Cargando…

The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC

PURPOSE: RTOG 0617 was a phase III randomized trial for patients with unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non–small cell lung cancer comparing standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) radiotherapy and chemotherapy, plus or minus cetuximab. Although the study was negative, based on prior evidence that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weidhaas, Joanne B., Hu, Chen, Komaki, Ritsuko, Masters, Gregory A., Blumenschein, George R., Chang, Joe Y., Lu, Bo, Dicker, Adam P., Bogart, Jeffrey A., Garces, Yolanda I., Narayan, Samir, Robinson, Clifford G., Kavadi, Vivek S., Greenberger, Joel S., Koprowski, Christopher D., Welsh, James, Gore, Elizabeth M., MacRae, Robert M., Paulus, Rebecca, Bradley, Jeffrey D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37728512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0084
_version_ 1785118918086492160
author Weidhaas, Joanne B.
Hu, Chen
Komaki, Ritsuko
Masters, Gregory A.
Blumenschein, George R.
Chang, Joe Y.
Lu, Bo
Dicker, Adam P.
Bogart, Jeffrey A.
Garces, Yolanda I.
Narayan, Samir
Robinson, Clifford G.
Kavadi, Vivek S.
Greenberger, Joel S.
Koprowski, Christopher D.
Welsh, James
Gore, Elizabeth M.
MacRae, Robert M.
Paulus, Rebecca
Bradley, Jeffrey D.
author_facet Weidhaas, Joanne B.
Hu, Chen
Komaki, Ritsuko
Masters, Gregory A.
Blumenschein, George R.
Chang, Joe Y.
Lu, Bo
Dicker, Adam P.
Bogart, Jeffrey A.
Garces, Yolanda I.
Narayan, Samir
Robinson, Clifford G.
Kavadi, Vivek S.
Greenberger, Joel S.
Koprowski, Christopher D.
Welsh, James
Gore, Elizabeth M.
MacRae, Robert M.
Paulus, Rebecca
Bradley, Jeffrey D.
author_sort Weidhaas, Joanne B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: RTOG 0617 was a phase III randomized trial for patients with unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non–small cell lung cancer comparing standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) radiotherapy and chemotherapy, plus or minus cetuximab. Although the study was negative, based on prior evidence that patients with the KRAS-variant, an inherited germline mutation, benefit from cetuximab, we evaluated KRAS-variant patients in RTOG 0617. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From RTOG 0617, 328 of 496 (66%) of patients were included in this analysis. For time-to-event outcomes, stratified log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression models were used. For binary outcomes, Cochran—Mantel–Haenzel tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used. All statistical tests were two sided, and a P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 17.1% (56/328) of patients had the KRAS-variant, and overall survival rates were similar between KRAS-variant and non-variant patients. However, there was a time-dependent effect of cetuximab seen only in KRAS-variant patients—while the hazard of death was higher in cetuximab-treated patients within year 1 [HR = 3.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–10.10, P = 0.030], death was lower from year 1 to 4 (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11–0.97, P = 0.043). In contrast, in non-variant patients, the addition of cetuximab significantly increased local failure (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11–2.28, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION: Although an overall survival advantage was not achieved in KRAS-variant patients, there is potential impact of cetuximab for this genetic subset of patients. In contrast, cetuximab seems to harm non-variant patients. These findings further support the importance of genetic patient selection in trials studying the addition of systemic agents to radiotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE: The KRAS-variant is the first functional, inherited miRNA-disrupting variant identified in cancer. Our findings support that cetuximab has a potentially beneficial impact on KRAS-variant patients treated with radiation. The work confirms prior evidence that KRAS-variant patients are a subgroup who are especially sensitive to radiation. These findings further support the potential of this class of variants to enable true treatment personalization, considering the equally important endpoints of response and toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10566451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105664512023-10-12 The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC Weidhaas, Joanne B. Hu, Chen Komaki, Ritsuko Masters, Gregory A. Blumenschein, George R. Chang, Joe Y. Lu, Bo Dicker, Adam P. Bogart, Jeffrey A. Garces, Yolanda I. Narayan, Samir Robinson, Clifford G. Kavadi, Vivek S. Greenberger, Joel S. Koprowski, Christopher D. Welsh, James Gore, Elizabeth M. MacRae, Robert M. Paulus, Rebecca Bradley, Jeffrey D. Cancer Res Commun Research Article PURPOSE: RTOG 0617 was a phase III randomized trial for patients with unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non–small cell lung cancer comparing standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) radiotherapy and chemotherapy, plus or minus cetuximab. Although the study was negative, based on prior evidence that patients with the KRAS-variant, an inherited germline mutation, benefit from cetuximab, we evaluated KRAS-variant patients in RTOG 0617. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From RTOG 0617, 328 of 496 (66%) of patients were included in this analysis. For time-to-event outcomes, stratified log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression models were used. For binary outcomes, Cochran—Mantel–Haenzel tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used. All statistical tests were two sided, and a P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 17.1% (56/328) of patients had the KRAS-variant, and overall survival rates were similar between KRAS-variant and non-variant patients. However, there was a time-dependent effect of cetuximab seen only in KRAS-variant patients—while the hazard of death was higher in cetuximab-treated patients within year 1 [HR = 3.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–10.10, P = 0.030], death was lower from year 1 to 4 (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11–0.97, P = 0.043). In contrast, in non-variant patients, the addition of cetuximab significantly increased local failure (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11–2.28, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION: Although an overall survival advantage was not achieved in KRAS-variant patients, there is potential impact of cetuximab for this genetic subset of patients. In contrast, cetuximab seems to harm non-variant patients. These findings further support the importance of genetic patient selection in trials studying the addition of systemic agents to radiotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE: The KRAS-variant is the first functional, inherited miRNA-disrupting variant identified in cancer. Our findings support that cetuximab has a potentially beneficial impact on KRAS-variant patients treated with radiation. The work confirms prior evidence that KRAS-variant patients are a subgroup who are especially sensitive to radiation. These findings further support the potential of this class of variants to enable true treatment personalization, considering the equally important endpoints of response and toxicity. American Association for Cancer Research 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10566451/ /pubmed/37728512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0084 Text en © 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weidhaas, Joanne B.
Hu, Chen
Komaki, Ritsuko
Masters, Gregory A.
Blumenschein, George R.
Chang, Joe Y.
Lu, Bo
Dicker, Adam P.
Bogart, Jeffrey A.
Garces, Yolanda I.
Narayan, Samir
Robinson, Clifford G.
Kavadi, Vivek S.
Greenberger, Joel S.
Koprowski, Christopher D.
Welsh, James
Gore, Elizabeth M.
MacRae, Robert M.
Paulus, Rebecca
Bradley, Jeffrey D.
The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC
title The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC
title_full The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC
title_fullStr The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC
title_full_unstemmed The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC
title_short The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC
title_sort inherited kras-variant as a biomarker of cetuximab response in nsclc
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37728512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0084
work_keys_str_mv AT weidhaasjoanneb theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT huchen theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT komakiritsuko theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT mastersgregorya theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT blumenscheingeorger theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT changjoey theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT lubo theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT dickeradamp theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT bogartjeffreya theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT garcesyolandai theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT narayansamir theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT robinsoncliffordg theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT kavadiviveks theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT greenbergerjoels theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT koprowskichristopherd theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT welshjames theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT goreelizabethm theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT macraerobertm theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT paulusrebecca theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT bradleyjeffreyd theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT weidhaasjoanneb inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT huchen inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT komakiritsuko inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT mastersgregorya inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT blumenscheingeorger inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT changjoey inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT lubo inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT dickeradamp inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT bogartjeffreya inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT garcesyolandai inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT narayansamir inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT robinsoncliffordg inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT kavadiviveks inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT greenbergerjoels inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT koprowskichristopherd inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT welshjames inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT goreelizabethm inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT macraerobertm inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT paulusrebecca inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc
AT bradleyjeffreyd inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc