Cargando…

Immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design

BACKGROUND: Selective deep neck flexor muscle activation through craniocervical flexion exercises has been considered to be different from cervical retraction exercises. OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate analgesic effect of craniocervical flexion versus cervical retraction exercises in individuals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takasaki, Hiroshi, Yamasaki, Chisato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37052492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2201918
_version_ 1785118914815983616
author Takasaki, Hiroshi
Yamasaki, Chisato
author_facet Takasaki, Hiroshi
Yamasaki, Chisato
author_sort Takasaki, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Selective deep neck flexor muscle activation through craniocervical flexion exercises has been considered to be different from cervical retraction exercises. OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate analgesic effect of craniocervical flexion versus cervical retraction exercises in individuals with nonacute, directional preference (DP) for cervical retraction or extension METHODS: A two-arm, assessor-blinded, pretest-posttest randomized experiment was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to either craniocervical flexion or cervical retraction exercises and those who were confirmed at the post-intervention examination to have a DP for cervical retraction or extension were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was pressure pain thresholds at the C2 and C5-C6 levels. RESULTS: A total of 10 (mean age = 20.6 years) and nine participants (mean age = 19.4 years) undertook craniocervical flexion and retraction exercises, respectively. One-way analysis of variance demonstrated no statistically significant (p > 0.05) interaction effect regardless of the neck level. In the pre-post change percentages, retraction exercises provided greater analgesic effects compared to craniocervical flexion exercises at the C2 (Hedges’ g = 0.679) and C5-C6 levels (g = 0.637). CONCLUSION: This study showed a comparable or greater immediate neck analgesic effect from cervical retraction exercises compared to craniocervical flexion exercises in individuals with a DP for cervical retraction or extension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10566415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105664152023-10-12 Immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design Takasaki, Hiroshi Yamasaki, Chisato J Man Manip Ther Research Articles BACKGROUND: Selective deep neck flexor muscle activation through craniocervical flexion exercises has been considered to be different from cervical retraction exercises. OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate analgesic effect of craniocervical flexion versus cervical retraction exercises in individuals with nonacute, directional preference (DP) for cervical retraction or extension METHODS: A two-arm, assessor-blinded, pretest-posttest randomized experiment was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to either craniocervical flexion or cervical retraction exercises and those who were confirmed at the post-intervention examination to have a DP for cervical retraction or extension were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was pressure pain thresholds at the C2 and C5-C6 levels. RESULTS: A total of 10 (mean age = 20.6 years) and nine participants (mean age = 19.4 years) undertook craniocervical flexion and retraction exercises, respectively. One-way analysis of variance demonstrated no statistically significant (p > 0.05) interaction effect regardless of the neck level. In the pre-post change percentages, retraction exercises provided greater analgesic effects compared to craniocervical flexion exercises at the C2 (Hedges’ g = 0.679) and C5-C6 levels (g = 0.637). CONCLUSION: This study showed a comparable or greater immediate neck analgesic effect from cervical retraction exercises compared to craniocervical flexion exercises in individuals with a DP for cervical retraction or extension. Taylor & Francis 2023-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10566415/ /pubmed/37052492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2201918 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Takasaki, Hiroshi
Yamasaki, Chisato
Immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design
title Immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design
title_full Immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design
title_fullStr Immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design
title_full_unstemmed Immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design
title_short Immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design
title_sort immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37052492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2201918
work_keys_str_mv AT takasakihiroshi immediateneckhypoalgesiceffectsofcraniocervicalflexionexercisesandcervicalretractionexercisesamongindividualswithnonacuteneckpainandadirectionalpreferenceforretractionorextensionpreliminarypretestposttestrandomizedexperimentaldesign
AT yamasakichisato immediateneckhypoalgesiceffectsofcraniocervicalflexionexercisesandcervicalretractionexercisesamongindividualswithnonacuteneckpainandadirectionalpreferenceforretractionorextensionpreliminarypretestposttestrandomizedexperimentaldesign