Cargando…
Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement
BACKGROUND: Simple and efficient survey measures to predict staying in or leaving work are needed. We examined the association of single-item self-rated work ability (SRWA) with disability retirement in two large population-based samples and compared the association of SRWA to two other scales, work...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad121 |
_version_ | 1785119055735160832 |
---|---|
author | Kainulainen, Sakari Elovainio, Marko Laaksonen, Mikko Jääskeläinen, Tuija Rissanen, Harri Koskinen, Seppo |
author_facet | Kainulainen, Sakari Elovainio, Marko Laaksonen, Mikko Jääskeläinen, Tuija Rissanen, Harri Koskinen, Seppo |
author_sort | Kainulainen, Sakari |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Simple and efficient survey measures to predict staying in or leaving work are needed. We examined the association of single-item self-rated work ability (SRWA) with disability retirement in two large population-based samples and compared the association of SRWA to two other scales, work ability score (WAS) and self-rated health (SRH), used earlier in studies. METHODS: The study population comprised 6034 participants aged 35–58 from the population-based Health 2000 and FinHealth 2017 cohort studies, pooled together. SRWA, WAS and SRH were all classified in three categories: poor, limited and good. A 36-month follow-up for disability retirement via linkage to electronic records was included in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the participants, 195 retired during the follow-up. All three measures strongly predicted disability retirement. Hazard ratio (HR) for poor SRWA (vs. good) was 8.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.41–13.28], WAS 7.99 (95% CI 5.62–11.37) and SRH 5.96 (95% CI 4.17–8.51). HR for limited SRWA (vs. good) was 4.35 (95% CI 3.21–5.91), WAS 3.54 (95% CI 2.49–5.04) and SRH 2.27 (95% CI 1.59–3.23). Taking into account gender, age, education and mental health narrowed the gap between poor and limited vs. good work ability as predictors of disability retirement, but the differences remained clear. CONCLUSIONS: Limited or poor self-rated work ability or health are strong predictors of disability retirement. The SRWA measure is a useful survey-measure of work ability in community-based surveys. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10567125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105671252023-10-12 Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement Kainulainen, Sakari Elovainio, Marko Laaksonen, Mikko Jääskeläinen, Tuija Rissanen, Harri Koskinen, Seppo Eur J Public Health Work and Health BACKGROUND: Simple and efficient survey measures to predict staying in or leaving work are needed. We examined the association of single-item self-rated work ability (SRWA) with disability retirement in two large population-based samples and compared the association of SRWA to two other scales, work ability score (WAS) and self-rated health (SRH), used earlier in studies. METHODS: The study population comprised 6034 participants aged 35–58 from the population-based Health 2000 and FinHealth 2017 cohort studies, pooled together. SRWA, WAS and SRH were all classified in three categories: poor, limited and good. A 36-month follow-up for disability retirement via linkage to electronic records was included in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the participants, 195 retired during the follow-up. All three measures strongly predicted disability retirement. Hazard ratio (HR) for poor SRWA (vs. good) was 8.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.41–13.28], WAS 7.99 (95% CI 5.62–11.37) and SRH 5.96 (95% CI 4.17–8.51). HR for limited SRWA (vs. good) was 4.35 (95% CI 3.21–5.91), WAS 3.54 (95% CI 2.49–5.04) and SRH 2.27 (95% CI 1.59–3.23). Taking into account gender, age, education and mental health narrowed the gap between poor and limited vs. good work ability as predictors of disability retirement, but the differences remained clear. CONCLUSIONS: Limited or poor self-rated work ability or health are strong predictors of disability retirement. The SRWA measure is a useful survey-measure of work ability in community-based surveys. Oxford University Press 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10567125/ /pubmed/37441765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad121 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Work and Health Kainulainen, Sakari Elovainio, Marko Laaksonen, Mikko Jääskeläinen, Tuija Rissanen, Harri Koskinen, Seppo Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement |
title | Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement |
title_full | Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement |
title_fullStr | Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement |
title_short | Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement |
title_sort | self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement |
topic | Work and Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kainulainensakari selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement AT elovainiomarko selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement AT laaksonenmikko selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement AT jaaskelainentuija selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement AT rissanenharri selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement AT koskinenseppo selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement |