studied policies, whilst policies on primary care provision (i.e. family physician policy and the National Essential Public Health Services) were poorly evaluated. The PHC reforms were associated with increased primary care utilization (N = 17) and improved health outcomes in people with non-communicable diseases (N = 8). Evidence on healthcare costs was unclear, and impacts on patients’ financial burden and care quality were understudied. Some studies showed disadvantaged regions and groups that accrued greater benefits (N = 8). China’s comprehensive PHC reforms have made some progress in achieving their policy objectives including increasing primary care utilization, improving some health outcomes and reducing health inequalities. However, China’s health system remains largely hospital-centric and further PHC strengthening is needed to advance universal health coverage. Oxford University Press 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10566320/ /pubmed/37506039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czad058 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Cai, Chang
Xiong, Shangzhi
Millett, Christopher
Xu, Jin
Tian, Maoyi
Hone, Thomas
Health and health system impacts of China’s comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review
title Health and health system impacts of China’s comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review
title_full Health and health system impacts of China’s comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review
title_fullStr Health and health system impacts of China’s comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Health and health system impacts of China’s comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review
title_short Health and health system impacts of China’s comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review
title_sort health and health system impacts of china’s comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37506039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czad058
work_keys_str_mv AT caichang healthandhealthsystemimpactsofchinascomprehensiveprimaryhealthcarereformsasystematicreview
AT xiongshangzhi healthandhealthsystemimpactsofchinascomprehensiveprimaryhealthcarereformsasystematicreview
AT millettchristopher healthandhealthsystemimpactsofchinascomprehensiveprimaryhealthcarereformsasystematicreview
AT xujin healthandhealthsystemimpactsofchinascomprehensiveprimaryhealthcarereformsasystematicreview
AT tianmaoyi healthandhealthsystemimpactsofchinascomprehensiveprimaryhealthcarereformsasystematicreview
AT honethomas healthandhealthsystemimpactsofchinascomprehensiveprimaryhealthcarereformsasystematicreview