Cargando…
The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC
PURPOSE: RTOG 0617 was a phase III randomized trial for patients with unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non–small cell lung cancer comparing standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) radiotherapy and chemotherapy, plus or minus cetuximab. Although the study was negative, based on prior evidence that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for Cancer Research
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37728512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0084 |
_version_ | 1785118918086492160 |
---|---|
author | Weidhaas, Joanne B. Hu, Chen Komaki, Ritsuko Masters, Gregory A. Blumenschein, George R. Chang, Joe Y. Lu, Bo Dicker, Adam P. Bogart, Jeffrey A. Garces, Yolanda I. Narayan, Samir Robinson, Clifford G. Kavadi, Vivek S. Greenberger, Joel S. Koprowski, Christopher D. Welsh, James Gore, Elizabeth M. MacRae, Robert M. Paulus, Rebecca Bradley, Jeffrey D. |
author_facet | Weidhaas, Joanne B. Hu, Chen Komaki, Ritsuko Masters, Gregory A. Blumenschein, George R. Chang, Joe Y. Lu, Bo Dicker, Adam P. Bogart, Jeffrey A. Garces, Yolanda I. Narayan, Samir Robinson, Clifford G. Kavadi, Vivek S. Greenberger, Joel S. Koprowski, Christopher D. Welsh, James Gore, Elizabeth M. MacRae, Robert M. Paulus, Rebecca Bradley, Jeffrey D. |
author_sort | Weidhaas, Joanne B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: RTOG 0617 was a phase III randomized trial for patients with unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non–small cell lung cancer comparing standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) radiotherapy and chemotherapy, plus or minus cetuximab. Although the study was negative, based on prior evidence that patients with the KRAS-variant, an inherited germline mutation, benefit from cetuximab, we evaluated KRAS-variant patients in RTOG 0617. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From RTOG 0617, 328 of 496 (66%) of patients were included in this analysis. For time-to-event outcomes, stratified log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression models were used. For binary outcomes, Cochran—Mantel–Haenzel tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used. All statistical tests were two sided, and a P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 17.1% (56/328) of patients had the KRAS-variant, and overall survival rates were similar between KRAS-variant and non-variant patients. However, there was a time-dependent effect of cetuximab seen only in KRAS-variant patients—while the hazard of death was higher in cetuximab-treated patients within year 1 [HR = 3.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–10.10, P = 0.030], death was lower from year 1 to 4 (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11–0.97, P = 0.043). In contrast, in non-variant patients, the addition of cetuximab significantly increased local failure (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11–2.28, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION: Although an overall survival advantage was not achieved in KRAS-variant patients, there is potential impact of cetuximab for this genetic subset of patients. In contrast, cetuximab seems to harm non-variant patients. These findings further support the importance of genetic patient selection in trials studying the addition of systemic agents to radiotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE: The KRAS-variant is the first functional, inherited miRNA-disrupting variant identified in cancer. Our findings support that cetuximab has a potentially beneficial impact on KRAS-variant patients treated with radiation. The work confirms prior evidence that KRAS-variant patients are a subgroup who are especially sensitive to radiation. These findings further support the potential of this class of variants to enable true treatment personalization, considering the equally important endpoints of response and toxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10566451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Association for Cancer Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105664512023-10-12 The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC Weidhaas, Joanne B. Hu, Chen Komaki, Ritsuko Masters, Gregory A. Blumenschein, George R. Chang, Joe Y. Lu, Bo Dicker, Adam P. Bogart, Jeffrey A. Garces, Yolanda I. Narayan, Samir Robinson, Clifford G. Kavadi, Vivek S. Greenberger, Joel S. Koprowski, Christopher D. Welsh, James Gore, Elizabeth M. MacRae, Robert M. Paulus, Rebecca Bradley, Jeffrey D. Cancer Res Commun Research Article PURPOSE: RTOG 0617 was a phase III randomized trial for patients with unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non–small cell lung cancer comparing standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) radiotherapy and chemotherapy, plus or minus cetuximab. Although the study was negative, based on prior evidence that patients with the KRAS-variant, an inherited germline mutation, benefit from cetuximab, we evaluated KRAS-variant patients in RTOG 0617. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From RTOG 0617, 328 of 496 (66%) of patients were included in this analysis. For time-to-event outcomes, stratified log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression models were used. For binary outcomes, Cochran—Mantel–Haenzel tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used. All statistical tests were two sided, and a P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 17.1% (56/328) of patients had the KRAS-variant, and overall survival rates were similar between KRAS-variant and non-variant patients. However, there was a time-dependent effect of cetuximab seen only in KRAS-variant patients—while the hazard of death was higher in cetuximab-treated patients within year 1 [HR = 3.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–10.10, P = 0.030], death was lower from year 1 to 4 (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11–0.97, P = 0.043). In contrast, in non-variant patients, the addition of cetuximab significantly increased local failure (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11–2.28, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION: Although an overall survival advantage was not achieved in KRAS-variant patients, there is potential impact of cetuximab for this genetic subset of patients. In contrast, cetuximab seems to harm non-variant patients. These findings further support the importance of genetic patient selection in trials studying the addition of systemic agents to radiotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE: The KRAS-variant is the first functional, inherited miRNA-disrupting variant identified in cancer. Our findings support that cetuximab has a potentially beneficial impact on KRAS-variant patients treated with radiation. The work confirms prior evidence that KRAS-variant patients are a subgroup who are especially sensitive to radiation. These findings further support the potential of this class of variants to enable true treatment personalization, considering the equally important endpoints of response and toxicity. American Association for Cancer Research 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10566451/ /pubmed/37728512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0084 Text en © 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Weidhaas, Joanne B. Hu, Chen Komaki, Ritsuko Masters, Gregory A. Blumenschein, George R. Chang, Joe Y. Lu, Bo Dicker, Adam P. Bogart, Jeffrey A. Garces, Yolanda I. Narayan, Samir Robinson, Clifford G. Kavadi, Vivek S. Greenberger, Joel S. Koprowski, Christopher D. Welsh, James Gore, Elizabeth M. MacRae, Robert M. Paulus, Rebecca Bradley, Jeffrey D. The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC |
title | The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC |
title_full | The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC |
title_fullStr | The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC |
title_full_unstemmed | The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC |
title_short | The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC |
title_sort | inherited kras-variant as a biomarker of cetuximab response in nsclc |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37728512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weidhaasjoanneb theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT huchen theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT komakiritsuko theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT mastersgregorya theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT blumenscheingeorger theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT changjoey theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT lubo theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT dickeradamp theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT bogartjeffreya theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT garcesyolandai theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT narayansamir theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT robinsoncliffordg theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT kavadiviveks theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT greenbergerjoels theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT koprowskichristopherd theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT welshjames theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT goreelizabethm theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT macraerobertm theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT paulusrebecca theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT bradleyjeffreyd theinheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT weidhaasjoanneb inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT huchen inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT komakiritsuko inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT mastersgregorya inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT blumenscheingeorger inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT changjoey inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT lubo inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT dickeradamp inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT bogartjeffreya inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT garcesyolandai inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT narayansamir inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT robinsoncliffordg inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT kavadiviveks inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT greenbergerjoels inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT koprowskichristopherd inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT welshjames inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT goreelizabethm inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT macraerobertm inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT paulusrebecca inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc AT bradleyjeffreyd inheritedkrasvariantasabiomarkerofcetuximabresponseinnsclc |