Cargando…
A pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation
OBJECTIVES: Ivabradine may have a role in rate control of atrial fibrillation (AF) due to effects on HCN channels in AV node. We studied role of Ivabradine in rate control of rheumatic AF. METHODS: 80 patients, rheumatic AF, HR > 100 bpm (age 47 ± 11 yrs, AF duration 6.8 ± 2.9 years, rate 131 ± 1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37666416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2023.08.006 |
_version_ | 1785119273332506624 |
---|---|
author | Katheria, Arpita Kapoor, Aditya Sahu, Ankit Raut, Kamlesh Khare, Harshit Khanna, Roopali Kumar, Sudeep Garg, Naveen Tewari, Satyendra |
author_facet | Katheria, Arpita Kapoor, Aditya Sahu, Ankit Raut, Kamlesh Khare, Harshit Khanna, Roopali Kumar, Sudeep Garg, Naveen Tewari, Satyendra |
author_sort | Katheria, Arpita |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Ivabradine may have a role in rate control of atrial fibrillation (AF) due to effects on HCN channels in AV node. We studied role of Ivabradine in rate control of rheumatic AF. METHODS: 80 patients, rheumatic AF, HR > 100 bpm (age 47 ± 11 yrs, AF duration 6.8 ± 2.9 years, rate 131 ± 16 bpm) on maximally tolerated ββ or CCB's, randomized to Ivabradine or escalated ββ/CCB. Ivabradine started @ 2.5 mg BD; increased to 5 mg BD if inadequate response at 1 week (failure to decrease HR < 10% vs baseline). After Holter at 1 month, dose escalated to 7.5 mg BD if needed. RESULTS: Ivabradine resulted in significantly lower HR (81 ± 10 vs 99 ± 9) at 3 months and 6 months (79 ± 8 vs 94 ± 8, p < 0.001). Absolute reduction in HR: 56 ± 15 vs 31 ± 14 bpm and % change in HR: 41 ± 7 vs 24 ± 9%, both p < 0.00001). At 6 months, Ivabradine group had. 1Significantly lower NT Pro BNP (1168 vs 1314 pg/ml), higher 6 min walk distance (410 ± 47 vs 349 ± 54 m, all p < 0.001) 2Better symptom class (EHRA score 1: asymptomatic 84% vs 40%), improvement >1 EHRA class; baseline 60% vs 17% 3Better LA Strain (22.8 ± 2.8% vs 20.6 ± 2.5%) Ivabradine was well tolerated and there was no drug withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that Ivabradine can be an option for rate control in rheumatic AF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10568053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105680532023-10-13 A pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation Katheria, Arpita Kapoor, Aditya Sahu, Ankit Raut, Kamlesh Khare, Harshit Khanna, Roopali Kumar, Sudeep Garg, Naveen Tewari, Satyendra Indian Heart J Original Article OBJECTIVES: Ivabradine may have a role in rate control of atrial fibrillation (AF) due to effects on HCN channels in AV node. We studied role of Ivabradine in rate control of rheumatic AF. METHODS: 80 patients, rheumatic AF, HR > 100 bpm (age 47 ± 11 yrs, AF duration 6.8 ± 2.9 years, rate 131 ± 16 bpm) on maximally tolerated ββ or CCB's, randomized to Ivabradine or escalated ββ/CCB. Ivabradine started @ 2.5 mg BD; increased to 5 mg BD if inadequate response at 1 week (failure to decrease HR < 10% vs baseline). After Holter at 1 month, dose escalated to 7.5 mg BD if needed. RESULTS: Ivabradine resulted in significantly lower HR (81 ± 10 vs 99 ± 9) at 3 months and 6 months (79 ± 8 vs 94 ± 8, p < 0.001). Absolute reduction in HR: 56 ± 15 vs 31 ± 14 bpm and % change in HR: 41 ± 7 vs 24 ± 9%, both p < 0.00001). At 6 months, Ivabradine group had. 1Significantly lower NT Pro BNP (1168 vs 1314 pg/ml), higher 6 min walk distance (410 ± 47 vs 349 ± 54 m, all p < 0.001) 2Better symptom class (EHRA score 1: asymptomatic 84% vs 40%), improvement >1 EHRA class; baseline 60% vs 17% 3Better LA Strain (22.8 ± 2.8% vs 20.6 ± 2.5%) Ivabradine was well tolerated and there was no drug withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that Ivabradine can be an option for rate control in rheumatic AF. Elsevier 2023 2023-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10568053/ /pubmed/37666416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2023.08.006 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd on behalf of Cardiological Society of India. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Katheria, Arpita Kapoor, Aditya Sahu, Ankit Raut, Kamlesh Khare, Harshit Khanna, Roopali Kumar, Sudeep Garg, Naveen Tewari, Satyendra A pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation |
title | A pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation |
title_full | A pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation |
title_fullStr | A pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation |
title_short | A pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation |
title_sort | pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37666416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2023.08.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katheriaarpita apilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT kapooraditya apilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT sahuankit apilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT rautkamlesh apilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT khareharshit apilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT khannaroopali apilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT kumarsudeep apilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT gargnaveen apilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT tewarisatyendra apilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT katheriaarpita pilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT kapooraditya pilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT sahuankit pilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT rautkamlesh pilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT khareharshit pilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT khannaroopali pilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT kumarsudeep pilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT gargnaveen pilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation AT tewarisatyendra pilotstudyevaluatingtheroleofivabradineforratecontrolinpatientswithrheumaticatrialfibrillation |