Cargando…
Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review
Craniofacial superimposition requires the photographic registration of a skull at transparency to a photograph of an antemortem (AM) face so that anatomical concordance between the two can be assessed. When the camera vantage point of the AM photograph is exactly replicated for skull photography, th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37702755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03081-3 |
_version_ | 1785119236722524160 |
---|---|
author | Healy, Sean S. Stephan, Carl N. |
author_facet | Healy, Sean S. Stephan, Carl N. |
author_sort | Healy, Sean S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Craniofacial superimposition requires the photographic registration of a skull at transparency to a photograph of an antemortem (AM) face so that anatomical concordance between the two can be assessed. When the camera vantage point of the AM photograph is exactly replicated for skull photography, the superimposition is a relatively straightforward process as the images are precisely comparable without complicating factors. In practice, however, focus distances are almost never exactly replicated because the focus distance for AM face photography is rarely known. Embedded differences in perspective, thereby, drive the images away from correspondence, raising questions as to how much difference can be tolerated and what image registration methods should be used. Recently, a ± 1% mismatch in facial height has been posited as an acceptable upper tolerance limit to differential perspective, but this proposition is speculative and has not yet been confirmed by tests on real-life images. In addition, the impact of image registration methods, though critically relevant, has received comparatively little consideration. This paper provides the first in-depth review of these intertwined perspective/registration matters and objective evaluation of tolerances by using real 2D photographic images and synthetic images generated from 3D CT data to demonstrate perspective impact on skull morphology. Taken together, the review confirms a ≤ 1% perspective difference in facial height to be a suitable criterion for craniofacial superimposition (at least as a starting point for method improvement), and that image registration should be point-based using a sellion/nasion combination to minimize anatomical misalignment in the principal region-of-interest (the mid-face). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00414-023-03081-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10567890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105678902023-10-13 Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review Healy, Sean S. Stephan, Carl N. Int J Legal Med Review Craniofacial superimposition requires the photographic registration of a skull at transparency to a photograph of an antemortem (AM) face so that anatomical concordance between the two can be assessed. When the camera vantage point of the AM photograph is exactly replicated for skull photography, the superimposition is a relatively straightforward process as the images are precisely comparable without complicating factors. In practice, however, focus distances are almost never exactly replicated because the focus distance for AM face photography is rarely known. Embedded differences in perspective, thereby, drive the images away from correspondence, raising questions as to how much difference can be tolerated and what image registration methods should be used. Recently, a ± 1% mismatch in facial height has been posited as an acceptable upper tolerance limit to differential perspective, but this proposition is speculative and has not yet been confirmed by tests on real-life images. In addition, the impact of image registration methods, though critically relevant, has received comparatively little consideration. This paper provides the first in-depth review of these intertwined perspective/registration matters and objective evaluation of tolerances by using real 2D photographic images and synthetic images generated from 3D CT data to demonstrate perspective impact on skull morphology. Taken together, the review confirms a ≤ 1% perspective difference in facial height to be a suitable criterion for craniofacial superimposition (at least as a starting point for method improvement), and that image registration should be point-based using a sellion/nasion combination to minimize anatomical misalignment in the principal region-of-interest (the mid-face). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00414-023-03081-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10567890/ /pubmed/37702755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03081-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Healy, Sean S. Stephan, Carl N. Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review |
title | Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review |
title_full | Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review |
title_fullStr | Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review |
title_full_unstemmed | Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review |
title_short | Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review |
title_sort | perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37702755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03081-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT healyseans perspectivedistortiontolerancesandskullfaceregistrationincraniofacialsuperimpositionananalyticalreview AT stephancarln perspectivedistortiontolerancesandskullfaceregistrationincraniofacialsuperimpositionananalyticalreview |