Cargando…

Breastfeeding rates in England during the Covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: Analysis of national surveys and routine data

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared breastfeeding rates before and during the pandemic using comparable data across time. We used data from two national maternity surveys (NMS) to compare breastfeeding rates in England before and during the pandemic. METHODS: Analysis was conducted using the NMS f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quigley, Maria A., Harrison, Sian, Levene, Ilana, McLeish, Jenny, Buchanan, Phyll, Alderdice, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37819882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291907
_version_ 1785118962051186688
author Quigley, Maria A.
Harrison, Sian
Levene, Ilana
McLeish, Jenny
Buchanan, Phyll
Alderdice, Fiona
author_facet Quigley, Maria A.
Harrison, Sian
Levene, Ilana
McLeish, Jenny
Buchanan, Phyll
Alderdice, Fiona
author_sort Quigley, Maria A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared breastfeeding rates before and during the pandemic using comparable data across time. We used data from two national maternity surveys (NMS) to compare breastfeeding rates in England before and during the pandemic. METHODS: Analysis was conducted using the NMS from 2018 (pre-pandemic; n = 4,509) and 2020 (during the pandemic; n = 4,611). The prevalence of breastfeeding initiation, and ‘any’ breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at 6 weeks and 6 months were compared between these surveys. Data were interpreted in the context of underlying trends in these prevalences from previous NMS (from 2010 and 2014), and annual routine data for England (from 2009–10 to 2020–21). Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) for the effect of birth during the pandemic (2020 versus 2018) on breastfeeding, with adjustment for sociodemographic and birth-related factors. RESULTS: Breastfeeding initiation and any breastfeeding at 6 weeks remained relatively constant in the NMS and the routine data. Birth during the pandemic was associated with a 3 percentage point decrease in EBF at 6 weeks in the NMS (aRR 0.92, 95%CI: 0.87, 0.98 for pandemic versus pre-pandemic), but a smaller decrease in the routine data. Birth during the pandemic was associated with a 3 percentage point increase in any breastfeeding at 6 months in the NMS (aRR 1.05, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.10). Breastfeeding varied across different groups of women in the NMS (i.e. marked inequalities), but the small changes observed between the pandemic and pre-pandemic NMS were broadly similar across the sociodemographic and birth-related factors examined (i.e. no change in inequalities). CONCLUSION: Breastfeeding initiation and any breastfeeding at 6 weeks in England were unaffected by the pandemic, and the persistent inequalities in breastfeeding did not widen. Services should aim to reduce these inequalities in breastfeeding which have been documented since the 1970s.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10566678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105666782023-10-12 Breastfeeding rates in England during the Covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: Analysis of national surveys and routine data Quigley, Maria A. Harrison, Sian Levene, Ilana McLeish, Jenny Buchanan, Phyll Alderdice, Fiona PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared breastfeeding rates before and during the pandemic using comparable data across time. We used data from two national maternity surveys (NMS) to compare breastfeeding rates in England before and during the pandemic. METHODS: Analysis was conducted using the NMS from 2018 (pre-pandemic; n = 4,509) and 2020 (during the pandemic; n = 4,611). The prevalence of breastfeeding initiation, and ‘any’ breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at 6 weeks and 6 months were compared between these surveys. Data were interpreted in the context of underlying trends in these prevalences from previous NMS (from 2010 and 2014), and annual routine data for England (from 2009–10 to 2020–21). Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) for the effect of birth during the pandemic (2020 versus 2018) on breastfeeding, with adjustment for sociodemographic and birth-related factors. RESULTS: Breastfeeding initiation and any breastfeeding at 6 weeks remained relatively constant in the NMS and the routine data. Birth during the pandemic was associated with a 3 percentage point decrease in EBF at 6 weeks in the NMS (aRR 0.92, 95%CI: 0.87, 0.98 for pandemic versus pre-pandemic), but a smaller decrease in the routine data. Birth during the pandemic was associated with a 3 percentage point increase in any breastfeeding at 6 months in the NMS (aRR 1.05, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.10). Breastfeeding varied across different groups of women in the NMS (i.e. marked inequalities), but the small changes observed between the pandemic and pre-pandemic NMS were broadly similar across the sociodemographic and birth-related factors examined (i.e. no change in inequalities). CONCLUSION: Breastfeeding initiation and any breastfeeding at 6 weeks in England were unaffected by the pandemic, and the persistent inequalities in breastfeeding did not widen. Services should aim to reduce these inequalities in breastfeeding which have been documented since the 1970s. Public Library of Science 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10566678/ /pubmed/37819882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291907 Text en © 2023 Quigley et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Quigley, Maria A.
Harrison, Sian
Levene, Ilana
McLeish, Jenny
Buchanan, Phyll
Alderdice, Fiona
Breastfeeding rates in England during the Covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: Analysis of national surveys and routine data
title Breastfeeding rates in England during the Covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: Analysis of national surveys and routine data
title_full Breastfeeding rates in England during the Covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: Analysis of national surveys and routine data
title_fullStr Breastfeeding rates in England during the Covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: Analysis of national surveys and routine data
title_full_unstemmed Breastfeeding rates in England during the Covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: Analysis of national surveys and routine data
title_short Breastfeeding rates in England during the Covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: Analysis of national surveys and routine data
title_sort breastfeeding rates in england during the covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: analysis of national surveys and routine data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37819882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291907
work_keys_str_mv AT quigleymariaa breastfeedingratesinenglandduringthecovid19pandemicandthepreviousdecadeanalysisofnationalsurveysandroutinedata
AT harrisonsian breastfeedingratesinenglandduringthecovid19pandemicandthepreviousdecadeanalysisofnationalsurveysandroutinedata
AT leveneilana breastfeedingratesinenglandduringthecovid19pandemicandthepreviousdecadeanalysisofnationalsurveysandroutinedata
AT mcleishjenny breastfeedingratesinenglandduringthecovid19pandemicandthepreviousdecadeanalysisofnationalsurveysandroutinedata
AT buchananphyll breastfeedingratesinenglandduringthecovid19pandemicandthepreviousdecadeanalysisofnationalsurveysandroutinedata
AT alderdicefiona breastfeedingratesinenglandduringthecovid19pandemicandthepreviousdecadeanalysisofnationalsurveysandroutinedata