Cargando…

Real‐time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: an updated cost‐effectiveness analysis

AIMS: Previous cost‐effectiveness analysis suggests that CardioMEMS is cost‐effective compared with usual care for patients with persistent New York Heart Association class III symptoms and at least one heart failure (HF) hospitalization within 12 months. The aim of the paper is to perform an update...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cowie, Martin R., Thokala, Praveen, Ihara, Zenichi, Adamson, Philip B., Angermann, Christiane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37591524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14496
_version_ 1785119171447619584
author Cowie, Martin R.
Thokala, Praveen
Ihara, Zenichi
Adamson, Philip B.
Angermann, Christiane
author_facet Cowie, Martin R.
Thokala, Praveen
Ihara, Zenichi
Adamson, Philip B.
Angermann, Christiane
author_sort Cowie, Martin R.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Previous cost‐effectiveness analysis suggests that CardioMEMS is cost‐effective compared with usual care for patients with persistent New York Heart Association class III symptoms and at least one heart failure (HF) hospitalization within 12 months. The aim of the paper is to perform an update of the cost‐effectiveness analysis of CardioMEMS using the most recent data from the published literature. METHODS AND RESULTS: A Microsoft Excel Markov model from a previous UK cost‐effectiveness study of CardioMEMS was updated using the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP)‐guided treatment derived from the pivotal trials. The model included the device costs (and the implantation procedure and related complications), costs of remote monitoring, costs of HF‐related hospitalizations, and costs of usual care. Quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated based on utilities from pivotal trials and published literature. Cost‐effectiveness results were estimated as incremental cost per QALY gained of CardioMEMS compared with usual care. Scenario analyses were also performed using data from real‐world studies that showed a significant decrease in HF‐related hospitalizations. In the base case analysis over a time horizon of 10 years, PAP‐guided HF therapy increased cost compared with usual care by £6337 (i.e. from £22 770 in usual care to £29 107 in PAP‐guided HF therapy) and the QALYs per patient for usual care and PAP‐guided patients were 2.62 and 2.94, respectively, reflecting an increase of 0.32 QALYs with PAP‐guided treatment. The resultant incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER), the ratio between incremental costs and the QALYs, is estimated at £19 761/QALY. Scenario analyses suggest that the ICER for CardioMEMS can range from being dominant to £27 910/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested that PAP‐guided HF therapy has 81.9% probability of being cost‐effective at a threshold of £30 000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that CardioMEMS is likely to be cost‐effective in the United Kingdom, at the currently considered thresholds of £20 000–30 000/QALY.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10567632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105676322023-10-13 Real‐time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: an updated cost‐effectiveness analysis Cowie, Martin R. Thokala, Praveen Ihara, Zenichi Adamson, Philip B. Angermann, Christiane ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: Previous cost‐effectiveness analysis suggests that CardioMEMS is cost‐effective compared with usual care for patients with persistent New York Heart Association class III symptoms and at least one heart failure (HF) hospitalization within 12 months. The aim of the paper is to perform an update of the cost‐effectiveness analysis of CardioMEMS using the most recent data from the published literature. METHODS AND RESULTS: A Microsoft Excel Markov model from a previous UK cost‐effectiveness study of CardioMEMS was updated using the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP)‐guided treatment derived from the pivotal trials. The model included the device costs (and the implantation procedure and related complications), costs of remote monitoring, costs of HF‐related hospitalizations, and costs of usual care. Quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated based on utilities from pivotal trials and published literature. Cost‐effectiveness results were estimated as incremental cost per QALY gained of CardioMEMS compared with usual care. Scenario analyses were also performed using data from real‐world studies that showed a significant decrease in HF‐related hospitalizations. In the base case analysis over a time horizon of 10 years, PAP‐guided HF therapy increased cost compared with usual care by £6337 (i.e. from £22 770 in usual care to £29 107 in PAP‐guided HF therapy) and the QALYs per patient for usual care and PAP‐guided patients were 2.62 and 2.94, respectively, reflecting an increase of 0.32 QALYs with PAP‐guided treatment. The resultant incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER), the ratio between incremental costs and the QALYs, is estimated at £19 761/QALY. Scenario analyses suggest that the ICER for CardioMEMS can range from being dominant to £27 910/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested that PAP‐guided HF therapy has 81.9% probability of being cost‐effective at a threshold of £30 000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that CardioMEMS is likely to be cost‐effective in the United Kingdom, at the currently considered thresholds of £20 000–30 000/QALY. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10567632/ /pubmed/37591524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14496 Text en © 2023 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cowie, Martin R.
Thokala, Praveen
Ihara, Zenichi
Adamson, Philip B.
Angermann, Christiane
Real‐time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: an updated cost‐effectiveness analysis
title Real‐time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: an updated cost‐effectiveness analysis
title_full Real‐time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: an updated cost‐effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Real‐time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: an updated cost‐effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Real‐time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: an updated cost‐effectiveness analysis
title_short Real‐time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: an updated cost‐effectiveness analysis
title_sort real‐time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: an updated cost‐effectiveness analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37591524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14496
work_keys_str_mv AT cowiemartinr realtimepulmonaryarterypressuremonitoringinheartfailurepatientsanupdatedcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT thokalapraveen realtimepulmonaryarterypressuremonitoringinheartfailurepatientsanupdatedcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT iharazenichi realtimepulmonaryarterypressuremonitoringinheartfailurepatientsanupdatedcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT adamsonphilipb realtimepulmonaryarterypressuremonitoringinheartfailurepatientsanupdatedcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT angermannchristiane realtimepulmonaryarterypressuremonitoringinheartfailurepatientsanupdatedcosteffectivenessanalysis