Cargando…

Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement

BACKGROUND: Simple and efficient survey measures to predict staying in or leaving work are needed. We examined the association of single-item self-rated work ability (SRWA) with disability retirement in two large population-based samples and compared the association of SRWA to two other scales, work...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kainulainen, Sakari, Elovainio, Marko, Laaksonen, Mikko, Jääskeläinen, Tuija, Rissanen, Harri, Koskinen, Seppo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad121
_version_ 1785119055735160832
author Kainulainen, Sakari
Elovainio, Marko
Laaksonen, Mikko
Jääskeläinen, Tuija
Rissanen, Harri
Koskinen, Seppo
author_facet Kainulainen, Sakari
Elovainio, Marko
Laaksonen, Mikko
Jääskeläinen, Tuija
Rissanen, Harri
Koskinen, Seppo
author_sort Kainulainen, Sakari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Simple and efficient survey measures to predict staying in or leaving work are needed. We examined the association of single-item self-rated work ability (SRWA) with disability retirement in two large population-based samples and compared the association of SRWA to two other scales, work ability score (WAS) and self-rated health (SRH), used earlier in studies. METHODS: The study population comprised 6034 participants aged 35–58 from the population-based Health 2000 and FinHealth 2017 cohort studies, pooled together. SRWA, WAS and SRH were all classified in three categories: poor, limited and good. A 36-month follow-up for disability retirement via linkage to electronic records was included in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the participants, 195 retired during the follow-up. All three measures strongly predicted disability retirement. Hazard ratio (HR) for poor SRWA (vs. good) was 8.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.41–13.28], WAS 7.99 (95% CI 5.62–11.37) and SRH 5.96 (95% CI 4.17–8.51). HR for limited SRWA (vs. good) was 4.35 (95% CI 3.21–5.91), WAS 3.54 (95% CI 2.49–5.04) and SRH 2.27 (95% CI 1.59–3.23). Taking into account gender, age, education and mental health narrowed the gap between poor and limited vs. good work ability as predictors of disability retirement, but the differences remained clear. CONCLUSIONS: Limited or poor self-rated work ability or health are strong predictors of disability retirement. The SRWA measure is a useful survey-measure of work ability in community-based surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10567125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105671252023-10-12 Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement Kainulainen, Sakari Elovainio, Marko Laaksonen, Mikko Jääskeläinen, Tuija Rissanen, Harri Koskinen, Seppo Eur J Public Health Work and Health BACKGROUND: Simple and efficient survey measures to predict staying in or leaving work are needed. We examined the association of single-item self-rated work ability (SRWA) with disability retirement in two large population-based samples and compared the association of SRWA to two other scales, work ability score (WAS) and self-rated health (SRH), used earlier in studies. METHODS: The study population comprised 6034 participants aged 35–58 from the population-based Health 2000 and FinHealth 2017 cohort studies, pooled together. SRWA, WAS and SRH were all classified in three categories: poor, limited and good. A 36-month follow-up for disability retirement via linkage to electronic records was included in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the participants, 195 retired during the follow-up. All three measures strongly predicted disability retirement. Hazard ratio (HR) for poor SRWA (vs. good) was 8.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.41–13.28], WAS 7.99 (95% CI 5.62–11.37) and SRH 5.96 (95% CI 4.17–8.51). HR for limited SRWA (vs. good) was 4.35 (95% CI 3.21–5.91), WAS 3.54 (95% CI 2.49–5.04) and SRH 2.27 (95% CI 1.59–3.23). Taking into account gender, age, education and mental health narrowed the gap between poor and limited vs. good work ability as predictors of disability retirement, but the differences remained clear. CONCLUSIONS: Limited or poor self-rated work ability or health are strong predictors of disability retirement. The SRWA measure is a useful survey-measure of work ability in community-based surveys. Oxford University Press 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10567125/ /pubmed/37441765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad121 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Work and Health
Kainulainen, Sakari
Elovainio, Marko
Laaksonen, Mikko
Jääskeläinen, Tuija
Rissanen, Harri
Koskinen, Seppo
Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement
title Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement
title_full Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement
title_fullStr Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement
title_full_unstemmed Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement
title_short Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement
title_sort self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement
topic Work and Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad121
work_keys_str_mv AT kainulainensakari selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement
AT elovainiomarko selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement
AT laaksonenmikko selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement
AT jaaskelainentuija selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement
AT rissanenharri selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement
AT koskinenseppo selfratedworkabilityasariskfactorfordisabilityretirement